Dude, dNovo was founded in 2018! Why do you think they are behind Stemson in the stage of their research, funding, company size etc? Because they are just lazy? It’s obvious they are facing their own problems, don’t be naive to fall for press releases marketing again
dNovo can never work in scarring alopecia. There will always be a need for something like Stemson.
You guys are enchanted by their fluffy press release. If their approach didn’t have its own problems they wouldn’t be moving so slowly in basically every main company metric.You fail to understand this is not about funding or start date at this stage. Other user tried to explain you but your in denial.
You guys are enchanted by their fluffy press release. If their approach didn’t have its own problems they wouldn’t be moving so slowly in basically every main company metric.
It’s 2022, f*ck mouse picsWell, at least we have a pretty decent mouse pic with human hair, seven months later, lol.
Yeah! Its time for pig pics with no cosmetic viable hair at allIt’s 2022, f*ck mouse pics
Well it also can't work in Androgenetic Alopecia if perifollicular fibrosis is so bad there isn't a functional follicle anymore. Then it's the same thing.Highly doubt thats their target market though. Im seeing through Androgenetic Alopecia glasses obviously
YesBy the way does finasteride prevent perifollicular fibrosis from occurring if you start taking it early enough?
Doesn't do any good if the hair follicle is already gone.Also are there any drugs on the horizon to reverse fibrosis?
The problem is dNovo is only reprogramming mesenchymal cells afaik. They can't generate a new hair follicle on their own. They also need epithelial cells. It's the interaction between the two that grows a hair shaft.The reprogramming approach was able to regenerate a crushed optic nerve in mice, so is it possible it can regenerate a hair follicle too?
f*ck that sh*t too, but it’s still better than mouse picsYeah! Its time for pig pics with no cosmetic viable hair at all
what is their method and is it better than Stemson?You pretty much know nothing about their mathod. You just know the results looks great.
The method is irrelevant, it's the mathod that matterswhat is their method and is it better than Stemson?
and the concept?The method is irrelevant, it's the mathod that matters
i dont think you are just a regular internet dude, I think you are a massive moron that pollutes this thread to death and has no genuine opinion, someone who follows reactionary news like a sheep and changes his opinion like his diapers. today you say stemson will succeed but only in 10 years, tomorrows you will proclaim that stemson has failed(lmao) and then it'll be something else. someone who acts as I they are a prime customer who personally deserves weekly updates from a privately held biotech company because his incel *** is going bald. someone who knows nothing about early stage biontech companies but thinks he is an expert on it, someone who just generally loves too radiate baseless unfounded negativity and loves to engage in endless nonsense speculations without any data at hand. and someone who single handedly is ruining this threadmy opinion is worth nothing, I'm just a regular internet dude
but if someone has been following the topic of hair cloning for years, in my opinion everything indicates that Stemson has problems, human trials were supposed to be in 2021, it's 2022 and Hamilton talks about several years of trying on pigs, imo he only makes a good face for a bad game , of course I would like them to succeed, but on the other hand their solution will cost a fortune, imo it is the same price as Tsuji, I hope that dnovo will do it cheaper and faster than Stemson, they do not use ipsc cells .. ...
none of us have a clue what stemson is doing and whether it will be successful, but you will probably admit that it is not going according to plan, because human trials were supposed to start in 2021, you are right i don't know anything about hair cloning, but you or anyone else on this forum knows as much as I do, which means nothing, your knowledge is based on what you read on the interneti dont think you are just a regular internet dude, I think you are a massive moron that pollutes this thread to death and has no genuine opinion, someone who follows reactionary news like a sheep and changes his opinion like his diapers. today you say stemson will succeed but only in 10 years, tomorrows you will proclaim that stemson has failed(lmao) and then it'll be something else. someone who acts as I they are a prime customer who personally deserves weekly updates from a privately held biotech company because his incel *** is going bald. someone who knows nothing about early stage biontech companies but thinks he is an expert on it, someone who just generally loves too radiate baseless unfounded negativity and loves to engage in endless nonsense speculations without any data at hand. and someone who single handedly is ruining this thread
none of us have a clue what stemson is doing and whether it will be successful, but you will probably admit that it is not going according to plan, because human trials were supposed to start in 2021, you are right i don't know anything about hair cloning, but you or anyone else on this forum knows as much as I do, which means nothing, your knowledge is based on what you read on the internet
some of this forum live their dreams - stemson in 5 years for 50k $: D nobody forbids it, remember the plane flying to dr Tsuji?
I'd rather be young again then I can wait for my hair 50 years: D longerOn the whole, there is too little investment in hair cloning. Couple of million here and there, but that's it. If Bezos would have wanted a full mane, we would go much, much faster.
Bezos is interested in becoming young again and has invested in that field. Bet we will see tangible results there before we see them in hair multiplication.