CaptainForehead
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 4,302
Suppose your chances with women were the same with and without hair. Just suppose. Then, would you care about baldness?
Which basically reduces the problem at what other people (specially women) think about you.HairPieceMan said:yes, no man wants to be bald, whether its julius ceaser or wayne roone, we all HATE it, even with social status, loads of money and women with or without hair we all still hate to have the absence of hair on our head.
unless your black or actually look good bald (extremely rare).
waldo said:simply no. its only about women for me
for all the socially enlightened let me elaborate:
if you are in a group of only men, any trait that makes you attractive to women and doesnt serve any other purpose than that is not gonna get you social-hierarchy-points.
being ripped obviously will, because this doesnt only make you attractive to women, but is also a display of physical power (probably one of the most social-hierarchy-relevant traits among male-only groups). being intelligent, same thing... problem solving skills are a trait of a leader. being tall, displays dominance etc etc
freaking hair however, doesnt do sh*t for you. thats why it would be of absolutely no significance whatsoever in male-only social groups. if anything, having hair makes you vulnerable because an opponent can control your head easily by holding onto it in a fight. two aspiring alphas get into a fistfight, assuming they are equal but one has longish hair, one shaved his nw7, the shaved guy has a clear advantage.
little edit: i actually felt 100% comfortable with my shaved nw4 around my nw1 male friends, because i am a relatively confident guy. now if you happen to have some self esteem issues because you are skinny, short, fat or whatever, i can imagine being bald on top of that would make you feel even more miserable among men.
s.a.f said:As for the original question I just cant imagine what a world without women would be like, (even though I live/work in a allmost totally male oriented enviroment) so cant really answer the question.
uncomfortable man said:I understand the point of this thread is to find a logical path to "not caring" about baldness by imposing the hypothetical that women either don't care about baldness or don't exist all together but how is it actually helpful? Women exist, and they don't prefer bald guys here in the real world.
THAT is bad UM. Dont be self hating.uncomfortable man said:A few days ago something happened that just ruined me for the next couple of days.
HairPieceMan said:similar thing happened with me, i was bald and had a very hot dentist, she was used to seeing me bald, then i wore a hair system and had another appointment with her.
she had that "wtf i can barely recognise you and you look 10x better now with hair" type look, it was like I basically became a human being to her just by having hair.
Correct, but different does not mean inferior.HairPieceMan said:it makes you different and has always been considered a genetic weakness.
HairPieceMan said:as UMan says if society puts you down you cannot help but hate yourself for that trait, you get self worth by appraisal of other people, if you take a test and fail you then feel bad, so you feel worthless, in the same way if someone reacts to you negatively based purely on some physical attribute you feel self loathing.
these things sound like perfectly natural feelings for a human being to have.
HairPieceMan said:like it or not male pattern baldness is a genetic "flaw" (aka weakness) in the human race.
it is unnatural, human beings are MEANT TO have hair on their scalp.
to be bald is an unnatural act, it's not what humans are "meant to be".
Been to western europe?HairPieceMan said:can you imagine walking into a club and seeing 75 bald guys and only 25 guys with hair, you'd think your on planet mars!
HairPieceMan said:like it or not male pattern baldness is a genetic "flaw" (aka weakness) in the human race.
it is unnatural, human beings are MEANT TO have hair on their scalp.
to be bald is an unnatural act, it's not what humans are "meant to be".
it doesn't matter how people view bald men at this current point in time, maybe some people view it as a sign of inteligence at the moment, just like having long hair was rebelious at one time...these are social views at a current point in time.
maybe in 100 years being bald will mean your gay, the social views of a grooming choice at the moment is irrelivant.
it is still a genetic flaw (weakness), yeah it is purely visual but that doesn't discount the fact that it is a flaw to hopefully be cured eventually.
also although irrelevant there is way more negativity for baldness than there is positivity, terms "hair loss sufferer" and "hair loss cure soon" implies that it's a problem to be fixed, what if everyman was bald, that would look wierd, people would think there is something "wrong" with men, so why is it ok for only 2% of men to be bald, it isn''t that is why.
put it this way if severe hairloss affected 75% of men in their 20s hairloss would be a BIG problem to be solved purely becuase it affects more people, but the fact that it is in the minority it's not such a big problem anymore, sounds like a load of rubbish to me.
can you imagine walking into a club and seeing 75 bald guys and only 25 guys with hair, you'd think your on planet mars!
HairPieceMan said:like it or not male pattern baldness is a genetic "flaw" (aka weakness) in the human race.
it is unnatural, human beings are MEANT TO have hair on their scalp.
to be bald is an unnatural act, it's not what humans are "meant to be".
it doesn't matter how people view bald men at this current point in time, maybe some people view it as a sign of inteligence at the moment, just like having long hair was rebelious at one time...these are social views at a current point in time.
maybe in 100 years being bald will mean your gay, the social views of a grooming choice at the moment is irrelivant.
it is still a genetic flaw (weakness), yeah it is purely visual but that doesn't discount the fact that it is a flaw to hopefully be cured eventually.
also although irrelevant there is way more negativity for baldness than there is positivity, terms "hair loss sufferer" and "hair loss cure soon" implies that it's a problem to be fixed, what if everyman was bald, that would look wierd, people would think there is something "wrong" with men, so why is it ok for only 2% of men to be bald, it isn''t that is why.
put it this way if severe hairloss affected 75% of men in their 20s hairloss would be a BIG problem to be solved purely becuase it affects more people, but the fact that it is in the minority it's not such a big problem anymore, sounds like a load of rubbish to me.
can you imagine walking into a club and seeing 75 bald guys and only 25 guys with hair, you'd think your on planet mars!