Harie
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 5
Bryan said:Sorry, but I'd still like to see some serious scientific evidence for that, not just something that gets stated by one person, then gets repeated by someone else, then by someone else, then by someone else, ad nauseum.
Like I said, there are not many studies on which form of Arginine is more effective. Since I have not found more than a few places where their effectiveness is compared, in comes the body builder reviews. I had said before that you should try taking 3g of L-Arginine one day, and 3g of Di-Arginine a few days later and compare. The "pump" isn't even in the same ballpark.
Who are you talking about?? Pearson & Shaw? For the third time, they use pure arginine in their supplements. I just did a Google search on them, and the ads say in plain English that they still contain ARGININE. Not APG, or any other form. Where did you get the idea that they use APG?
I googled them as well and looked at their line of supps. The Arginine supplement they sell uses all 3 forms of Arginine. I'll find the link tonight when I'm not at work (lots of sites dealing with supps/drugs are blocked).
LOL! I can guarantee you that it was the Isidori study that they were referring to! It was the Isidori study which claimed that there's a synergistic effect when taking APG and lysine together that's powerful enough that GH release was significant even at the shockingly low dose of only 1,200 mg apiece. Now go back and take another look at that text you posted from that site, plus the next couple of sentences after it.
We're talking about 2 different links. I'm in reference to the futurescience link where they talked about how APG crosses the brain/blood barrier easier. In the futurescience link, they have a reference page and no where on that page is Isidori even mentioned.