Need some advice with my regimen.

[Jacob]

Unfortunately...the time-stamps say different. Your post you're referring to there is the 8:33 one. While it's possible it took you forever to think of something to say while I was editing my post, it's also possible that you left it out. One thing you cannot say- is that I'm lying. Here it is again:

Once again Bryan gets put to shame.

Here is my post, with the included Edit time-stamp, underlined:

So in other words, Proctor lied about the 3 year comprehensive clinical study.

"not all its ingredients are even fully known" is snake-oil talk..and anyone putting that on their head would be insane, if true.

You didn't present squat. I am the one that posted those "rave reviews" in this thread...as well as other, more believable(you know..more recent at the time of your original posting of the list..and from long-term posters) reviews. Will Brink has become a joke on this subject..just like you.


Last edited by Jacob on Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Here is the time of Bryan's post: 8:33 pm

So..as I've been saying all this time. It is Proctor who is the liar. And you're filling his shoes quite nicely.

 

[majorsixth]

Originally posted by Bryan
which I carefully documented with before-and-after pictures. Prox-N fully maintained my hair (did a little BETTER than maintain my hair, actually), during those two full years

This is complete nonsense You have used the word MAINTAIN

:thumbdown2: Get real ! You have the cheek to tell everyone that minoxidil can't maintain hair, you even take pride in producing Price's study to back you up.
Yet here your telling everyone some snake oil with completely ZERO clinical support does :spam:

 

[majorsixth]

Originally posted by Bryan
which I carefully documented with before-and-after pictures. Prox-N fully maintained my hair (did a little BETTER than maintain my hair, actually), during those two full years

This is complete nonsense You have used the word MAINTAIN

:thumbdown2: Get real ! You have the cheek to tell everyone that minoxidil can't maintain hair, you even take pride in producing Price's study to back you up.
Yet here your telling everyone some snake oil with completely ZERO clinical support does :spam:

 

[Bryan]

This is complete nonsense You have used the word MAINTAIN

:thumbdown2: Get real ! You have the cheek to tell everyone that minoxidil can't maintain hair, you even take pride in producing Price's study to back you up.
Yet here your telling everyone some snake oil with completely ZERO clinical support does :spam:

Really? Which one of the Three Stooges (Moe, Curly, Larry) do you aspire to be?

 

[shocktop311]

Bryan, I searched through almost all of your posts and no success story. Post hard evidence that proxiphen worked for you or leave the forums. We're all tired of you egging on newcomers to the site who simply want help. If proxiphen is spool amazing then why did you only use it off and on. Everybody knows one of the main dukes regarding hairloss is to stick to a treatment for as long as it works. Are you saying it became ineffective after only two years of use?

 

[shocktop311]

Main rules*

 

[majorsixth]

This is complete nonsense You have used the word MAINTAIN

:thumbdown2: Get real ! You have the cheek to tell everyone that minoxidil can't maintain hair, you even take pride in producing Price's study to back you up.
Yet here your telling everyone some snake oil with completely ZERO clinical support does :spam:

Really? Which one of the Three Stooges (Moe, Curly, Larry) do you aspire to be?

I've given the facts here, that you are actually stating that a Non proven home made snake oil is better then proven clinically tested product


Do you even realise how RETARDED This ridiculous response Makes you look ? :shakehead:

 

[majorsixth]

Originally posted by Shocktop311
Are you saying it became ineffective after only two years of use?

Sorry to burst your bubble here, but the shil as not got any evidence that the crap works at all PERIOD

 

[ericando12]

What your veritable trouble?

 

[israelite]

we will know wthe truth very soon!

 

[Bryan]

Bryan, I searched through almost all of your posts and no success story. Post hard evidence that proxiphen worked for you or leave the forums... If proxiphen is spool amazing then why did you only use it off and on. Everybody knows one of the main dukes regarding hairloss is to stick to a treatment for as long as it works. Are you saying it became ineffective after only two years of use?

I only used Proxiphen very minimally. As I've explained many many times, the main thing that I used over the years was Prox-N, not Proxiphen. It fully maintained my hair for the two full years in my before-and-after pictures.

So why did I use Proxiphen only minimally? Because the stuff is very expensive. (Something else that I've explained numerous times, but you apparently haven't been listening.)

 

[Bryan]

I've given the facts here, that you are actually stating that a Non proven home made snake oil is better then proven clinically tested product

Do you even realise how RETARDED This ridiculous response Makes you look ? :shakehead:

I got a BIG laugh out of it! :mrgreen:

 

[Bryan]

Sorry to burst your bubble here, but the shil as not got any evidence that the crap works at all PERIOD

Yeah, I guess all those people who wrote the "rave reviews" of it were just LYING about it! LOL!!

 

[majorsixth]

Sorry to burst your bubble here, but the shil as not got any evidence that the crap works at all PERIOD

Yeah, I guess all those people who wrote the "rave reviews" of it were just LYING about it! LOL!!

These 12 year old comments show that the stuff is no good. This is because products that actually work gain credit and popularity over the years when they really work.

What popularity can you show in relation to proxiphen that's up todate? Nothing! Therefore it's clear it's basically expensive rubbish.

If proxiphen was as effective as you say, it wouldn't need a second rate salesman YOU trying to promote it would it?

 

[Jacob]

Bryan, I searched through almost all of your posts and no success story. Post hard evidence that proxiphen worked for you or leave the forums... If proxiphen is spool amazing then why did you only use it off and on. Everybody knows one of the main dukes regarding hairloss is to stick to a treatment for as long as it works. Are you saying it became ineffective after only two years of use?

I only used Proxiphen very minimally. As I've explained many many times, the main thing that I used over the years was Prox-N, not Proxiphen. It fully maintained my hair for the two full years in my before-and-after pictures.

So why did I use Proxiphen only minimally? Because the stuff is very expensive. (Something else that I've explained numerous times, but you apparently haven't been listening.)

And amazingly those pictures are so great you don't even have them anymore. Nor does HairLossTalk.com have them on the page talking about this: http://www.hairlosstalk.com/hair-loss-news/article196.php
And of course we're supposed to believe anything Bryan says- he never makes anything up! Not that the pictures proved anything- I recall them not showing much..same bad quality as those on Proctor's site..etc.

And there's the cost excuse again. No pictures with your Proxiphen usage, only supposed "maintenance" with the N version- which you also didn't continue with either because it works so well. And of course you no longer use ANY shampoo...so you don't use NANO either. Must be GREAT stuff!

 

[Bryan]

Yeah, I guess all those people who wrote the "rave reviews" of it were just LYING about it! LOL!!

These 12 year old comments show that the stuff is no good. This is because products that actually work gain credit and popularity over the years when they really work.

ROTFLMAO!!! BWAHAHAHA!! So is THAT the only way you have to try so desperately to explain those rave reviews?? You're not even going to make an ATTEMPT to talk about its expense, or the fact that almost nobody even knows about it nowadays (those reviews were entirely from alt.baldspot, where Dr. Proctor was a regular poster)? Nowadays he hasn't bothered to advertise it, which is a shame for people who really need it.

 

[majorsixth]

Originally posted by Bryan
Proctor was a regular poster)? Nowadays he hasn't bothered to advertise it, which is a shame for people who really need it.

Actually i believe it's a blessing that it's hardly known or advertised, but this hasn't stopped you trying to shil the junk. :spam: mer :thumbdown2:

 

[Bryan]

And amazingly those pictures are so great you don't even have them anymore.

Oh, I definitely have the original Polaroids (or whatever those instant pics were called back in those days). They're right here safely stored-away in a drawer. I have no idea why the jpegs were eventually removed from HairLossTalk.com.

Nor does HairLossTalk.com have them on the page talking about this: http://www.hairlosstalk.com/hair-loss-news/article196.php
And of course we're supposed to believe anything Bryan says- he never makes anything up!

I DON'T ever make anything up. I've never told a lie to you in the entire time you and I have "known" each other. That's more than I can say about YOU.

Not that the pictures proved anything- I recall them not showing much..same bad quality as those on Proctor's site..etc.

I tend to agree with you: they DON'T show very much, just a slight improvement after two full years.

And there's the cost excuse again. No pictures with your Proxiphen usage, only supposed "maintenance" with the N version- which you also didn't continue with either because it works so well. And of course you no longer use ANY shampoo...so you don't use NANO either. Must be GREAT stuff!

Oh, I use shampoo, just not NANO shampoo. I'm not a wealthy person, I can't afford to use Proxiphen nowadays. Does it SHOCK you to hear me admit that? Why?? I talk about its expense every time I mention it to other people.

 

[Bryan]

Actually i believe it's a blessing that it's hardly known or advertised, but this hasn't stopped you trying to shil the junk. :spam: mer :thumbdown2:

So what do you want me to call you? "Moe", "Curly", or "Larry"? :laugh:

 

[majorsixth]

Actually i believe it's a blessing that it's hardly known or advertised, but this hasn't stopped you trying to shil the junk. :spam: mer :thumbdown2:

So what do you want me to call you? "Moe", "Curly", or "Larry"? :laugh:

What i would like you to do is to cease :spam: ing a snake oil that has zero clinically backing. Try just being advocater of solid true advice, rather then pushing crap !