I Think I Am One Of The Worst People To Have Hairloss Happen To

resu

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,343
EVERYTHING is better in metric.
In science everyone uses metric because it's a better system.
I'd put money on that in a few decades everyone all over the world will be learning metric in school.

I was thinking about tools and such instead of measuring 4,565mm for instance. Something I hate is also cups and tea-spoons, just measure it in grams.

Still only U.S., Liberia, and Myanmar use the imperial system.
 

CaptainForehead

Senior Member
Reaction score
4,302
2 Old members eventually left after getting hot women

S.a.f., who had a badly diffused nw6 and bad transplant, and ori83 who was straight Norwood 4-5. S.a.f. Got with some literal model and ori83 got with some fine Russian woman. To be fair though ori was a tanned ethnic who could pull it off well. I saw the pics of his girl, I was impressed. He was just 5 foot 8 inches too

@WhitePolarBear I got my facts right didn't I? @CaptainForehead , another classic poster should remember

I remember the posters, but I was not aware they had bagged hot ladies, good for them!!!!
Do you have the threads where they mention these women?
 

rclark

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,773
Not only do I have to be losing my hair at a young age but I have always been very obsessed with how my hair looks even since I was 12 years old . Not to mention I am below average height and hair has been my identity that I can feel good about myself.

I recently started Propecia and now im considering taking a break as my libido has almost became non existent.

Wondering if anyone else feels like they are one of the worst possible people for hair loss to happen to? Its actually ridiculous. and now I am screwing with my body on this drug so I am affecting other areas on my life to which just causes extreme head ache and makes me want to commit suicide.

Also, if anyone would be willing I will share a pic in PM if you want to help me try to judge how f*cked I am bald. I am guessing I go from avergish to a 2/10.

Nobody feels that way.lol. Just kidding.

Think that sums up everybody here.
 

rclark

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,773
Yea I didn't mean to make it sound like it's all about me

It's just the combo of - being young + being short + not having a masculine face to pull of bald

Being short, that probably is bad. When I'm in a room with guys taller than me, I feel
worse.

That said, for my age, my hair density is OK. Most guys my age are Norwood fours.

That does suck for you. It does.

Best of luck. I started balding in my late teens.
 

Baldingat188

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,513
Being short, that probably is bad. When I'm in a room with guys taller than me, I feel
worse.

That said, for my age, my hair density is OK. Most guys my age are Norwood fours.

That does suck for you. It does.

Best of luck. I started balding in my late teens.


How old ru now?

I think I've been balding since 16 but it hasn't been going super fast so I'm hoping I can maintain for a while
 

rclark

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,773
How old ru now?

I think I've been balding since 16 but it hasn't been going super fast so I'm hoping I can maintain for a while

Almost fifty. And I look my age. No denying it.

The only thing I'm saving is my hair.

To fix everything else, I would need plastic surgery, and liposuction, for my
man boobs.
 

JohnsonDDG

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,891
so_good.png


Precisely, the metric system is 100000 times better, more accurate, immediate and precise.

Besides, I'm " 1,76 cm " tall, not " 5'9'' " tall. Measuring height in feet and inches in 2017? Seriously, man? Seriously?
Metric is better in height because of accuracy
Imperial is better in weight for the same reason
 

Dante92

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,695
Metric is better in height because of accuracy
Imperial is better in weight for the same reason

Metric is better in both. As a matter of fact, it is used worldwide since it's simple, immediate and scientifically accurate. In metric, one milliliter of water occupies one cubic centimeter, weighs one gram, and requires one calorie of energy to heat up by one degree centigrade—which is 1% of the difference between its freezing point and its boiling point. An amount of hydrogen weighing the same amount has exactly one mole of atoms in it. Purely practical, both in height and weight.
 

JohnsonDDG

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,891
Metric is better in both. As a matter of fact, it is used worldwide since it's simple, immediate and scientifically accurate. In metric, one milliliter of water occupies one cubic centimeter, weighs one gram, and requires one calorie of energy to heat up by one degree centigrade—which is 1% of the difference between its freezing point and its boiling point. An amount of hydrogen weighing the same amount has exactly one mole of atoms in it. Purely practical, both in height and weight.
180lbs is so much more accurate then 81kg.
 

blackg

Senior Member
Reaction score
5,723
Keep mocking me, it that makes you feel better. It may help you regrow your hair, who knows. :)
I agree with you, Dante.
These fuckwits who mock others on here really piss me off!
This is a place to vent for f*** sake!
 

JohnsonDDG

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,891
I agree with you, Dante.
These fuckwits who mock others on here really piss me off!
This is a place to vent for f*** sake!
It was a misconstrued comment he was responding to.

I was saying that he has the most amounts of likes on the forum but it didn't come off right in the message.
 

CopeForLife

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,866
How exactly 180lbs is "much more accurate" than 81kg?

Because it divides on ten without remainder?
 

CopeForLife

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,866
Try to get 10% of 5'11.

giphy.gif


Convenient and accurate

YXATYnc.gif
 
Top