ChrisW1980uk
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 49
ok well they must HAVE ALL been shallow then.
the interviewed 50+ women, this is hardly "a few shallow ones".
"I have been asking many women about whether or not they see themselves dating a SHORT man, and the overwhelming majority said NO."
do you not even read the posts I link,
It's not "the odd few are shallow", its THE VAST MAJORITY.
in fact im not even sure chris even has a woman, his opinion on dating women at 5 3 is so ridiculous, even most men that are 5 6 with women know how harse it is, the rejection is quite strong, they will defenetly attest to how hard it is to be short, chris doesnt seem bothered at 5 3, but he must of just found the odd girl that wasn't bothered, and has formed an opinion based on a few very lucky encounters that he has some personality thing that makes it so being 5 3 isn't so bad.
there was one guy who was 5 6, and he had a women who was 5 0, and he said he knows how bad it is to be short, and if he met her at 5 4 they wouldn't be together, and he has a very hard time dating at 5 6.
but chris's view of 5 3 is totally ludicrous, he barely factors it in, seriously most girls will laugh at guys 5 4 and under, they will say things to you like "this 16 year old school kid tried to hit on me", really it is bad.
on teh dating show take me out there was a 5 5 guy and ALL THE WOMEN REJECTED HIM BASED ON HIS HEIGHT, then the next contested looked practically the same as the 5 5 guy but was 6 2, and the women were swooning over him saying "im not good looking enough for him"
oh and dont come back saying" that's just some show, not RL", unfortunetly that is a very close to what real life is like, not 1:1, but close enough to be pretty bad.
that is a stupid comparison, they said they would NEVER be with a guy that short, PERIOD.
you a treating the subject way too lightly, "i have more personality than a cardboard cut-out" are you for real? it's not about being a cardbaord cutout, the girls were interested to date the guy at 5 6 - 6 0, but not at 5 4 and under based on his height, his height was an instant deal breaker.
the cardboard cut-out illustrated the question "would you date this guy at 5 8 or 5 4", and no girl wanted him at 5 4 but many at 5 8, that was what the test was a bout, seriously QC you're post there seemed a bit stupid do you not agree?
if you see a couple and the guy is 5 8 and she is 5 4, if he was 5 3 they would not be together, fact of life.
they have done things like this before, and said to the girls "he is rich, with good personality", when they are rich and love kids, they become more interested, you can overcome height with money, but not @ 5 3!
he still hasn't even said how tall his gf is, he will probably lie and say she is 4 11, to make it seem more right, he is full of lies.
In a study by Gillis and Avis (1980) only 2 couples out of 720 consisted of a pair in which the man was shorter than the woman.
In a study by Hensley (1994), women most preferred a man who was 6ft tall
In a study by Cameron (1978), 100% of the women advertised the desire to date a man who was 4 inches taller than themselves.*
its not about being a cardboard cut-out, its a fact you can't be shorter than a woman, seriously there is a 0.01% chance of it working out.
http://www.thisisyourconscience.com...ng-hung-like-a-caterpillar-a-man-being-short/
Because I am a naturally inquisitive person, I like to informally poll people all the time, and for the last couple of weeks I have been asking many women about whether or not they see themselves dating a SHORT man, and the overwhelming majority said NO. But that’s not what was shocking or surprising to me because I have been pretty cognizant of that fact all my life, but the truly HARSH part of the poll is that there is little to NO reconciliatory efforts the short man can make to get BACK in the good, potential-nani-smashing graces of said woman.
not it is upper market PERIOD
upper market for scotland, for edinburgh, for glasgow, for newcastle, for london, for ireland, manchester etc.
upper middle PERIOD.
stop this area **** at once!
Chris hasn't , he is Bull****ting, that is what he does, he's on an impact of hairloss forum at age 32 with no noticeable sings of hairloss, claiming to have slept with more women than the average british man in half the time they said, and while being 7" below average in height which is bull****.
and I can show you a video documentary on shortness, where someone made a cardboard cut out of a guy at various heights form 5 2 - 6 0 and asked girls on the street which ones they would date and the 5 2 and 5 4 guy got NO dates and all, all the girls said they would never date a man so short as 5 4 or under, so I know that practically all of chris's GF's friends would not be with a guy who is 5 3 b/c i have seen it with my own two eyes.
and his opinion on being 5 3 is a complete fallacy he claims he got a little rejection but overall confidence etc... but it is totally bull**** you get totally hammered at 5 3!, even 5 5, 5 7 is safe ground, he simply got lucky, and none of his GF's friends would be with a guy that short PERIOD.
and he claimed to earn £35,000 a year at age 24, again bull****, secondary school teachers at age 25 earn £25,000 and peak at £35,000 later on in life, he's not earnign that much at that age, no one does, he claimed it was "some sales job" and he was "good", I think he stated his bonus made him earn an extra £10,000 a year, again Bull****.
he was bull****ting, now he backed down and claims to earn regular wages at £12,000 a year.
Christ the guy used to think regular doctors earned £100K a year, then he later backed down and said "i meant GPs" , that is Bull**** he meant regular doctors right from the start, and he knows it.
what about the fact that you said you can only get a tiny flat in london for £350K
how can you be completely wrong.
I never said i never had a GF, he infered that from some joke post I made a while back.
I don't wish to divulge such information, I can tell when people are lying like chris, I wouldn't believe him, he claims to have slept with more women than men claim in surveys, while being 7" below the male average, and in half the time the other males did, he also claimed to "get the odd rejection" from women at 5 3, hah this guy is talking totally out of his arse, his stats proove that, complete BS.
can you please answer the question, your view on the property market is totally wrong, seriously any property advisor would laugh at you if you think " £350K is "lower middle" " and "you can only afford a small flat" on that.
£350K is clearly NOT lower middle, how is a 5 bedroom detached lower middle?
and there is not one cheap flat there?
are you for real? I provide links to property website showing you you are totally off, yet you ignore it entirely and bring up something completely irrelevant.
Chris you keep attacking me, slept with no one, virgin, socially inept.
not sure where this comes from.
jealousy that I am rich?
likely.
are you living with parents NOW?
if so, are you embarrassed by it?
- - - Updated - - -
No I didn't.
I was jokingly said "hand't popped cherry" in good spirit, that was a laugh post where I was saying things like bulge pants and stuff.
anway fact is you make up crap.
slept with more women than other men, on average
while being 7" below the male average
and at a much younger age
everything you say is a lie.
no doubt your GF is 5 8 or something.
again, more crap.
are you still on £50K a year btw?
and you still have't said whether you live on your own or with your parents, you keep dodging that.
I know you are lying due to this research
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/se...sexual-partners-in-lifetime-women-have-4.html
average is 9 FOR A LIFETIME, I doubt you are at 13, and at 5 foot 3 as well, by the time your 28!
is this like your job where you earn more than junior doctors again?
and where do you live independently, no doubt you live somewhere where you can't afford. < you have dodged this question to.
its all lies for you,
1. you changed your height, said you were 5 4, now you stick to 5 3,
2. you earn more than doctors do twice your age, you claim you'r bonuses double your salary "Because your good" which NO ONE else gets (fireman, police man etc.),
3. you claim to have slept with 30% more girls than the average man has...in his lifetime and you are only 1/3 way through your adult life and at 5 3 as well!!!, this makes the claim sound even more ridiculous.
on top of this you don't have any socially noticeable hairloss and you are 30, what are you doing here!
All from this thread http://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/showthread.php/66551-All-good-things-come-to-an-end