So far for expressing his opinion, and the things he was told by the people behind histogen he's been criticized... What does he stand to gain by posting more info? Whatever he says occulus is obviously going to criticize. Occulus and his puppet folliman just need to learn some tact... It's one thing to express an opinion, but it's another thing to be critical of people trying to help you!
That's not the question. The thing is, the members here helped finance his trip to the hair congress where he was able make that connection with here to obtain this 'secret' information. Occulus and Folliman were unnecessarily aggressive, but instead of trying to prove them wrong and restore faith in Histogen, he's choosing to withhold this information. I'm not trying to pick a fight with one of the most respected members here, but this seems a bit juvenile.
Argh!!! We need a paid section to this forum. Funds could go to sending someone to a seminar or something. $50 a year?
That's not the question. The thing is, the members here helped finance his trip to the hair congress where he was able make that connection with here to obtain this 'secret' information. Occulus and Folliman were unnecessarily aggressive, but instead of trying to prove them wrong and restore faith in Histogen, he's choosing to withhold this information. I'm not trying to pick a fight with one of the most respected members here, but this seems a bit juvenile.
That's not the question. The thing is, the members here helped finance his trip to the hair congress where he was able make that connection with here to obtain this 'secret' information. Occulus and Folliman were unnecessarily aggressive, but instead of trying to prove them wrong and restore faith in Histogen, he's choosing to withhold this information. I'm not trying to pick a fight with one of the most respected members here, but this seems a bit juvenile.
Also, theres no 'secret' info im withholding from anyone from the Hair Congress in Miami. I shared everything and anything I could. The 'new' news is something recent.
I think you're missing the point... He's the one that offered to attend, he's the one that scheduled these interviews, he's the one typing up, posting, or explaining what was said at these seminars... He didn't make money doing this... You're acting like doners own rights to whatever information hellouser obtains over a five year period. He went, he reported, and realistically doesn't owe anyone anything... Personally I don't know why I have to even state that, it should be common knowledge... I'd love to hear news on histogen too, but to be quite honest I can't say I blame him if all he's going to get out of it are people criticizing him, and the freaking images... Like Pavi said forget the pics, go read the results of the study...
Can we at least be told when we can expect to hear of this news?
While I share your views on Histogen, you're sounding eerily similar to Spencer Kobren. Everyone has moved to HairLossTalk.com because it's a place without censorship. Members are entitled to voice their opinions on a treatment, no matter how shi**y that opinion may be.When members stop polluting threads with conspiracy theories and wild claims of combovers, scams, doctored photos, etc. It's insulting to the rest of the forum members. We aren't blind. The results are real.
While I share your views on Histogen, you're sounding eerily similar to Spencer Kobren. Everyone has moved to HairLossTalk.com because it's a place without censorship. Members are entitled to voice their opinions on a treatment, no matter how shi**y that opinion may be.
I agree.I'm open to differences of opinion and viewpoints. But calling this a combover is ridiculous:
When members stop polluting threads with conspiracy theories and wild claims of combovers, scams, doctored photos, etc. It's insulting to the rest of the forum members. We aren't blind. The results are real.
While I share your views on Histogen, you're sounding eerily similar to Spencer Kobren. Everyone has moved to HairLossTalk.com because it's a place without censorship. Members are entitled to voice their opinions on a treatment, no matter how shi**y that opinion may be.
Hmm, that is impressive, but since human hair growth is supposedly 0.5in / month the subject's hair should only be ~3in at 24 weeks; in the photo it appears longer, unless i'm missing something here?
I do believe the subject is the same and there seems to be quite a bit of regrowth but i find it strange that this is in fact at the 6 month mark.