- Reaction score
- 6,504
Strap In ... And Hold On To Your Rage
- Thread starter Rudiger
- Start date
I could barely read two paragraphs. I found the article infuriating because of the pleasure that women derives from the worries of her balding friends. What a b**ch.
Or the one about "I love watching women losing THEIR hair".
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 540
somehow i came across this article few months ago and i felt so awful at that time
it does't make any sense at all
a worthless article written by a shrewd, mean b**ch who hasn't seen life from the other side.
i am eagerly waiting for these new treatments to come out and shut their mouths.
I AM GLAD THAT I FOUND THIS FORUM.
it does't make any sense at all
a worthless article written by a shrewd, mean b**ch who hasn't seen life from the other side.
i am eagerly waiting for these new treatments to come out and shut their mouths.
I AM GLAD THAT I FOUND THIS FORUM.
If she ever has kids, I wonder how she will feel if her own son goes bald and becomes miserable and sinks into deep depression because women find him disgusting to look at. Does she even realize the mental trauma this condition causes to many men? The lack of empathy in her is surprising. I hope she goes bald herself.
- Reaction score
- 2,634
I posted that article two years ago:
https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...-love-watching-men-worry-about-balding.90311/
Jessica Machado is nothing special herself:
https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...-love-watching-men-worry-about-balding.90311/
Jessica Machado is nothing special herself:
- Reaction score
- 540
After reading the article
after watching her photo
after watching her photo
On another note, seeing a nice detailed closeup of her wrinkly skin and the layers upon layers of fraud (makeup) gives me a certain level of satisfaction. This shrew is aging like milk.
Lol and here is an example of what I mean when I say people on here are ridiculous regarding looks.
I get that she pisses you off, but she looks completely normal for her age. Hardly aging like milk.
Anyway, it's just modern feminazi propoganda as usual.
She doesn't consider young men in this equation and claims that women deal with this kind of insecurity their entire lives. Know how you can get a mate if you're a female?
Just exist. You don't have to do anything; one day, mr.right will approach you and you will go out with him and one day he'll ask you to marry him, etc. The only requirement most men have is "don't be fat".
Women on the other hand have a list of requirements beyond an individuals control. You have to be taller than her, have a certain color of hair, have hair, bone structure, etc.
I know this reads like a typical impact forum dirtbag post, but women simply can't relate to what dating is like if you're a man. They do not realize how good they have it; being free to just wait for the best suitor to come along.
Nothing new here.
- Reaction score
- 3,149
There are certain women who, when they are talking about men, seem to believe that all men are good-looking, well-off and tall.
Ugly, undesirable men don't even enter their head. That's why they can so easily say "men have it easier". Because to them "men" means 6'4 good looking guys.
She's being "comforted" in seeing men "finally struggle". Which first off is sadistic, and secondly shows that she's of course only talking about guys who've never struggled, eg. good looking dudes, well off dudes.
Me? Nah I don't exist as anything but a "threat" to this lady.
"bone-able, uninterrupted dominance" just lol.
- Reaction score
- 4,504
I read the article and I think the main problem with it is that she assumes all men have the same level of "slight", "fastidious" balding when they reach their late 30s.
Little does she know that a lot of us (me included) had to face this sh^t since they were 16/17 and basically we never had the youth most women had.
Little does she know that a lot of us (me included) had to face this sh^t since they were 16/17 and basically we never had the youth most women had.
- Reaction score
- 4,504
Very well said.
However, this problem applies to many generalizations that journalists make regarding a gender. When they talk about "women", they mean women in their 20s and good looking.
It was the case some months ago when an Italian female opinion maker complained that men are not virile anymore and they're not able to be "domineering" as men should be.
Of course all her female followers agreed, whereas males underlined that probably when she said "men" she meant "men we fancy and cannot resist".
- Reaction score
- 4,504
Read Selvaggia Lucarelli's post and suffer
http://www.mangiatoridicervello.com/2015/07/29/la-lucarelli-insegna-cosi-sono-i-veri-uomini/
T
tellersquill
Guest
I used to work as a journalist and in her defence she has to say controversial things to sell articles.
If she had been all moderate and said that men losing their hair was the same as her worrying about her ageing face then the editor would probably turn it down. That's why these journalists write these aggressive articles. And people like reading them, too. They like to get angry in a weird way, they like to be shocked, and they want to rage at the page.
If she had been all moderate and said that men losing their hair was the same as her worrying about her ageing face then the editor would probably turn it down. That's why these journalists write these aggressive articles. And people like reading them, too. They like to get angry in a weird way, they like to be shocked, and they want to rage at the page.
T
tellersquill
Guest
But that serves a point. Journalism isn't about value - its about selling clicks and copies.
The more controversy the better.
I think some people make the mistake of thinking journalism ought to be some moral calling whereas in reality its about some people who can write - and do little else - who decide to make a living out of those skills.
- Reaction score
- 3,149
I never understand how the argument that "this is the way it is" can be used against the argument "this is the way it should be".
Just because journalism is mostly a bunch of clickbait sh*t written specifically to garner hits doesn't mean it has to be that way and it certainly doesn't mean it should be that way.
Giiizmo
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 148
This. From a cursive look at the article, it's just mindless drivel designed to make you read it. Men have always been self-conscious about their appearance in one way or the other, even if society would have you believe the contrary. Look no further than Louis XIV wearing four inch high heels for a rather baroque example, or even the so-called "macho" men from the 80s who reveled in the density of their chest hair and their dapper mustaches.
And for a brief explanation of why "angry" content is so effective in getting you to pay attention to it:
No. Just no.
Journalism, by definition is not a creative writing endeavor.
Their job is to write about facts and their failure to do so is what is destroying the world.
After the media sh*t show of 2016, I'm astounded that anyone would say journalism isn't supposed to be moral and non partisan.
You should feel bad
T
tellersquill
Guest
It almost does.
Think about it from my perspective when I was freelance - if I offered a piece that was balanced and objective then it would seldom sell. If I wrote a piece claiming one side was a monster and the other a saint than the paper would buy it. By this nature of the business I was forced to sell crappy articles in order to earn my crust.
Its very cynical and that's why I left ( I wasn't a great journo anyway)
T
tellersquill
Guest
Ah, I just wrote in another post that this was why I quit.
Although I mostly earned my money from local reporting and travel write ups.
I think the worst thing I ever did was make out that some travel destinations were mini utopias