- Reaction score
- 8,249
Sheesh It Never Ends - Always The Butt Of Jokes
- Thread starter Marky
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 2,776
Not a fan of me ? But why ? I'm not a cuck.
- Reaction score
- 2,776
But you gotta admit. Cucks and white knights are f*****g annoying and are disgrace. Even women hate them. They would sellout their whole family for a pussy.
- Reaction score
- 2,776
Red-pillers aren't necessarily losers or misogynists. They're just more aware of the truth, but of course, some of them may sound extreme.
- Reaction score
- 8,249
- Reaction score
- 5,714
pics or it didn't happen.
- Reaction score
- 8,249
Sorry but my old lady ears could not actually hear your posting.
- Reaction score
- 8,249
I hold a master's degree in political communication.
Not bragging (people laugh at communication studies all the time so), but that might explain why you're struggling a little here.
And if you think that doesn't mean sh*t, well, I hope that at least you can see that my arguments can hold some water.
You're 17 and you barely know much about anything, and you expect to come here and to be perfectly right about any subject?
That's what you say: you know everything, and anyone who successfully dismantles your arguments is an oppressive bully who is trying to play mind games and call other bullies to form a mob so they can unfairly mistreat you for their own enjoyment.
You're going to have to do better than that: first realize that you're fairly young and accept that you still have a lot to learn. Second, engage with arguments and avoid ad hominems, and avoid telling people that they're ignorant every other sentence, or very ignorant ( @hairblues ), as if that had any value whatsoever and wasn't actually bringing you down.
I like your passion, and you write amazingly well in English for a 17 year old living under an authoritarian regime, and you could do great things if you channeled your energy properly and let go of the things that are holding you back.
Like Islam.
Wow that actually hurt my feelings
- Reaction score
- 8,249
This is just weird
Sorry thought you randomly called me ignorant out of blue for no reason.
- Reaction score
- 2,776
Yeah, i'll admit that you're way better than me when it comes to politics, but i rarely even debate about politics. I debate about facts, history and logic. And that doesn't require masters degree, it requires intelligence and knowledge. As i said before, being lonely gave me a lot of time to study things like history and stuff and be a lot more mature than my age. 95% of people at my age won't understand any sh*t we're debating about because they're usually interested in things like girls or teen drama and you know, that's why i know what i'm saying, not just trying to win the argument with nonsense bullshit. Islam doesn't hold me back, the first word in the Quran, was "read". And we have hadith that says that scientists have the same status as the prophets of god, and that's a great honor.I hold a master's degree in political communication.
Not bragging (people laugh at communication studies all the time so), but that might explain why you're struggling a little here.
And if you think that doesn't mean sh*t, well, I hope that at least you can see that my arguments can hold some water.
You're 17 and you barely know much about anything, and you expect to come here and to be perfectly right about any subject?
That's what you say: you know everything, and anyone who successfully dismantles your arguments is an oppressive bully who is trying to play mind games and call other bullies to form a mob so they can unfairly mistreat you for their own enjoyment.
You're going to have to do better than that: first realize that you're fairly young and accept that you still have a lot to learn. Second, engage with arguments and avoid ad hominems, and avoid telling people that they're ignorant every other sentence, or very ignorant ( @hairblues ), as if that had any value whatsoever and wasn't actually bringing you down.
I like your passion, and you write amazingly well in English for a 17 year old living under an authoritarian regime, and you could do great things if you channeled your energy properly and let go of the things that are holding you back.
Like Islam.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 193
Lol
They had a legal protest to not remove markers
The antics had bats and mace
One but but drove into a crowd
His background is actually liberal
Hate.?
They had a legal protest to not remove markers
The antics had bats and mace
One but but drove into a crowd
His background is actually liberal
- Reaction score
- 466
Inequality is a hallmark of democracy. It means we are free to create our own future, and hence, you see differences. We have an equality of opportunity to do as we please. If we don't have that freedom, you have equality of outcomes. It astounds me, that someone might read that, and think "oh, we're all equal? That sounds good!". Under a dictatorship, we are all equally poor and heavily restricted. Oh, then there's the millions of murders carried out by the state against its people. Communism killed far more people than the Nazis. Luckily, we don't need to subscribe to either philosophy. It's not a false dichotomy like we're often told it is.
- Reaction score
- 466
I'm glad some people can see through all of the propaganda. Antifa don't need permits, and the police are often told to stand down whenever they're around. Even when they're not rioting, they turn up to intimidate (fully masked, carry weapons, body language suggests violence is about to explode).
- Reaction score
- 466
It's a shifting of the overton window. Now neo-nazis are just called nazis, or even Nazis. This appears to be the "new normal" (when it wasn't up until a month ago or so, https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=nazi). Neo-nazi is a more accurate term that makes a distinction between what was a one-off group of people in a historical place and time...and contemporary white supremacists. If you don't make a distinction, then ... well, it's just like calling anyone who's a NW3 "fully bald". Sure, you can do that, but there's a Norwood scale between a fullhead and fully bald we can use. It's actually quite useful because it allows us to more accurately measure how bald someone is. Calling someone a nazi (aligning them to one of the worst atrocities carried out by man) - sure, you get to do that. You can essentially call them murderers. Have at it. But you blunten language in the process, and you actually fall into the same hyperbolic trap that idiots like Alex Jones does.
- Reaction score
- 466
BLM/Antifa reek of low self-esteem. They are typical Marxist movements that cannot stand to see natural inequality amongst populations. Every answer they have is "because discrimination". They refuse to take responsibility for their actions. If truth was on their side, they would not resort to violence. They want state support for everything. They cannot stand freedom of speech when they don't agree with it, and will resort to violence to shut it down. They are completely anti-democratic and utterly authoritarian. To me, that just suggests low confidence and a feeling of not being abled to make a life of their own without massive government assistance.
Last edited:
CaptainForehead
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 4,302
- Reaction score
- 8,866
- Reaction score
- 466
I love the irony of "all white people are racist".
- Reaction score
- 466
Interesting to see that the Boston Free Speech rally was auto-labelled as a "nazi" rally. This is what happens when we escalate language and call anyone who disagrees with us "nazis". Just look at those awful "nazis":-
Of course, the media were careful not to show any photos of the Free Speech rally protestors (of which there were a tiny handful). No, all you saw was the outside - the "counter-protestors" :-
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...premacist-counter-demonstrators-a7902816.html
(note the words in the URL, white supremacists, nazis etc).
Black Lives DO Matter, no to GMOs....NOPE, nothing about gassing jews or white supremacy.
And if the journalists were doing their job, they would have....you know....found out what the protestors were protesting about. There was only a handful of them.
NOPE.....if they fact checked, it wouldn't have fit their preplanned narrative of the event. If they wanted this to be a nazi rally, then let it be so. Even if it wasn't. Where was the interview with one of the rally speakers, Dr Shiva Ayyadurai? I mean, he would be quite a key person to get well-rounded view of events - to get the other side? No can do - that would spoil the narrative.
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/898956356870328320
Want to find news about what the Free Speech protestors actually protested ABOUT? Let's try Google:-
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&q=boston+free+speech+rally
NOPE. You won't ever know. You won't find a photo from the mainstream media of the actual Free Speech rally protestors. All you get is news about the counter-protestors calling the Free Really protestors nazis and white supremacists. Absolutely fake news.
I did say earlier that you guys were played so badly by using the word "nazi". That was a word used by the media. Don't fall into that trap. This is the "Alex Jonesification" of ordinary people - get them riled up and using ridiculously hyperbolic language. Most people will think that the Boston Free Speech rally was some kind of nazi rally. Instead, it was a peaceful rally about....yes, black lives do matter, GMOs & health...is this the new "nazism"?
FAKE NEWS.
Of course, the media were careful not to show any photos of the Free Speech rally protestors (of which there were a tiny handful). No, all you saw was the outside - the "counter-protestors" :-
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...premacist-counter-demonstrators-a7902816.html
(note the words in the URL, white supremacists, nazis etc).
Black Lives DO Matter, no to GMOs....NOPE, nothing about gassing jews or white supremacy.
And if the journalists were doing their job, they would have....you know....found out what the protestors were protesting about. There was only a handful of them.
NOPE.....if they fact checked, it wouldn't have fit their preplanned narrative of the event. If they wanted this to be a nazi rally, then let it be so. Even if it wasn't. Where was the interview with one of the rally speakers, Dr Shiva Ayyadurai? I mean, he would be quite a key person to get well-rounded view of events - to get the other side? No can do - that would spoil the narrative.
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/898956356870328320
Want to find news about what the Free Speech protestors actually protested ABOUT? Let's try Google:-
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&q=boston+free+speech+rally
NOPE. You won't ever know. You won't find a photo from the mainstream media of the actual Free Speech rally protestors. All you get is news about the counter-protestors calling the Free Really protestors nazis and white supremacists. Absolutely fake news.
I did say earlier that you guys were played so badly by using the word "nazi". That was a word used by the media. Don't fall into that trap. This is the "Alex Jonesification" of ordinary people - get them riled up and using ridiculously hyperbolic language. Most people will think that the Boston Free Speech rally was some kind of nazi rally. Instead, it was a peaceful rally about....yes, black lives do matter, GMOs & health...is this the new "nazism"?
FAKE NEWS.
Last edited: