Replicel Is On Fire Lately — Data In Feb.

iamgotham

iamgotham

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
99
Hey @paxis I was about to say the same.

I don't know why they even release any "expected dates" for anything...

So, we will probably have access to this new data in late March / early April.
 
R

Royaume

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
867
omg... wasnsure that they release the data today... WTF is this? a fkcing conspiracy theory against male pattern baldness? who the fkck sits behind this. delays after delays after fkcing delays
 
K

kawnshawn

Established Member
Reaction score
413
If there was a leak and if their stock was falling because of said leak then you can bet damn well someone would of found out and posted to one of the forums or blogs. It is disappointing though to have replicel tease and say data is imminent for February and not release any. God knows people on here have been teased enough about new treatments.
 
S

Stupidon

Established Member
Reaction score
184
Interesting slides from the last company's update:

PHASE 2 CLINICAL STUDY - Primary Endpoint: Hair density

Japan (ongoing)
2018: Data expected
2018: Potential market launch Costs covered by Shiseido Data shared

Germany (pending)
Dosing & treatment frequency trial - Clinical trial application to be filed by year-end

---
In the following days:
Final analysis of 5-year safety data as well as 12 and 24-month post-injection efficacy data from the original phase 1 trial of RCH-01 for which 6-month interim analysis of safety and efficacy was published in 2012.
 
Captain Rex

Captain Rex

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
540
N

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
kawnshawn said:
If there was a leak and if their stock was falling because of said leak then you can bet damn well someone would of found out and posted to one of the forums or blogs.
Click to expand...

They can get into trouble for leaks. If they post leaks in a forum or blog then there would be a way to trace those leaks back to them.

More likely they would just tell people important to themselves - family and friends - so family/friends could sell their stock. And then the stock would drop because of the sell-off.
 
Last edited:
T

thomps1523

Established Member
Reaction score
298
nameless said:
I wonder if there is a leak of information at the 3rd party level. That could explain the recent stock price drop.
Click to expand...
nameless said:
You need to grow a brain, moron.

Like I said, lots of stock-holders must be calling Replicel with concerns that there could be leaks or else Replicel wouldn't have posted their tweet that Replicel hasn't done any leaking. It looks like lots of people are seeing the same thing I'm seeing. LMAO! You need to go back to school.
Click to expand...

I tweeted them about it, and I read 2 others asking the same... they're usually decent about responding/addressing tweets. Didn't have to be stockholders.
 
N

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
N

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
macaroni said:
i work in a big company and have to deal with information releases/PR all the time. I think what is going on is they know the results, and the results are not lining up with what they expected. Therefore they are either purposefully delaying announcing that data to closer to the end of quarter so the value of the stock doesn't plummet drastically in the one month left in the quarter (giving it less time to adjust before they close out the quarter to make financials look a bit better). Or they are having another company evaluate the data as a second opinion in an attempt to rule out the outliers in the study so that data looks more favorable than it is. I can think of no reason where the results are spectacular and they delay announcing it to the public. Clearly they had intentions of scheduling a press release (which they did today), so that release still went out but just talked about the partnerships instead of the data that was pending. They cleverly wrapped the bad news in with the "positive" partnerships to downplay the negative aspects (a standard PR strategy).

The only alternate scenario is Shiseido is somehow giving them sh*t for releasing their data at this stage and is holding them back; still, even in that scenario it would likely mean the data is not so good and Shiseido doesn't want their investment to go to sh*t because Replicel's data isn't what was expected.

As far as their tweet, let's be real guys. Replicel's CEO is almost definitely, without a doubt, reading these forum threads. I would bet my left testicle on it. That is why he makes the videos he did very recently addressing the customer base, and that is why he is tweeting about the lack of data.
Click to expand...

I didn't want to be the one to say it so I'm glad you did. I also think they're intentionally stalling the release of info because the results aren't to their liking. I'm also thinking that they're having yet another company go over the results with the hope that the new company will find better results. I know you yourself suggested this and I wanted to let you know that I've been thinking the same thing so I agree with you. And I think that they're concerned that if they release the (bad) results it could demoralize the Shiseido effort.
 
Last edited:
Dench57

Dench57

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,428
Last edited:
hanginginthewire

hanginginthewire

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,428
I think the data will be good. This isn't based on anything, but hey after brotzu I'm not having this taken away from me until we know something concrete. :)

It was only a few days ago that they tweeted excitedly about upcoming results. And the stock was probably already falling. It could just be that the third party is delayed just like they claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: br1
J

jetlife1

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
117
macaroni said:
I think what is going on is they know the results, and the results are not lining up with what they expected. Therefore they are either purposefully delaying announcing that data
Click to expand...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the data wasn't lining up with what they expected then they would have already known this for a couple years considering it is data from a 5 year time frame. Therefore, I highly doubt it is a last second delay due to a sudden realization that the data isn't good. Furthermore, they wouldn't have advertised there being 5 year data in the first place if it wasn't good.

Can everyone please stop speculating and just wait for the data to come out? THANKS FELLAS (*cough* @nameless *cough*) ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2023 XenForo Ltd.
Top