What you are stating here makes sense to me and is not that far from what I'd written, I'd say. As I pointed out, I've tried to be less picky and go with what opportunities present themselves to me. Unlike you, it didn't satisfy me. And believe me, I wish it had. I just doubt you can do much about your nature - or do you have any ideas as to how to influence what attracts and satisfies you?
I've met girls I matched with mentally. Some of them I developed genuine romantic feelings for. They were the ones I found physically attractive from the beginning. They couldn't share the romantic part.
Realism is almost the polar opposite to romanticism but I think a realist will be happier long term. Looks like you are thinking in a more healthy manner.
I've always thought like that, at least since joining here, but that does not mean I can/would know how to change my nature/desires. I could have long ago taken relationships further where I felt loved, desired and that would have worked really well financially and personality-wise. It's not that I don't see/have those realistic options at all.
I respect your view point - at least you are rational.
It's where I disagree with the title of this thread. It's not women's fault I'm aiming too high. And I don't blame them for aiming high themselves either. But I have no sympathy if they cry/or wonder why when they are only good enough for sex and I cannot relate to the ones who lack the self-awareness that they aim too high.
"The role of the female given to it by nature is to pleasure and serve men well. It was designed to be dominated by man in its entirety it needs no rights or freedom."
Delusional. You need to be above average for that.