Well I just got my genistein in the mail. I'm healing from surgery so wary of new agents. Looked again online to see if it would be safe for my healing. Checked Wikipedia (which apparently I should have done first), and this unfortunately looks like a bust of an agent.
It's an angiogenesis inhibitor. Ie. It blocks blood flow. This is counterproductive to stimulating hair growth.
For example, VEGF is one of the primary stimulators of vascularization and has a positive effect on hair development:
Our study aimed to quantify the cyclic changes of perifollicular vascularization and to characterize the biological role of VEGF for hair growth, angiogenesis, and follicle cycling. We found a significant increase in perifollicular vascularization during the growth phase (anagen) of the hair cycle, followed by regression of angiogenic blood vessels during the involution (catagen) and the resting (telogen) phase. These results identify VEGF as a major mediator of hair follicle growth and cycling and provide the first direct evidence that improved follicle vascularization promotes hair growth and increases hair follicle and hair size.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC199257/
The problem is something with anti-angiogenesis behavior will inhibit the positive vascularization needed for hair growth, and this appears to be the case for genistein:
Anti-angiogenic genistein inhibits VEGF-induced endothelial cell activation by decreasing PTK activity and MAPK activation.
Collectively, our findings suggested that the inhibition of PTK activity and MAPK activation and the decrease in MMPs production and activity by genistein interrupt VEGF-stimulated endothelial cell activation, which thereby may represent a mechanism that would explain the anti-angiogenesis effect of genistein and its cancer-protective function.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21132400
Well, you can't win them all. At least it was cheap. Damn shame. An almost pure and easily accessible ER-beta agonist could have been golden. Who knows? Maybe it would still be good if the ER-beta agonism effect outweighs the anti-vascularization effect. But I'm not gonna take that risk.
Looks like equol and estriol are our only good/safe options for ER-beta agonism unless something else can come up.
Wikipedia lists the following as ER-beta agonists:
Maybe there is another good option in there. I'll probably keep looking in my spare time. The problem is most of these agents are likely so experimental, there wouldn't be enough information out there to tell us if there's going to be a problem or not. eg. for FERb 033.
Probably honestly best to stick with estriol and/or equol unless there's a massive element of desperation to experiment. My hair is so stable now, I have no need to take drastic risks. I'd prefer to stick with safer agents.