One of gold's roles in diversification is as an apocalypse insurance. It (and silver and possibly real estate) are among the few things that would retain value in a genuine depression. Other candidates include stocks in weapons contractors like Raytheon, and if you have specific skills like medical training. Canadian mint gold coins have a good reputation and thus you would not need to worry about purity tests.
It is debatable if the current agenda in the USA is more business friendly. They are cutting back on trade deals which is not helpful, there's a threat now yo pull out of NAFTA, with Canada and Mexico being the second and third largest trading partners of the USA. They are also failing to pursue new trade deals. The recent tax reform is raising the cost of living on the middle class.
One of the valid things that Steve Bannon stated is that the US is currently in a global trade war with China. He said that they have ~15 years to try and win it, if they fail then China will dominate the global economy in the 21st century. I agree with him on the general picture. Right now the USA is pulling out of trade talks globally, that includes micro-trade deals not discussed in Africa for example.
"One of gold's roles in diversification is as an apocalypse insurance. It (and silver and possibly real estate) are among the few things that would retain value in a genuine depression. "
Agree with your weapons sentiment, but in reality this thought on gold is just silly and lacking in critical thought. It's a stoner thinking about a zombie apocalypse hypothetical. Do you really believe in an apocalypse (economic or otherwise) in which people are legitimately stocking up on guns that they are going to move to a non divisible asset with MASSIVE storage risk, purity test difficulty and high cost of carry? Not simply saying that as a rhetorical, take a legitimate think about how ridiculous that sounds. You're simply quoting what someone else said without thinking it through.
Wishful thinking on behalf of gold and silver bugs on a hypothetical with no precedent and no a shred of logical thought backing it. Nothing but cliche and a meme.
"would not need to worry about purity tests."
Not when buying, but highly likely when selling.
"The recent tax reform is raising the cost of living on the middle class."
Specific examples? For the majority this is simply false.
"It is debatable if the current agenda in the USA is more business friendly. They are cutting back on trade deals which is not helpful, there's a threat now yo pull out of NAFTA, with Canada and Mexico being the second and third largest trading partners of the USA. They are also failing to pursue new trade deals. The recent tax reform is raising the cost of living on the middle class."
No one who was being honest would suggest the current agenda isn't more pro business than the last, or even the one before that. Exports at an all time high and removal from the trade deals in question would have a negligble effect on GDP in terms of the figures I have seen while pulling out will have many benefits for the worker and economic sovereignty. Rejection of the Paris agreement and a more free market approach to energy at the federal level another benefit. Business confidence figures also undeniably soared upon Trumps election and have held relatively steady since. Same story for small business confidence. Corporate tax cuts are huge as well.
Could put out points all day on this issue, there isn't a single metric under which you could suggest Trump is less business friendly, but if you can find one that isn't talking points about pulling out of trade deals and talks (while exports are visibly increasing) then that would be nice. Those getting upset over his approach to trade and suggesting they will hurt the US are rather tellingly nations such as China who are visible competitors. Many of the hardline talks on trade pre-election such as massive tariffs were all talk to begin with and will never be implemented.