Drug for growing breastsWhat's bica?
Drug for growing breastsWhat's bica?
Hasnt that been the plan since the beginning?In 5 years, i think the main goal will not be to keep or regrow our hair, but to eat and survive.
ok, what this company is doing? they only want to prevent hair loss or regrow full head of hair?씨케이바이오텍
최강열 연대 생명공학과 교수 창업, 시리즈B 펀딩 포함 누적 투자금 200억 씨케이바이오텍(CK Biotech)은 연세대 생명공학과 교수인 최강열 대표가 2016년 10월 설립한 교원 창업 기업이다. 올해로 설립 5년 차를 맞는 스타트업이지만 이미 우수한 기술력을 인정받아 기관투자자들로부터 2차례에 걸쳐 200억원가량을 투자받았다. 연내 주력 파이프라인의 임상시험계획(IND)을 제출하는 것을 목표로 하고 있다. 내년 안에 연구개발(R&D) 성과를 토대로 주관사 선정 등 IPO 사전 작업을 진행할 계획이다. 씨케이바이오텍...ckbiotech.co.kr
Not sure if this has been discussed -- The CEO of CK BIO (KY19382) expects to submit an IND this year and finish phase 2 in 2023.
edit: they've also received ~$40mm in series a/b funding.
Just watched a kevin mann video about this. It's a growth stimulator that may or may not pass phase 3ok, what this company is doing? they only want to prevent hair loss or regrow full head of hair?
As if Kevin Mann has any clue whether or not a drug in pre-clinical development will pass phase 3 lolJust watched a kevin mann video about this. It's a growth stimulator that may or may not pass phase 3
That was my personal opinion on it. These miracle grow treatments seem like a Longshot. I think anti androgen are the only real approach for the time being.As if Kevin Mann has any clue whether or not a drug in pre-clinical development will pass phase 3 lol
Why phase 3? What about phase 1&2?
what about grey hair cure ? any news?That was my personal opinion on it. These miracle grow treatments seem like a Longshot. I think anti androgen are the only real approach for the time being.
Oh true. I still don't see how you could possibly gauge whether or not a treatment will succeed a certain level of trials.That was my personal opinion on it. These miracle grow treatments seem like a Longshot. I think anti androgen are the only real approach for the time being.
Best case scenario is side effect free maintenance. I think if finasteride didn't have side effects people wouldn't be afraid to at least try it.Oh true. I still don't see how you could possibly gauge whether or not a treatment will succeed a certain level of trials.
Of course AA is the more feasible treatment path right now, but Androgenetic Alopecia isn't going to be cured from that AA route.
There is no such thing as "side effect free" drugs.Best case scenario is side effect free maintenance. I think if finasteride didn't have side effects people wouldn't be afraid to at least try it.
Sorry, let me rephrase that. Minimal risk of sexual side effects but strong efficacy. Finasteride is allegedly 2-6% which is actually pretty high. If the side effect odds were much lower people wouldn't hesitate to start treatment.There is no such thing as "side effect free" drugs.
I think if finasteride didn't have side effects people wouldn't be afraid to at least try it.
The problem isn't that people don't try it.
The problem is that they do try it and the side effects are very common.
The sides are not common really, millions of men take it, this forum is not representative of them. Even when people do get sides they are usually minor and nothing to warrant stopping it. An extremely small portion do get very bad sides though, im not denying that.
Sure. 90-something percent of men have an off-the-shelf option to stop their hair loss without any side effects. That's the world we live in. In fact it's already been this way for 30 years; a whole generation now. Any local dermatologist can write you the script. All you have to do is ask . . .
Hear that beeping sound? That's your mental bullsh*t detector. It knows a load of crap when it hears one.