- Reaction score
- 44
Did you read the ingredients or nahSo to be clear, in summary you don’t know if it works but you’re acting as if you know for a fact that it doesn’t work..?
Did you read the ingredients or nahSo to be clear, in summary you don’t know if it works but you’re acting as if you know for a fact that it doesn’t work..?
Did you read the ingredients or nah
So basically every single card is showing this product is a scam, yet you believe it will work. At 27 years old you should have more senseI did
So basically every single card is showing this product is a scam, yet you believe it will work. At 27 years old you should have more sense
You realise that S-equol has had more comparable success in shrinking enlarged prostates in animals vs some AA compounds..
This lotion is on the same level as natural product. The oils and amino acids might react similar to actual chemical compounds but it’s the same as saying “rub ginger root on your head, it reacts in the scalp similart to minoxidil
So basically every single card is showing this product is a scam, yet you believe it will work. At 27 years old you should have more sense
Im saying you cant argue from just looking at the ingredients the products worth because studies lend merit to the efficacy of s-equol. Whether it will be equally as effective in humans in a topical remains to be officially confirmed.
DGLA also is documented as a Vasodilator...again the comparison to Min is yet to be seen.
1. No visual evidence that it works 2. The conference presentation on the product was underwelming 3. The ingredients are crap and not innovative at all... there’s legit not one shred of evidence that this product works and there are countless facts showing it’s a bust. This product is literally hyped up on a foundation of toothpicks. Do you believe in Santa? srsWhat cards are these ?
Just because something has an effect on the prostate does not automatically mean it does anything for hair. Just because something is a vasodilator does not mean it does anything for hair. If you would use that same logic you could argue that therefore it can also have the combined side effect profile of both.
1. No visual evidence that it works 2. The conference presentation on the product was underwelming 3. The ingredients are crap and not innovative at all... there’s legit not one shred of evidence that this product works and there are countless facts showing it’s a bust. This product is literally hyped up on a foundation of toothpicks. Do you believe in Santa? srs
Do me a favor my son. Go to google search and type Rogaine results. You’ll see results 10x better than that garbage, but the vast majority knows minoxidil does very little for the majority. Seriously man.. I would expect this from some of the young guys year like 19-22... but you’re 27... you should really have more life experience and understanding than you have. I feel sorry for you.In regard to the pics shared on post #26259 on page 1313, you see no visual evidence in not one of those pictures and not one shred of evidence it works ?
Please name the countless facts showing that this is a bust.
Do me a favor my son. Go to google search and type Rogaine results. You’ll see results 10x better than that garbage, but the vast majority knows minoxidil does very little for the majority. Seriously man.. I would expect this from some of the young guys year like 19-22... but you’re 27... you should really have more life experience and understanding than you have. I feel sorry for you.
Do me a favor my son. Go to google search and type Rogaine results. You’ll see results 10x better than that garbage, but the vast majority knows minoxidil does very little for the majority. Seriously man.. I would expect this from some of the young guys year like 19-22... but you’re 27... you should really have more life experience and understanding than you have. I feel sorry for you.
Yes. Rogaine is a scam in that it doesn’t regrow hair in 80% of men and it’s far from being a viable solution to hair loss. So.. ya. You got my point.So rogaine must be a scam as well according to your logic.
If minoxidil reinstates blood flow but it’s short lived as you say, what makes you think brotzu lotion will be more effective and long lasting? Because it’s supposedly going to attack dht on the scalp? Minoxidil doesn’t work because it can’t penetrate the scalp effectively. Nothing applied topically will be able to penetrate the scalp deep enough to be effective and if it does, you’ll be sides.The reason minoxidil only works for some is that the majority of people don't have enough sulfotransferase enzyme to convert minoxidil into its active counterpart. minoxidil results are often short lived because all it does it reinstate blood flow to the follicle. Even if those Brotzu results are 'garbage' they should at least be continually progressive and long lasting as it helps reinstate blood flow whilst reducing the effects of DHT at the receptor.
If minoxidil reinstates blood flow but it’s short lived as you say, what makes you think brotzu lotion will be more effective and long lasting? Because it’s supposedly going to attack dht on the scalp? Minoxidil doesn’t work because it can’t penetrate the scalp effectively. Nothing applied topically will be able to penetrate the scalp deep enough to be effective and if it does, you’ll be sides.
If minoxidil reinstates blood flow but it’s short lived as you say, what makes you think brotzu lotion will be more effective and long lasting? Because it’s supposedly going to attack dht on the scalp? Minoxidil doesn’t work because it can’t penetrate the scalp effectively. Nothing applied topically will be able to penetrate the scalp deep enough to be effective and if it does, you’ll be sides.