I Completely Understand The Idea Behind Eugenics Now..

Saurabhaj

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,239
Life > baldness

Yes, take an example, suppose me or any user,he may be called as a Bald before 30's,
but later after 5/10 years,he won't be called Bald,he would be called loser if i or him didn't focus on another aspects of Life.
This is not Coping.
Those who say I will trade entire worth for Money,they did not know what happens when a man gets bankrupt.
Friend's will leave you,you will be excluded from social circle,no one wants to be with a failure guy anywhere on this planet.

To the young guys,study hard,go to Interview without giving a f*** to baldness or hairloss.
If you don't do this now..
Today you might be crying for hairs..
tomorrow you will be crying for money,life,Job,future.
 

swingline747

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,380
I understand my friend and I MOSTLY agree. But, for myself, it's just hard to determine where the line is drawn. I may be a NW1 and have kids with a woman who carries the recessive Androgenetic Alopecia genes and not even know it. I could breed with a gorgeous woman and have a kid with aspergers, or another condition for which they are bullied. I have a really slow metabolism myself, there is no guarantee my child won't inherit it.

It's not necessarily selfish. If you have money, a completely healthy body and will be a loving, giving, responsible parent the kid will have the potential for an amazing, prosperous life despite certain genetic "flaws". I would definitely have children with the right woman, despite my Androgenetic Alopecia. You raise a kid properly and are involved in their schooling, then bullying can be avoided or drastically reduced. I will love him / her and play to their strengths.

Being unattractive is a hellish part of life, I am not denying that. But I have seen sooooo many 9/10 NW1s that may have easy lives in a societal respect, but had such messed up families that they are living in a different kind of hell. Some of them don't even know it because people have blown smoke up their *** all the time, but they are mentally f*cked and when they lose their looks in their late 30's, they are in for living a nightmare.

I simply think there are way too many variables to even have this discussion.

Then have kids, Im not telling you to stop... in the end I just dont want to pay for them. Im already taxed more than people with kids (no child credits, paying full taxes on everything), and will never use the services needed by parents. Im just saying people need to start weighing in ALL options from the kids POV as well. Not just what they "think" they "can" provide.

There is always a margin for error. But Im also for late term if the child is seen to have some defect that will inhibit its life or even the life of the parents, should they choose. But again if you choose to accept the responsibility of the disabled child you shouldnt be looking outward for help.
Just my POV.
 
Top