I'm looking for a crazy study....

CCS

Senior Member
Reaction score
27
OK, I'll buy an ounce of 0.025% from Lee and dilute it to make 0.001% in 25oz of minoxidil. No peel for me, but it sounds worth a try, if it will reduce the number of androgen receptors.
 

docj077

Senior Member
Reaction score
1
Well, I think that I finally found one piece of what I'm looking for with regards to the link between androgens and TGF-beta. The study below involves the prostate, but it's what I needed to know with regards to androgens, the androgen receptor, TGF-beta, and Smads. This demonstrates the link between all these molecules. It's a different tissue, but the receptor should work the same.

Here's the abstract:

http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/277/2/1240

The Androgen Receptor Represses Transforming Growth Factor- Signaling through Interaction with Smad3*

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1240-1248, January 11, 2002

In the prostate, androgens negatively regulate the expression of transforming growth factor- (TGF-) ligands and receptors and Smad activation through unknown mechanisms. We show that androgens (dihydrotestosterone and R1881) down-regulate TGF-1-induced expression of TGF-1, c-Fos, and Egr-1 in the human prostate adenocarcinoma cell line, LNCaP. Moreover, 5-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) inhibits TGF-1 activation of three TGF-1-responsive promoter constructs, 3TP-luciferase, AP-1-luciferase, and SBE4BV-luciferase, in LNCaP cells either with or without enforced expression of TGF- receptors (TRI and TRII). Similarly, DHT inhibits the activation of Smad-binding element (SBE)4BV-luciferase by either constitutively activated TRI (T204D) or constitutively activated Smad3 (S3*). Activation of SBE4BV-luciferase by S3* in the NRP-154 prostatic cell line, which is androgen receptor (AR)-negative but highly responsive to TGF-1, is blocked by co-transfection with either full-length AR or AR missing the DNA binding domain. Immunoprecipitation and GST pull-down assays show that AR directly associates with Smad3 but not Smad2 or Smad4. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicate that the AR ligand binding domain directly inhibits the association of Smad3 to the Smad-binding element. In conclusion, our data demonstrate for the first time that ligand-bound AR inhibits TGF- transcriptional responses through selectively repressing the binding of Smad3 to SBE.



This is an angry study filled with a lot of biochemistry, but the bolded part is the most important aspect of this study.

Now, I would need to see a study demonstrating what I'm about to type, but this is how my mind works.

Normally, the androgen receptor inhibits TGF transcriptional activity which means that androgens normally inhibit all downstream effects of TGF-beta. However, in an individual with an abnormal androgen receptor in the scalp, which is what happens in male pattern baldness baldness with triplet repeats creating a dysfunctional receptor, TGF-beta transcriptional activity is no longer repressed and all downstream effects can continue including fibrosis and collagen deposition through fibroblast activation and connective tissue growth factor expression.

It's short and it's sweet, but I think that might be what actually happens. But, remember that this is in-vitro, so I still need to see a study that links a faulty androgen receptor to not only increased TGF-beta (which we have), but also to the removal of any repression of the binding of Smad3 to SBE

Something else that needs to be addressed is the how 5AR inhibitory drugs actually grow hair. To be honest, I don't know. It would seem to me that DHT inhibition wouldn't have a role either way in this pathway as it's the androgen receptor that's the problem, not DHT. Androgen binding to a faulty androgen receptor shouldn't matter unless androgen binding still causes the activation/inhibition of another process along with the faulty receptor failing to inhibit TGF-beta's processes.

Also, I still can't explain why this only happens in the scalp other than embryological patterning and that still doesn't explain why all androgen receptors aren't faulty.
 

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
42
docj077 said:
Now, I would need to see a study demonstrating what I'm about to type, but this is how my mind works.

Normally, the androgen receptor inhibits TGF transcriptional activity which means that androgens normally inhibit all downstream effects of TGF-beta. However, in an individual with an abnormal androgen receptor in the scalp, which is what happens in male pattern baldness baldness with triplet repeats creating a dysfunctional receptor, TGF-beta transcriptional activity is no longer repressed and all downstream effects can continue including fibrosis and collagen deposition through fibroblast activation and connective tissue growth factor expression.

It's short and it's sweet, but I think that might be what actually happens.

Docj, I think you're on a wild-goose chase. Most, BUT NOT ALL balding men have that "abnormal" androgen receptor. I think it clearly just alters the overall strength of the androgenic response, it doesn't alter it qualitatively.

Bryan
 

docj077

Senior Member
Reaction score
1
Bryan said:
docj077 said:
Now, I would need to see a study demonstrating what I'm about to type, but this is how my mind works.

Normally, the androgen receptor inhibits TGF transcriptional activity which means that androgens normally inhibit all downstream effects of TGF-beta. However, in an individual with an abnormal androgen receptor in the scalp, which is what happens in male pattern baldness baldness with triplet repeats creating a dysfunctional receptor, TGF-beta transcriptional activity is no longer repressed and all downstream effects can continue including fibrosis and collagen deposition through fibroblast activation and connective tissue growth factor expression.

It's short and it's sweet, but I think that might be what actually happens.

Docj, I think you're on a wild-goose chase. Most, BUT NOT ALL balding men have that "abnormal" androgen receptor. I think it clearly just alters the overall strength of the androgenic response, it doesn't alter it qualitatively.

Bryan

I think you're probably right. I'm just trying to figure out how an androgen receptor with a repeat mutation can lead to TGF-beta upregulation and fibrosis. I'm hoping to figure out the steps in between, but I don't think there is enough scientific research out there to help me.

I'm just going to give up on this for now.
 

CCS

Senior Member
Reaction score
27
but you still think blocking the androgen receptor site helps, right?
 

CCS

Senior Member
Reaction score
27
goingat20 just posted that he looked at a study bryan posted, which showed that RU in the vehicle used on some monkeys regrew more hair than high doses of finasteride. Since it blocks testosterone as well as DHT, it should have a higher potential than any 5ar blocker. It would be nice if something binder would tell the AR to do the opposite, like the body hair AR's, instead of just being neutral.
 

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
42
collegechemistrystudent said:
It would be nice if something binder would tell the AR to do the opposite, like the body hair AR's, instead of just being neutral.

It's not the AR that determines that. It's something else.
 

abcdefg

Senior Member
Reaction score
782
Not to come in and say something stupid, but in practical terms what is someone losing there hair supposed to do? How can this be applied to stopping or slowing hairloss?
 
Top