So I Went On A Date With A Girl Last Weekend...

[Exodus2011]

\

The word 'thick' describing women came from urban community...that is not what a 'thick' girl is a thick girl is more weight on her bones .Not fat but also not a fit skinny size 2 with an altered ***.

That girl is fit and slim with butt implants---(which no beef thats fine)

but not a 'thick' girl..Thick girl is like Beyonce its thick thighs, a 'fat' ***..

just say black people lol, we know what you are talking about.

what are we supposed to call it?

yes . . . the steatopygia is quite compelling

 

[hairblues]

just say black people lol, we know what you are talking about.

what are we supposed to call it?

yes . . . the steatopygia is quite compelling

Technically its not just black people when i refer to urban i am thinking Brooklyn Bronx Queens etc its black, its latino, Italian, jewish and Irish but Irish have no asses lol jk
'thick' as i always knew it meant like thick thighs, fat ***, wide hips--not fat but two cheeseburgers away from being fat.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Americans have a lot of euphemisms for black.

A friend of mine who moved there from India had no idea what "inner city" meant for two years. When he figured out it was code for black he suddenly understood it all.

 

[hairblues]

When I say thick I'm not talking fat with cellulite. I'm saying thin frame with thick features.

a girl with thick thighs a fat *** and a big waitst is not thick, she's fat. Depending on how horny I am though I could deal with a little extra coach on a girl as long as she wears it well

I always thought this was what was considered thick
Like Beyonce, J Lo, Thiker thighs, hip and ***..not 'fat'. Just meaty.

 

[blackg]

Speaking of petite women, my favourite female on the planet..

View attachment 44389

Is that Anna Kendrick? I would bang her ***!

 

[dm900]

Wow this thread went off the rails. Don't mean to back track but

 

[dm900]

Height is extremely impotyant. If you say otherwise, you're fooling yourself.

 

[dm900]

Facial aesthetics are number one, but stature is second and you cant have one without the other. A tiny handsome nw0 is going to look stupid next to an average looking 6 foot + Norwood 2. Ideally 0 hairloss is optimal but it will not close the gap between you and a larger man with slight hairloss.

 

[tellersquill]

I think the problem with wanting unrealistically beautiful women is that women may start to want unrealistically attractive men.

I think p**rn has ruined some of us - people freak out over stretchmarks and cellulite. I'll tell the younger guys here, right now:

90% of women over thirty have stretch marks and a touch of cellulite (and yes, most slim women have it to). Its normal and shouldn't be insulted.

 

[CopeForLife]

I think the problem with wanting unrealistically beautiful women is that women may start to want unrealistically attractive men.

I think p*rn has ruined some of us - people freak out over stretchmarks and cellulite. I'll tell the younger guys here, right now:

90% of women over thirty have stretch marks and a touch of cellulite (and yes, most slim women have it to). Its normal and shouldn't be insulted.

I have stretch marks from age of 15 and I am male. Never been fat. Where is your god now?

 

[tellersquill]

That's my point - most people have stretch marks - we shouldn't judge people so harshly.

Yep, Dante, you are right in some way. Also, older women tend to look for security and someone they actually like spending time with.

When you are 21 all you care about is being hot and being with someone else who is hot. Its a very shallow time and thank god those vain times end.

I'm decent looking and I never get matched with 21 year olds on tinder. I always get women between 25-35, which is sometimes a shame as 21 year old women are good looking.

 

[dunno]

And you're decent-looking! Imagine if you were ugly, just like me, or copeforlife or exodus! Your chances would be nonexistent, just like mine.

But no, I'm a pussy, I can improve (quote shookwun).

Are you saying copeforlife and exodus are ugly? that's not very nice of you.

 

[horunger]

Y

Didn't you read my post?

If my money is used to pay for these fat fucks' gastric bypasses, it is my own f*****g business!

That's how it works in Belgium and most of Europe anyway. I know Americans don't pay much taxes.

your money,like youre rich and carrying the whole burden alone, thats sickening. Youre a bitter bully, worry more about that and less about others.

Seriously, anyone with real money wouldnt mind, fred is probably on disablement pension and thus have time to kill on forums. Most gastrosurgery patients in belgium pay more taxes i bet. Plain bully and surely too coward to tell it to fat ppls faces, brave only behind a keyboard. Im not fat but i stand up to bullies trying to ease their misery by attacking others in an unfortunate position. What a shame, so repulsive.

 

[horunger]

This pecking order is dusgusting, eyeglass users picking on oneeyed, oneeyed picking on the blind, how deep can you sink? Being bald isnt better if you look down on others like "well at least im not fat". This is just sad.

 

[tellersquill]

Fat people can lose weight. Telling them that might actually help them lose weight.

Saying "at least I'm not bald" cuts deep since you can't anything about it.

Get another hair transplant?

Just an FYI to everyone in general - some people are okay with being over-weight.

I know a fair few fat people and most of them would rather be slimmer but they aren't willing to give up tasty things - so they end up accepting being overweight.

I think they are well within their rights to do that.

 

[blackg]

I know a fair few fat people and most of them would rather be slimmer but they aren't willing to give up tasty things - so they end up accepting being overweight.

I think they are well within their rights to do that.

So do I. Noone should be allowed to dictate the social landscape.
Especially by shaming.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Not all fat people can lose weight easily.

Many have hormonal problems. These can be intrinsic hormonal problems, or they can be exogeneous. If your doctor puts you on insulin or prednisone, you're guaranteed to put on body fat even if you cut calories and do more exercise, that's been proven.

Further, a lot of the advice on losing weight -- do cardio and eat less -- is wrong. The strategy of "eat less, do more cardio" has a 93% failure rate so it doesn't work, but that's what people are told to do to lose weight. The effect is even worse when people follow low-fat diets that are also low in cholesterol, as recommended by most doctors.

This was shown in the 1940s Minnesota Starvation Experiments. If you just cut calories to 1600/day on a standard diet, metabolism crashes in most people, they feel like they're freezing, they're irritable, and they start hurting themselves, it doesn't work. They end up weighing more than when they started.

A 1980s study from Denmark took sedentary adults and trained them to run a marathon. You know how much weight they lost from cardio? The average among women in the study was 0 lbs (yes, 0 lbs), and the average among men was 5 lbs. Moderate intensity continuous cardio, e.g. jogging for 60-90 minutes, is simply not a good strategy for cutting fat. That's known from measurements. The body compensates by either decreasing metabolism, or increasing appetite.

 

[Exodus2011]

And you're decent-looking! Imagine if you were ugly, just like me, or copeforlife or exodus! Your chances would be nonexistent, just like mine.

But no, I'm a pussy, I can improve (quote shookwun).

http://www.troll.me/images/angry-samuel-l-jackson/what-the-f***-you-said-nigga.jpg

 

[tellersquill]

Not all fat people can lose weight easily.

Many have hormonal problems. These can be intrinsic hormonal problems, or they can be exogeneous. If your doctor puts you on insulin or prednisone, you're guaranteed to put on body fat even if you cut calories and do more exercise, that's been proven.

Further, a lot of the advice on losing weight -- do cardio and eat less -- is wrong. The strategy of "eat less, do more cardio" has a 93% failure rate so it doesn't work, but that's what people are told to do to lose weight. The effect is even worse when people follow low-fat diets that are also low in cholesterol, as recommended by most doctors.

This was shown in the 1940s Minnesota Starvation Experiments. If you just cut calories to 1600/day on a standard diet, metabolism crashes in most people, they feel like they're freezing, they're irritable, and they start hurting themselves, it doesn't work. They end up weighing more than when they started.

A 1980s study from Denmark took sedentary adults and trained them to run a marathon. You know how much weight they lost from cardio? The average among women in the study was 0 lbs (yes, 0 lbs), and the average among men was 5 lbs. Moderate intensity continuous cardio, e.g. jogging for 60-90 minutes, is simply not a good strategy for cutting fat. That's known from measurements. The body compensates by either decreasing metabolism, or increasing appetite.

I lost 2lbs per week eating 2000kcal per day and working out at least five times each week.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

I lost 2lbs per week eating 2000kcal per day and working out at least five times each week.

If your calories follow the traditional food pyramid, and if your workouts are moderate-intensity continuous cardio, the weight won't stay off unless you're in the genetically fortunate 7%.