- Reaction score
- 1,177
Unless you're a NW2000 I don't see why someone would envy old Tesla's NW4.5.I think it's just Norwood envy
Unless you're a NW2000 I don't see why someone would envy old Tesla's NW4.5.I think it's just Norwood envy
Have you seen American Psycho? Remember that business card scene? Now imagine that with Norwoods.
One of us lol.Fun fact: Patrick Bateman was using anti-hair thinning supplements as part of his routine:
"Over the weekend I plan to go to Bloomingdale’s or Bergdorf’s and on Evelyn’s advice pick up a Foltene European Supplement and Shampoo for thinning hair which contains complex carbohydrates that penetrate the hair shafts for improved strength and shine. Also the Vivagen Hair Enrichment Treatment, a new Redken product that prevents mineral deposits and prolongs the life cycle of hair. Luis Carruthers recommended the Aramis Nutriplexx system, a nutrient complex that helps increase circulation."
He was not using minoxidil, which had come out only a few years before the book was published, so maybe it wasn't as well known and popular as it is today.
I read the excerpt involving the hobo, yikes. Also I heard there's necrophilia, child murder, and a scene involving a rat and a tube and a woman and the rest is NSFW."more brutal than the film"
Lol, it's not even close.
Of course you can do this.Obviously I can hide it and be a regular man with emotions who care but the truth is I don't want to have emotional/intellectual/spiritual journey and spend time on a girl. I only want someone to cook for me and to have sex if I want.
I'm 6.2 decent looking in an average shape and Norwood 1 after hair transplant, is it attractive enough?Of course you can do this.
YOu just have to be very attractive for women to be up for it.
And, since you're on this sub, you're probably ugly (bald) like the rest of us.
Sounds like typical volumizing shampoo, not anti baldness shampooOne of us lol.
I need to read the book some day, I have it but haven't gotten around to reading it. Apparently it is way more brutal than the film.
Nah it says that it thickens the hair itself, so maybe it's one of those biotin things.Sounds like typical volumizing shampoo, not anti baldness shampoo
We're basically living in the medieval ages in hair loss treatment history lolHere is an article from '86, before minoxidil was FDA approved:
NEW HOPE FOR HAIR GROWTH MAY LIE IN DRUG STUDY - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Aramis Nutriplexx is mentioned here, and it indeed seems to have been a product that was marketed as anti-hairloss.
Of course, from our current perspective this is all mostly pre-history.
Pretty much, yes.I'm 6.2 decent looking in an average shape and Norwood 1 after hair transplant, is it attractive enough?
lmao i remember trying biotin in my snake oil days. nails grew, body hair grew, horseshoe grew, spiderweb thin hairs grew LMAONah it says that it thickens the hair itself, so maybe it's one of those biotin things.
I'm kinda tempted to try it, I have a lot of miniaturized hairs that just doesn't grow properly (if I lose them though I'll probably become a NW4 ) so it would be interesting if biotin could make them grow longer.lmao i remember trying biotin in my snake oil days. nails grew, body hair grew, horseshoe grew, spiderweb thin hairs grew LMAO
Yea my hairs didn't get thicker but they did grow faster lmao. So cud be worth a shot.I'm kinda tempted to try it, I have a lot of miniaturized hairs that just doesn't grow properly (if I lose them though I'll probably become a NW4 ) so it would be interesting if biotin could make them grow longer.
i take a lot of vitamins hope im ok lolBut be careful with vitamins and supplements, there have been deaths from even vitamins believe it or not
Soy post.If you want to actually be based, Tony, live by your own rules.
Don't "hear" the ideas of women. When a woman uses her intellect to build a new device, don't validate her intellectual work by paying her money for the device. Is that level of consistency too much to ask? Words are cheap, actions matter.
One thing that you should probably do in practice is avoid CT-scans and radiation therapy in your life. After all, those technologies are heavily based on the intellectual work of Marie Curie, and people who spent a lot of time "hearing" her.
Will you actually do that? If so, I would heavily disagree with your worldview, but I would consider you based. A certain level of respect should be given to people who live by their ideals, even when it is difficult and involves sacrifice.
But if, when push comes to shove, you decide to use CT-scans and radiation therapy, among many other devices that are based on the intellectual work of women, I'm afraid you are cringe and a cuck.
dude i thought you were based where is this cuckoldry coming from lmao. b-b-b-b-b-bruh but wat about da 1% of inventions made by women (IF that considering how SJW history and humanities departments are)If you want to actually be based, Tony, live by your own rules.
Don't "hear" the ideas of women. When a woman uses her intellect to build a new device, don't validate her intellectual work by paying her money for the device. Is that level of consistency too much to ask? Words are cheap, actions matter.
One thing that you should probably do in practice is avoid CT-scans and radiation therapy in your life. After all, those technologies are heavily based on the intellectual work of Marie Curie, and people who spent a lot of time "hearing" her.
Will you actually do that? If so, I would heavily disagree with your worldview, but I would consider you based. A certain level of respect should be given to people who live by their ideals, even when it is difficult and involves sacrifice.
But if, when push comes to shove, you decide to use CT-scans and radiation therapy, among many other devices that are based on the intellectual work of women, I'm afraid you are cringe and a cuck.
If you want to actually be based, Tony, live by your own rules.
Don't "hear" the ideas of women. When a woman uses her intellect to build a new device, don't validate her intellectual work by paying her money for the device. Is that level of consistency too much to ask? Words are cheap, actions matter.
One thing that you should probably do in practice is avoid CT-scans and radiation therapy in your life. After all, those technologies are heavily based on the intellectual work of Marie Curie, and people who spent a lot of time "hearing" her.
Will you actually do that? If so, I would heavily disagree with your worldview, but I would consider you based. A certain level of respect should be given to people who live by their ideals, even when it is difficult and involves sacrifice.
But if, when push comes to shove, you decide to use CT-scans and radiation therapy, among many other devices that are based on the intellectual work of women, I'm afraid you are cringe and a cuck.