- Reaction score
- 3,659
I dont know what you guys are talking about with PGD2. I have not seen a single study showing results from any pgd2 antagonist. Not any existing drug trials or a result of any kind showing or proving that pgd2 antagonists have any results for hair. A paper suggesting PGD 2 is implicated in male pattern baldness or elevated, and then showing that causes male pattern baldness directly are two different things. I have not seen proof.
When I see those studies, and the drug is available from a reliable source then we talk. Until that happens finasteride is king of the jungle. Link to me the 5 year double blind trial showing that pgd2 antagonist stops male pattern baldness?
You don't even take Finasteride and you've been here for THIRTEEN YEARS. Your hair loss is so slow you don't even take medication yet you have 3000 posts on a hair loss forum. I'm sure you have all the time in the world waiting for "studies" and "proof".
Meanwhile, there are guys here who are 19 and diffusing into a NW5 who will take everything and anything that they can tolerate, and they get side effects from Finasteride - which for some of us grew more tits than hair, so f*** your "King of the jungle" - with all its scientific studies to back it up, when it's worthless for people like me and the other youngins who really have it BAD. I've had more success so far with things that don't have a single study to back it up than what I've had with Finasteride, and I don't have time to sit on my *** and wait until the almighty scientific community deems baldness worthy of adequate research.