- Reaction score
- 594
Androgen receptor upregulation is a significant cause for concern for me, and I'm sure for many of you too. Obviously, having more androgen receptors means that androgens, even at lower levels, may cause continuous Androgenetic Alopecia. As a result, even if we continue to take finasteride/dutasteride, we might expect that at some point, AR upregulation would mean hair loss starts again.
Now I had held off on starting dutasteride for this reason, I wanted more DHT suppression, but I've read many comments stating that stronger DHT inhibitors would lead to increased AR upregulation, thus you should only switch to dutasteride after finasteride has lost its effectiveness.
Now here comes my hypothesis: Inhibiting DHT does NOT cause AR upregulation. finasteride and dutasteride don't lower overall androgens, they just result in less Testosterone from being converted to DHT, and as such, overall andogens should remain the same, just more testosterone, which also binds with AR receptors and less DHT, which causes male pattern baldness.
So any thoughts on this idea? Anyone with greater knowledge of physiology/biochemistry/cell biology have any insights?
Also, if DHT inhibitors don't cause AR upregulation, why is it that many men notice an increase in hair loss 6-8 years into DHT treatment? I've considered that it could still be AR upregulation, but due to the progressive reduction in testosterone that occurs as we age,,, I've also considered that it could be a cumulative effect of even low levels of DHT over the years, in which case we should use the strongest DHT inhibitors available as early as possible.
So any thoughts/insight anyone?
Now I had held off on starting dutasteride for this reason, I wanted more DHT suppression, but I've read many comments stating that stronger DHT inhibitors would lead to increased AR upregulation, thus you should only switch to dutasteride after finasteride has lost its effectiveness.
Now here comes my hypothesis: Inhibiting DHT does NOT cause AR upregulation. finasteride and dutasteride don't lower overall androgens, they just result in less Testosterone from being converted to DHT, and as such, overall andogens should remain the same, just more testosterone, which also binds with AR receptors and less DHT, which causes male pattern baldness.
So any thoughts on this idea? Anyone with greater knowledge of physiology/biochemistry/cell biology have any insights?
Also, if DHT inhibitors don't cause AR upregulation, why is it that many men notice an increase in hair loss 6-8 years into DHT treatment? I've considered that it could still be AR upregulation, but due to the progressive reduction in testosterone that occurs as we age,,, I've also considered that it could be a cumulative effect of even low levels of DHT over the years, in which case we should use the strongest DHT inhibitors available as early as possible.
So any thoughts/insight anyone?