Oknow gives terrible advice for online dating

[Caillou]

Good looks have nothing to do with good genetics, this is just typical pseudoscientifc evolutionary psychology garbage

We just like things that look good whether they're humans or whatever, that's all there to itn

 

[spring15]

Following on from negative comments regarding England dating & in general

-Worst accent in the anglosphere
-Well known shows internationally; Jeremy Kyle - epicenter of global white trash. Coronation street - horrible soap , Geordie shore - cracked out Spice girls
-Concrete jungle, houses majority comprised of brick looks hideous
-Overpopulated for an island of it's size
-Shithouse at Cricket & Rugby - though decent at Soccer?

 

[Diffused_confidence]

Good looks have nothing to do with good genetics, this is just typical pseudoscientifc evolutionary psychology garbage

We just like things that look good whether they're humans or whatever, that's all there to itn

So good looks comes from hard work? Please.

 

[Caillou]

So good looks comes from hard work? Please.

That's not what I meant, of course good looks are genetic. But having good or bad genetics doesn't necessarily mean you'd have good or bad looks

 

[doubleindemnity]

That's not what I meant, of course good looks are genetic. But having good or bad genetics doesn't necessarily mean you'd have good or bad looks

Aren't looks an indicator of genetics? You are just saying what some book said to me. We are attracted to indicators of health not the actual health. A tall guy is always more attractive than a short guy even though short live longer.

 

[norwood_spotter]

Aren't looks an indicator of genetics? You are just saying what some book said to me. We are attracted to indicators of health not the actual health. A tall guy is always more attractive than a short guy even though short live longer.

Fisherian runaway - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Caillou]

Aren't looks an indicator of genetics? You are just saying what some book said to me. We are attracted to indicators of health not the actual health. A tall guy is always more attractive than a short guy even though short live longer.

No, they're not, this is just bullshit pseudoscience. And I will prove it right now

Take this guy for instance:-

- 6'8
- Strong as f***
- Ultra-masculine Jaw
- Clear skin
- Fullhead of hair in his 40's
- Would kill 95% of men with his bare hands
- Martial arts expert

According to evolutionary psychology, this guy should be good looking as f*** considering his genes. And women should all be soaking wet for him. Yet 99% of his fans are men and women don't give a single f*** about him

Then we have this guy:-

- Looks indistinguishable from a female except for his jaw
- The average man would snap him in half
- Twink frame
- Feminine body language
- Wouldn't last a minute in a war or a real fight
- Attention whoring mentally weak pussy

This guy should be unattractive as f*** due to all those extremely unmasculine traits. Yet 99% of his fans are prime girls thirsting for him and would spread their legs for him on command unlike the first guy who most likely would have to resort to rape to get pussy if there were no laws

It's all just bullshit lottery about how your genes manifest whether they're good or bad. Also ugly parents can have good looking children in many cases and I can attest to that personally as most of the Chad I know have mediocre looking parents. My parents were average looking when they were young and I look like sh*t, so it doesn't really mean anything

You could literally be born with superhuman strength, a flawless immune system and an extremely masculine personality and no woman would give a sh*t about you if you're ugly or bald. But you could be a weak twink who's a massive pussy and catches cold from exposing his arms to some wind and you could have the healthiest prime females interested in you because you look aesthetically pleasing or have good hair

Women are absolutely f*****g retarded and the whole argument on good genes stemming from some dogshit pseudoscientific evolutionary psychology is just an excuse by atheist cuckolds and feminists to give a pass to women to wh*** as much as they please. Women shouldn't be allowed to make a choice when it comes to most things because they lead to the degeneration of humanity due to their retardation and poor choices. Ideally they shouldn't leave their houses and roam in society except under specific circumstances

 

[Oknow]

No, they're not, this is just bullshit pseudoscience. And I will prove it right now

Take this guy for instance:-

View attachment 178895


- 6'8
- Strong as f***
- Ultra-masculine Jaw
- Clear skin
- Fullhead of hair in his 40's
- Would kill 95% of men with his bare hands
- Martial arts expert

According to evolutionary psychology, this guy should be good looking as f*** considering his genes. And women should all be soaking wet for him. Yet 99% of his fans are men and women don't give a single f*** about him

Then we have this guy:-

View attachment 178896

- Looks indistinguishable from a female except for his jaw
- The average man would snap him in half
- Twink frame
- Feminine body language
- Wouldn't last a minute in a war or a real fight
- Attention whoring mentally weak pussy

This guy should be unattractive as f*** due to all those extremely unmasculine traits. Yet 99% of his fans are prime girls thirsting for him and would spread their legs for him on command unlike the first guy who most likely would have to resort to rape to get pussy if there were no laws

It's all just bullshit lottery about how your genes manifest whether they're good or bad. Also ugly parents can have good looking children in many cases and I can attest to that personally as most of the Chad I know have mediocre looking parents. My parents were average looking when they were young and I look like sh*t, so it doesn't really mean anything

You could literally be born with superhuman strength, a flawless immune system and an extremely masculine personality and no woman would give a sh*t about you if you're ugly or bald. But you could be a weak twink who's a massive pussy and catches cold from exposing his arms to some wind and you could have the healthiest prime females interested in you because you look aesthetically pleasing or have good hair

Women are absolutely f*****g retarded and the whole argument on good genes stemming from some dogshit pseudoscientific evolutionary psychology is just an excuse by atheist cuckolds and feminists to give a pass to women to wh*** as much as they please. Women shouldn't be allowed to make a choice when it comes to most things because they lead to the degeneration of humanity due to their retardation and poor choices. Ideally they shouldn't leave their houses and roam in society except under specific circumstances

just goes to show that women are lesbians

 

[Caillou]

just goes to show that women are lesbians

Unironically true actually. Most women would rather f*** other women than f*** most guys

I don't even see women as human beings anymore but more like degenerate sentient bots with no self-awareness or self-control. I wonder why God created them in the first place

 

[DyingOfTheLight]

No, they're not, this is just bullshit pseudoscience. And I will prove it right now

Take this guy for instance:-

View attachment 178895


- 6'8
- Strong as f***
- Ultra-masculine Jaw
- Clear skin
- Fullhead of hair in his 40's
- Would kill 95% of men with his bare hands
- Martial arts expert

According to evolutionary psychology, this guy should be good looking as f*** considering his genes. And women should all be soaking wet for him. Yet 99% of his fans are men and women don't give a single f*** about him

Then we have this guy:-

View attachment 178896

- Looks indistinguishable from a female except for his jaw
- The average man would snap him in half
- Twink frame
- Feminine body language
- Wouldn't last a minute in a war or a real fight
- Attention whoring mentally weak pussy

This guy should be unattractive as f*** due to all those extremely unmasculine traits. Yet 99% of his fans are prime girls thirsting for him and would spread their legs for him on command unlike the first guy who most likely would have to resort to rape to get pussy if there were no laws

It's all just bullshit lottery about how your genes manifest whether they're good or bad. Also ugly parents can have good looking children in many cases and I can attest to that personally as most of the Chad I know have mediocre looking parents. My parents were average looking when they were young and I look like sh*t, so it doesn't really mean anything

You could literally be born with superhuman strength, a flawless immune system and an extremely masculine personality and no woman would give a sh*t about you if you're ugly or bald. But you could be a weak twink who's a massive pussy and catches cold from exposing his arms to some wind and you could have the healthiest prime females interested in you because you look aesthetically pleasing or have good hair

Women are absolutely f*****g retarded and the whole argument on good genes stemming from some dogshit pseudoscientific evolutionary psychology is just an excuse by atheist cuckolds and feminists to give a pass to women to wh*** as much as they please. Women shouldn't be allowed to make a choice when it comes to most things because they lead to the degeneration of humanity due to their retardation and poor choices. Ideally they shouldn't leave their houses and roam in society except under specific circumstances

'Good genes' is not some absolute measure, it only has meaning within a certain environment (= your mating success within that environment)

In prehistoric times your first example would be the pinnacle of evolution, but times change and so does the evolutionary context.

Still, both your examples have 'good genes' even by today's standards. The first, while not some teen heartrob twink eboy, still has a much higher chance of procreating than your average modern male. Who's weak and feminised af, but without being pretty like your second example

 

[Caillou]

'Good genes' is not some absolute measure, it only has meaning within a certain environment (= your mating success within that environment)

In prehistoric times your first example would be the pinnacle of evolution, but times change and so does the evolutionary context.

Still, both your examples have 'good genes' even by today's standards. The first, while not some teen heartrob twink eboy, still has a much higher chance of procreating than your average modern male. Who's weak and feminised af, but without being pretty like your second example

The second guy has sh*t genes regardless of the time he's living in, and the first guy has good genes regardless of the time he's living in. The second guy's genes make him vulnerable and weak, thus unable to provide protection or become masculine under most circumstances. Also the average male has much higher appeal to women than the first guy, ask any woman if you don't believe me

Evolutionary psychology and "sexual selection being based on good genes for survival" is all just a bunch of horseshit for low IQ plebs. No wonder evolutionary psychology is based on nothing but assumptions and sh*t with zero evidence other than "it makes sense this way". The Fisherian runaway is much more aligned with reality and has solid evidence to support it at least

 

[DyingOfTheLight]

The second guy has sh*t genes regardless of the time he's living in, and the first guy has good genes regardless of the time he's living in. The second guy's genes make him vulnerable and weak, thus unable to provide protection or become masculine under most circumstances. Also the average male has much higher appeal to women than the first guy, ask any woman if you don't believe me

Evolutionary psychology and "sexual selection being based on good genes for survival" is all just a bunch of horseshit for low IQ plebs. No wonder evolutionary psychology is based on nothing but assumptions and sh*t with zero evidence other than "it makes sense this way". The Fisherian runaway is much more aligned with reality and has solid evidence to support it at least

If you define 'good genes' as mating success, than your second example has great genes. It's all relative; being traditionally masculine doesn't mean sh*t anymore when it comes to attracting young women. The state has largely taken over the function of protector from the individual man. That facet of masculinity has become pretty irrelevant in the West.

Still, you'll often hear women saying that they want to feel protected by their SO. I don't think it's that binary. Look at all those girls simping over tall men. Sure it's status symbol to have a tall bf, but the feeling of being protected also plays a role. Even if he's a skinny twink. Because for women it's only about the feeling, not reality.

Funny thing is if you disregard his faggy hair, style and physical weakness, the skull of that second guy is pretty robust. Strong mandible, masculine eye area, wide cheekbones. If you give him a buzzcut, a wider neck and put 40lbs of muscle on his frame, you'll get a totally different picture.

The problem is that modern women prefer prettiness over masculinity, which causes men to become more feminine and thus slowly collapses our traditional value system

 

[Caillou]

If you define 'good genes' as mating success, than your second example has great genes. It's all relative; being traditionally masculine doesn't mean sh*t anymore when it comes to attracting young women. The state has largely taken over the function of protector from the individual man. That facet of masculinity has become pretty irrelevant in the West.

Still, you'll often hear women saying that they want to feel protected by their SO. I don't think it's that binary. Look at all those girls simping over tall men. Sure it's status symbol to have a tall bf, but the feeling of being protected also plays a role. Even if he's a skinny twink. Because for women it's only about the feeling, not reality.

Funny thing is if you disregard his faggy hair, style and physical weakness, the skull of that second guy is pretty robust. Strong mandible, masculine eye area, wide cheekbones. If you give him a buzzcut, a wider neck and put 40lbs of muscle on his frame, you'll get a totally different picture.

The problem is that modern women prefer prettiness over masculinity, which causes men to become more feminine and thus slowly collapses our traditional value system

Buddy, it's evolutionists themselves who defined the value of genetics by their role in aiding the survivability of the organism, I didn't define sh*t myself. Also I understand that being masculine doesn't mean anything to women, if anything they'd rather f*** each others than most masculine men because women are freaks of nature anyway. But my entire argument was revolved around checking the claim of whether sexual selection is dependent on having the genes that aid survivability to be actually valid or not

Also the second guy is 5'10 and the first guy's is 6'8 and it still won't make difference to most women since "feeling protected" is all just a horseshit argument women tell themselves to justify emotionally abusing short men due to their natural psychopathic tendencies

Also the second guy has a good jaw, but it's nothing special and the jaw of the first guy mogs his to oblivion. I unironically have a wider jaw than the second guy and it doesn't mean sh*t, I'm still a 3/10 in looks. Either way he's still weak as f*** and his slightly above average jaw isn't enough to compensate for the fact that he would get annihilated in most fights

 

[Diffused_confidence]

No, they're not, this is just bullshit pseudoscience. And I will prove it right now

Take this guy for instance:-

View attachment 178895


- 6'8
- Strong as f***
- Ultra-masculine Jaw
- Clear skin
- Fullhead of hair in his 40's
- Would kill 95% of men with his bare hands
- Martial arts expert

According to evolutionary psychology, this guy should be good looking as f*** considering his genes. And women should all be soaking wet for him. Yet 99% of his fans are men and women don't give a single f*** about him

Then we have this guy:-

View attachment 178896

- Looks indistinguishable from a female except for his jaw
- The average man would snap him in half
- Twink frame
- Feminine body language
- Wouldn't last a minute in a war or a real fight
- Attention whoring mentally weak pussy

This guy should be unattractive as f*** due to all those extremely unmasculine traits. Yet 99% of his fans are prime girls thirsting for him and would spread their legs for him on command unlike the first guy who most likely would have to resort to rape to get pussy if there were no laws

It's all just bullshit lottery about how your genes manifest whether they're good or bad. Also ugly parents can have good looking children in many cases and I can attest to that personally as most of the Chad I know have mediocre looking parents. My parents were average looking when they were young and I look like sh*t, so it doesn't really mean anything

You could literally be born with superhuman strength, a flawless immune system and an extremely masculine personality and no woman would give a sh*t about you if you're ugly or bald. But you could be a weak twink who's a massive pussy and catches cold from exposing his arms to some wind and you could have the healthiest prime females interested in you because you look aesthetically pleasing or have good hair

Women are absolutely f*****g retarded and the whole argument on good genes stemming from some dogshit pseudoscientific evolutionary psychology is just an excuse by atheist cuckolds and feminists to give a pass to women to wh*** as much as they please. Women shouldn't be allowed to make a choice when it comes to most things because they lead to the degeneration of humanity due to their retardation and poor choices. Ideally they shouldn't leave their houses and roam in society except under specific circumstances.

You undervalue the importance of face. This guy doesn't have the right facial phenotype and proportions. Also past age like 21 women start going for the first guy due to height.

 

[Caillou]

You undervalue the importance of face. This guy doesn't have the right facial phenotype and proportions. Also past age like 21 women start going for the first guy due to height.

I'm not undervaluing sh*t, I literally said the second guy is more attractive due to his looks. My point was that having good or bad genes isn't everything when it comes to your sexual attractiveness. It matters to some extent of course, but you could have good genes and be unattractive and have bad genes and be attractive

Also no woman of any age is going to choose the first guy over the second guy unless they're over 35, and no one wants those old hags anyway

 

[Diffused_confidence]

I'm not undervaluing sh*t, I literally said the second guy is more attractive due to his looks. My point was that having good or bad genes isn't everything when it comes to your sexual attractiveness. It matters to some extent of course, but you could have good genes and be unattractive and have bad genes and be attractive

Also no woman of any age is going to choose the first guy over the second guy unless they're over 35, and no one wants those old hags anyway

But face is also genetics. And it's the most important genetics.

 

[Caillou]

But face is also genetics. And it's the most important genetics.

Everything is genetic but you could have good genetics and a bad face or vice versa

 

[vondoom]

nice to see everyone acts here like they got oh so many choices^^

 

[Oknow]

It's come to my attention that @Oknow is giving f*****g bluepill bullshit advice for online dating.

I will give the real advice that works for online dating

1. Have good genetics.

The end.

Seriously. I've said this for the longest time. People are animals and animals follow the laws of natural selection. The female species is the selector of natural selection and will always choose the best mate for better offspring.

When women see a man who is under 6ft tall she is going to think of her potential children (sons in particular) being short. And because she as a woman knows how female nature is, she is going to try to prevent the risk of having a son like that by mating with a man who is 6 ft tall. Same argument applies to balding, race, and face.

A man needs to have a solid genetic foundation to have success in dating, let alone online dating. Here are what I consider the requirements.

1. You must be at least 5'10 but those in the 5'10 to 5'11 range must be way above average in other departments. Otherwise it's 6 ft tall. Any man at 5'9 or lower is subhuman and under a female dictatorship would be sent to the gas chambers or shot by firing squad, as female nature comes down to eugenics.
2. You must have a Norwood 2 at worst. A man at Norwood 2 better also have other good qualities or they are sent to the gas chambers as well.

3. You need good facial ratios. Women know within a millisecond if a man is ugly facially. Our brain has a section with 1 job. Scan a face. If she scans your face and the output is subhuman, then she would view you as a creep and hope you die. With influence she could have you sent to the gas chambers.

These 3 are major for online dating as its all about looks.

Outside online and for maintaining a relationship, yes your personality and money matters but you have other genetic factors in play.

4. IQ. Women want their kids to have financial success and that heavily correlates with iq.

5. Penis size. Women want at least 7 inches min and 6 inch girth min. Women want to feel full when being penetrated and if you have a small dick then it's over.

So that's it. If you are missing one of these things, go rope / ldar.

i only have the height and NW2, and pull

I’m ugly

 

[Znx]

1. before 30: dont be ugly, preferably be handsome
2. after 30: dont be ugly, dont be unemployed, preferably have a good career
3. social exposure, at least a minimum of that famous killer instinct (willing to go for it, maybe even risk a rejection).


numero 3 is especially important for guys who fall into the normal looking category

Portuguese?