Rooney Young (this 7 Word Title sh*t Is Ridiculous)
- Thread starter Rudiger
- Start date
resu
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 1,349
I feel like I'm missing out on the joke or this is some unseen levels of self-pity.
- Reaction score
- 915
I haven't approached a woman in god knows how long. Why would that be hard to believe.
And no, no self pity.
- Reaction score
- 6,428
i would watch out for h.l, he has been stalking Fred across these boards for too long cocohot and I for one am sick of it
- Reaction score
- 6,504
I'm an animal, I admit.
Cocohot should watch out for me, which he often does, and my stalking tactics.
You're being sarcastic but that did happen dench. It went on for about 18 months. He's come back acting like it never happened and he's normal but that isn't normal behaviour so I am going to be wary no matter what anyone says.
- Reaction score
- 6,504
It was pretty hard to avoid Fred's posts for a long time, as he posted with such volume and every opinion was so imposing, I never had to seek anything out. I don't know what I'm doing in particular "pretending like nothing happened" because I've noted a few times that I've had major problems with Fred in the past, and now I don't really care.
I wrote at the time, and still mean this, that it became annoying how much I replied to Fred, that I intentionally tried to avoid doing so, and whenever he posted something else mental my honest reaction was "Aw f***, not this again" but it was all so ridiculous that I felt compelled to have to say something. I did the opposite of seek it out, even at the worst of times, I really hated the fact I had to keep at him but everyone else seemed passive to these mental opinions (which by the way, are polar opposites to what he's saying now, only a year later).
I don't want to have problems with you but you seem to enjoy niggling at me, and the irony that you insist I'm the stalker. If you are wary of me and think I'm such a danger then stop making comments towards me, simple as that. When we had arguments back in the day, I once came on here to see that you had replied to me in 4 different threads, FOUR, nothing was directed at you, you just went off in a spat of insanity. I think this "stalking" thing is psychological projection, I posted a thread irrelevant to hair loss the other day, as many people do, and you reply within minutes with your little whiny complaint. I know that as long as I post on here, you're always going to be the freak around the corner, accusing me of sh*t when I don't even care anymore.
So we had that comment in the thread I made, and now "You're a strange guy h.l." I mean why did you feel the need to post this completely irrelevant opinion? Are you just desperate to talk about me? Dench mentions me and you're jumping at the opportunity to give your broader opinion, and nobody gives a sh*t what you think generally never mind about me.
Anyway what are you actually wary of? What am I going to do to you? What a f*****g pussy.
Maybe I should indulge in my apparent stalkerdom and PM you every day with just "BOO!" to f*** with you, because you're so frightened of whatever the f*** it is I apparently do.
Last edited:
blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
Balls of iron, you have.
blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
No homo here, please.
- Reaction score
- 6,988
- Reaction score
- 6,988
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 8,866
he made rebranding
blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
That was actually well said. Congrats.Yes, I too, find this 'stalker' appellation a little strange. Fred the Belgian's a nutcase. Everyone with half an ounce of sense on this board is aware of this. He's not an idiot, but he's also not a third as omniscient, all-knowing or just generally as infallible as he believes he is. And he veers between opinions which are the polar opposites of each other with a frequency that is quite frankly alarming. He doesn't seem to be able to speak in half measures - in Fred's world something is either absolutely right or absolutely wrong; it's dogma or nothing. Whenever his (often, but not always) ridiculous opinions (which he, of course, proclaims as 'facts') are challenged, he them either ignores all the evidence against him, distorts it or recourses to his usual puff party-piece: the infamous 'ad hominem' defence. Eventually, the evidence against Fred's bullshit will rise to a level where it is simply not feasible for him to keep on dismissing it and he will then swing, violently and nonsensically, a full 180 degrees from his original position. His attitude to 'gymcelling' is a textbook example of this. He's a pretty laughable figure and H.I. has every right to smack him down once in a while. That said, he's also a character and a makes a valuable contribution to this board as a social and (very pseudo!) scientific community. There are bits of him I like and a lot of him I don't. But yeah, a lot of the stuff he comes out with is M.E.N.T.A.L.
#top5mostmentalhltpostersofalltimeeasy #hehadpeopleloggingonjusttotellhimhewasapyschoffs #thatshouldtellyousomethingabouttheguys"insights"
P.S. And just lol at Fred's claims that he is "hyper-sensitive" - anything to distinguish yourself, eh Fred?
blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
I was being honest. You made a smart post.
I only said "actually" because I am quite drunk down here and I didn't think I would totally understand your post as I first started reading.
- Reaction score
- 6,428
Lol this was literally Tellersquill's MO
Baldhurts is just a spaz
He seems very nice in his videos though so I hope he gets better
- Reaction score
- 6,504
Yes, I too, find this 'stalker' appellation a little strange. Fred the Belgian's a nutcase. Everyone with half an ounce of sense on this board is aware of this. He's not an idiot, but he's also not a third as omniscient, all-knowing or just generally as infallible as he believes he is. And he veers between opinions which are the polar opposites of each other with a frequency that is quite frankly alarming. He doesn't seem to be able to speak in half measures - in Fred's world something is either absolutely right or absolutely wrong; it's dogma or nothing. Whenever his (often, but not always) ridiculous opinions (which he, of course, proclaims as 'facts') are challenged, he them either ignores all the evidence against him, distorts it or recourses to his usual puff party-piece: the infamous 'ad hominem' defence. Eventually, the evidence against Fred's bullshit will rise to a level where it is simply not feasible for him to keep on dismissing it and he will then swing, violently and nonsensically, a full 180 degrees from his original position. His attitude to 'gymcelling' is a textbook example of this. He's a pretty laughable figure and H.I. has every right to smack him down once in a while. That said, he's also a character and a makes a valuable contribution to this board as a social and (very pseudo!) scientific community. There are bits of him I like and a lot of him I don't. But yeah, a lot of the stuff he comes out with is M.E.N.T.A.L.
#top5mostmentalhltpostersofalltimeeasy #hehadpeopleloggingonjusttotellhimhewasapyschoffs #thatshouldtellyousomethingabouttheguys"insights"
P.S. And just lol at Fred's claims that he is "hyper-sensitive" - anything to distinguish yourself, eh Fred?
Well like I said, I don't really care anymore, but I'm also not desperately going out of my way to prove I've changed or anything, so I have no problem admitting your evaluation is spot on.
And parts of it reminds me of cocohot actually, we had a debate recently about how he is this mastermind in retorting to bald comments and it's "easy". The rest of us must be idiots for getting hurt by them huh?
Well I called him out on this, how often has he actually done this, and what exactly did he say? Of course the results were disappointing, not often at all, and wouldn't give an example of what he says.
More importantly, he didn't just leave it because he was wrong, he definitely wouldnt admit to being wrong, instead he twists the whole thing into how I'm a stalker and he can't give an example as I'll stalk him and twist his words. What kind of bullshit is that? It was such an obvious escape route, and despite him being a complete pituitary retard, I felt I remained calm and acted more decently than he deserved, and now will I continue that? f*** no.
But much like Fred, he diverted from the situation with a character assassination, and one that he's keeping up with.
Apparently it's not good enough that I'm no longer "stalking" Fred, he has to remind me of that period, bring up the topic of Fred to me, because he's a f*****g sh*t stirrer. How does that make any sense at all?
It's a good thing a stalker like me has someone like cocohot keeping me under constant surveillance, ensuring I'm not being naughty. Maybe he keeps a f*****g log of what I'm up to, making sure I'm not a danger to others.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 8,866
the more he sits on HairLossTalk.com/lookism the harder for him will be to come back on "dating scene"
- Reaction score
- 6,988
lol
this sh*t really is nonsense bh
i mean i feel for you. your obviously not trolling. i can see your a bit fucked up.
but this is cureable. you have model looks. even nw7 you would still do fine considering your closing in on 30.
you really are wasting time on here. you need to see a therapist. get all that sh*t from your past our your system and just move on.
if i had your jawline, i wouldnt be here.