- Reaction score
- 115
How can we know the correct dosage when this was bathed in an isolated hair follicle for a few days?
How can we know the correct dosage when this was bathed in an isolated hair follicle for a few days?
you re free to become a guinea pig yourself mate , otherwise no need for your attitudeSo rather than following the dosage in the study, you pulled a number out of your *** and slathered your head with it. Then when you got side effects that very well may be attributable (surprise!), you recommend everyone stop using it. You're retarded. Jesus.
The study dose was BETWEEN 1 TO 5 MG PER ML OF SOLUTION. I used 8 ML OF SOLUTION to cover my whole head, and yes I need more solution because I have long hair, and it’s not easy to spread less than 6-8ml over a time hole head with long hair. I opted to used between 4-5mg per ml. Can you do math? Apparently not.So rather than following the dosage in the study, you pulled a number out of your *** and slathered your head with it. Then when you got side effects that very well may be attributable (surprise!), you recommend everyone stop using it. You're retarded. Jesus.
We thought about that but WAY does not dissolve well in ethanol alone, which would make it very hard to put into liposomesI think the medium has always been a problem with WAY as DMSO will always make it go systemic. A targeted liposomal version would be the preferred method but even then it would be a shot in the dark.
I would still ditch the DMSO and just let it sit for much longer in the PG/ETH mix.We thought about that but WAY does not dissolve well in ethanol alone, which would make it very hard to put into liposomes
Sorry to insult your potential internet g/f, bro. What's actually not needed on this forum are people who recklessly "trial" new compounds w/o doing sh*t for research beforehand, then just weeks later tell everyone that they shouldn't try it b/c it's dangerous. She's hasn't stuck to one single, well thought out trial or regimen for anywhere near the generally accepted 6 month minimum timeline most compounds need. Reason being, "her body's different". Yeah, b/c feels > science.you re free to become a guinea pig yourself mate , otherwise no need for your attitude
Couple of others did that and there seemed to always still be a cloudy or grainy day precipitate.I would still ditch the DMSO and just let it sit for much longer in the PG/ETH mix.
You been documenting my life? Do you know this? Firstly, 90% of what I have tried has been used for a minimum of three months. Quite a few of these things fucked with my bloods or gavee sides, “Hmm this thing is giving me a rash and raising my dht. This thing is making me bleed and lose weight. This thing is f*****g with my liver. Better stick with it!”. Aside from which, the main issue is finding a minoxidil replacement because it is causing more issues than anything. If you know anything about female hairloss, which I am sure you do not, it’s pretty common for women to respond to nothing but minoxidil, so I don’t have any other sh*t to fall back on. This experiment was understaken with full knowledge of potential risks, and with the intention of seeing whether or not it is safe an effective before f*** tons of other peopl jumped on it. Lastly, my body, my choice. Is it your head? No. Don’t like it? Don’t comment on the thread. Bye.Sorry to insult your potential internet g/f, bro. What's actually not needed on this forum are people who recklessly "trial" new compounds w/o doing sh*t for research beforehand, then just weeks later tell everyone that they shouldn't try it b/c it's dangerous. She's hasn't stuck to one single, well thought out trial or regimen for anywhere near the generally accepted 6 month minimum timeline most compounds need. Reason being, "her body's different". Yeah, b/c feels > science.
how do you expect people to know the dosage on preclinical drugs ? if you got it all figured out go make your own trials on yourself , or i dont see the reasoning behind your attitudeSorry to insult your potential internet g/f, bro. What's actually not needed on this forum are people who recklessly "trial" new compounds w/o doing sh*t for research beforehand, then just weeks later tell everyone that they shouldn't try it b/c it's dangerous. She's hasn't stuck to one single, well thought out trial or regimen for anywhere near the generally accepted 6 month minimum timeline most compounds need. Reason being, "her body's different". Yeah, b/c feels > science.
Boo hoo. Not that I'd ever want to, but no I haven't; you've done a fine job of documenting your life all over this damn forum all by yourself.You been documenting my life? Do you know this? Firstly, 90% of what I have tried has been used for a minimum of three months. Quite a few of these things fucked with my bloods or gavee sides, “Hmm this thing is giving me a rash and raising my dht. This thing is making me bleed and lose weight. This thing is f*****g with my liver. Better stick with it!”. Aside from which, the main issue is finding a minoxidil replacement because it is causing more issues than anything. If you know anything about female hairloss, which I am sure you do not, it’s pretty common for women to respond to nothing but minoxidil, so I don’t have any other sh*t to fall back on. This experiment was understaken with full knowledge of potential risks, and with the intention of seeing whether or not it is safe an effective before f*** tons of other peopl jumped on it. Lastly, my body, my choice. Is it your head? No. Don’t like it? Don’t comment on the thread. Bye.
The study is posted on the very first page of this thread that people can READ THEMSELVES. When I do get my hands on WAY and come up w/ a thoughtful and responsible dosage, you'll be the last to know about it.how do you expect people to know the dosage on preclinical drugs ? if you got it all figured out go make your own trials on yourself , or i dont see the reasoning behind your attitude
yea when you do all that and also stop bashing on people to look cool and responsible i ll still not give a f*** about your responsible dosage trialThe study is posted on the very first page of this thread that people can READ THEMSELVES. When I do get my hands on WAY and come up w/ a thoughtful and responsible dosage, you'll be the last to know about it.
Boo hoo. Not that I'd ever want to, but no I haven't; you've done a fine job of documenting your life all over this damn forum all by yourself.
Wtf are you on about? The study dose was 2 μM concentration, not 1 - 5mg per ml. Which means you made your solution approx 10mM. That's FIVE THOUSAND times more than the study. Can you do math? Apparently not.
Damn. Huge burn. If that doesn't get you your first webcam chat w/ her I don't know what will.yea when you do all that and also stop bashing on people to look cool and responsible i ll still not give a f*** about your responsible dosage trial
Holy sh*t she took 5000x dosage?
sorry to disappoint you , i am just here to find solutions to hairloss , not girls around the globe . meanwhile her contribution is : find the news about way , organise a group buy , test it on herself , post progress .Damn. Huge burn. If that doesn't get you your first webcam chat w/ her I don't know what will.