The Oral Seti Results Update Thread

SamFT

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
432
1) Here's a post here on HairLossTalk.com showing a diagram of what Kythera's current study/hypothesis (and this thread) is all about that I was able to find through google: https://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/threads/setipiprant-frequently-asked-questions.111509/

But I'll admit I mispoke above. I didn't mean to say PGD2 is directly downstream from DHT, but rather DHT increases PTGDS, which in turn increases PGD2 downstream from ARA. Here's an easy diagram to visualize my initial statement that less DHT = less PGD2:

View attachment 90696

2) By "hitting" I didn't mean "damaging", if that's what you're getting at. You've got blood vessels all throughout your scalp, and they're attached to and "feed" your follicles. Good luck putting something on your scalp that will reach your follicles and not your bloodstream. So you don't have to google that:
View attachment 90697
3) That's a quarter of a percent solution. TINY. Here's the full study, which concludes that, "A strong and similar inhibition of plasma DHT was found after 1 week of treatment with the topical and tablet finasteride formulations, albeit finasteride plasma exposure was significantly lower with the topical than with the oral product (p<0.0001)."
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...ndrogen-levels-in-healthy-male-volunteers.pdf Again, b/c finasteride is a suicide inhibitor, plasma exposure in any amount is still plasma exposure. That's why people continue to report sides on HandW's topical product, and why other attempts at a topical DHT-inhibitor have all failed so far.

5) If a study's already been posted in this very forum, do you honestly expect users to repost it every time they make mention of it? It's not my job to educate you. You can either read up yourself (like I did) or you can continue to stay in the dark and shout "broscience" at your leisure. Totally your call, man.
So this diagram... So a decrease of PGD2 can cause an increase chance of prostate cancer? So taking seti is practically increasing my chances of prostate cancer?
 

anon082

Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
43
Hey can anyone tell me what's the lowest price they were quoted for a gram of seti?
the prices i got were 5.8-6.8/gram depending on the quantity of purchase, anyone got a better deal?

Also to people who are already using seti what would you say is a solid amount to take daily for maintenance ( i know that 2 doses of 1gram a day is best but that's quite expensive to handle).
 

Sliceofbread

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
133
Hey can anyone tell me what's the lowest price they were quoted for a gram of seti?
the prices i got were 5.8-6.8/gram depending on the quantity of purchase, anyone got a better deal?

Also to people who are already using seti what would you say is a solid amount to take daily for maintenance ( i know that 2 doses of 1gram a day is best but that's quite expensive to handle).

You find a good supplier?
 

brohawk

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
82
1) what u linked is from this https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987714000279 and as u can see from the title it is a medical hypotheses , and not something tested and confirmed . Although i do believe in a connection between pgd2 and dht , i have yet to see a study on their relation
2)cool story mate , whatever.
3)0.25% w/v sounds tiny , but it is not tiny , as 1 ml contains 2.5 mg of finasteride .
some people report sides because h&w dosage is huge (2.5 % ) , not sure why they chose it
google p3074 phase 2 and see how 0.22 and 0.44 mg with their vehicle topically behave , when you say all attempts failed which attempts do u speak of ?
4)after 3 theres is a 4 usually
5) I ve read a ton of stuff on HairLossTalk.com btt hlh over the years , and a good deal of them are dubious , some are pure trash . If you want to make bold statements you better link reliable sources . Otherwise you should phrase them to not sound like facts , because you might educate readers on false info

1) No, that sciencedirect study actually hypothesizes that increased levels of DHT and thus PGD2 in those w/ Androgenetic Alopecia may have developed to protect those men from prostate cancer. Not anything I was talking about. The chart cited in that hypothesis, showing downstream metabolites of ARA though, is based on many proven studies thus why I liked just the chart. I don't suppose you believe there's a connection between pgd2 and dht b/c it just seems, oh I don't know, logical, even though we don't yet know for sure?
2) You asked for clarification, I answered. Way to be a petty c***.
3) Yes, phase 2 showed smaller doses reduced scalp DHT by less, and went systemic less. Still went systemic. ~50% scalp reduction for 24 - 48% serum reduction is not exactly a success IMO either.
4) I was obviously responding to your bullet points w/ the same #) as yours. Since you didn't have anything to really say w/ your 4), I didn't either. Please see my point 2) above if need be.
5) Yes, I agree that the public hairloss forums are cesspools of general idiocy, misinformation, and anecdotal reports at best. Maybe you should reread Pigeon's previous post, then TK421's reply to his, and then read my reply to TK421 in actual context. It was obviously the most simple and straight fwd way to explain why, logically, Seti probably wouldn't work for someone if Fina already didn't.
 

Btg

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
540
1) No, that sciencedirect study actually hypothesizes that increased levels of DHT and thus PGD2 in those w/ Androgenetic Alopecia may have developed to protect those men from prostate cancer. Not anything I was talking about. The chart cited in that hypothesis, showing downstream metabolites of ARA though, is based on many proven studies thus why I liked just the chart. I don't suppose you believe there's a connection between pgd2 and dht b/c it just seems, oh I don't know, logical, even though we don't yet know for sure?
2) You asked for clarification, I answered. Way to be a petty c***.
3) Yes, phase 2 showed smaller doses reduced scalp DHT by less, and went systemic less. Still went systemic. ~50% scalp reduction for 24 - 48% serum reduction is not exactly a success IMO either.
4) I was obviously responding to your bullet points w/ the same #) as yours. Since you didn't have anything to really say w/ your 4), I didn't either. Please see my point 2) above if need be.
5) Yes, I agree that the public hairloss forums are cesspools of general idiocy, misinformation, and anecdotal reports at best. Maybe you should reread Pigeon's previous post, then TK421's reply to his, and then read my reply to TK421 in actual context. It was obviously the most simple and straight fwd way to explain why, logically, Seti probably wouldn't work for someone if Fina already didn't.
"showing downstream metabolites of ARA though, is based on many proven studies thus why I liked just the chart" link them , i didnt find any .
You dont state things as facts because they sound logical to you , thats not how science works.
Serum DHT was reduced by only -24/-26% with 100 and 200 μL , The doses of 100 and 200 μL P-3074 resulted in a -47/-52% scalp DHT reduction , so 25 % serum with 50 % scalp doesnt look good to you ? Oh yeah you wrote 24-48 to prove your point , you took the numbers from 300/ 400 ml although the point of the study was the efficacy of the 100/200 ml as easily seen by the conclusion :
CONCLUSIONS:
The novel finasteride 0.25% solution applied o.d. at the doses of 100 and 200 μL results in an appropriate inhibition of scalp DHT potentially minimizing the untoward sexual side-effects linked to a systemic DHT reduction.

Your original post stated that topical finasteride doesnt work , which you dont know if it does , and also stated that setipiprant works (which we still dont know if and how well it works, allergan studies are not out yet ) , but you say its effect is relative to finasteride's , since you target pgd2 instead of dht, believing that dht acts through and upregulates pgd2 (which you dont know if it is true and to what extent) .
I called you out because you stated your beliefs as facts , and still do .
 
Last edited:

brohawk

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
82
"showing downstream metabolites of ARA though, is based on many proven studies thus why I liked just the chart" link them , i didnt find any .
You dont state things as facts because they sound logical to you , thats not how science works.
Serum DHT was reduced by only -24/-26% with 100 and 200 μL , The doses of 100 and 200 μL P-3074 resulted in a -47/-52% scalp DHT reduction , so 25 % serum with 50 % scalp doesnt look good to you ? Oh yeah you wrote 24-48 to prove your point , you took the numbers from 300/ 400 ml although the point of the study was the efficacy of the 100/200 ml as easily seen by the conclusion :
CONCLUSIONS:
The novel finasteride 0.25% solution applied o.d. at the doses of 100 and 200 μL results in an appropriate inhibition of scalp DHT potentially minimizing the untoward sexual side-effects linked to a systemic DHT reduction.

Your original post stated that topical finasteride doesnt work , which you dont know if it does , and also stated that setipiprant works (which we still dont know if and how well it works, allergan studies are not out yet ) , but you say its effect is relative to finasteride's , since you target pgd2 instead of dht, believing that dht acts through and upregulates pgd2 (which you dont know if it is true and to what extent) .
I called you out because you stated your beliefs as facts , and still do .

Yes, those results are sh*t IMO. 50% scalp reduction may be enough to stop some people's loss and may not for others. All these years and there still isn't an effective, sideless topical finasteride on the market. Who knows, maybe it'll happen some day but I really don't care either way and I see no point in arguing about it further. Will leave it to the rest of this forum to complain about their mostly imaginary sides while waiting for their topical holy grail.

And where did I state that Seti works? Where did I state its effect is relative to finasteride? As facts? Maybe if I had posted "ALL FACTS" instead of "THUS LOGIC" at the end of my "finasteride or dutasteride = less DHT = less PGD2. Seti/fevi = less PGD2." blurb then you might have a point. As it stands, you're complaining about my wording. B/c my wording made YOU interpret what I said as if it was factual and not a probable deduction. When taken out of context. Thread derailed enough. Get over it.

And for the record, we actually do know dht upregulates pgd2. Here's a study showing such: www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/2/556/pdf And yes, to what extent pgd2 is the culprit of Androgenetic Alopecia we don't yet know, thus why we're all waiting to see Allergan's results, and again what this thread is supposed to be about.
 

SamFT

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
432
Lol, I quit fina because of sides and went to seti.



No, I'm off it for 2 months now. Been on it for 7 months although at a very low dose 200mg/day. Look a page or two back to know my results.



Sure, I agree, I'm not a scientist, just my theory. Anyway we'll know official results soon enough I hope since trials ended.
Why did you quit pigeon? If you achieved maintenance why would you stop?
 

bassa

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
35
Used 2g seti for 1 month : a lot of itch (which I haven't had for years, I have very mild Hairloss) and had more shed than before. Also had trouble sleeping. So made me decide to stop.

After 3 months I started again, but now with just 0.5 g a day. : no itch, it stopped hairs falling out and no sleeping problems.. So this gives me hope. Btw it's the same batch of seti.

Perhaps it is dose depending on the aggressiveness of your Androgenetic Alopecia. Maybe to much suppresion of pgd2 is also not good, maybe it is the ratio of pgd2 and pge2.? Who knows...
 

talesofdahustle

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
85
Had maintenance for a long time but after 6 months+ had a shed that lasted more than a month. Was running out of supply, etc.

And wanted to quit for a while to see if I there were any changes.

So you took seti for 6 months and had maintenance, stopped and then had a shed that lasted more than a month. Is your hair doing worse now that your off seti and what are you taking?
 

SamFT

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
432
Had maintenance for a long time but after 6 months+ had a shed that lasted more than a month. Was running out of supply, etc.

And wanted to quit for a while to see if I there were any changes.
Ahh I see. Yeah I’ve actually been in seti for like 5 months now? No itch at all. About to run out and ordered 100g more. Going to see how my hair looks at the end of the year and determine if I’ve actually held my ground.
 

SamFT

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
432
Any updates from you guys?

I am taking seti for a month now, shedding lots of long healthy hairs now.
Is the shedding going to stop?
Got my seti from kane.
My shed lasted up to my 5th week I think? I shed a few healthy hairs as well.
 

rocket_hare

Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
12
I just got 1 gram of PGE2, I'll by trying it as prescribed in this thread.

1mg PGE2 with 3 ml distilled water every 2-3 days plus micro needling.

I've been trying to verify this method of delivery for PGE2 if anyone has other methods or is using this one at this frequency let me know.

Thanks!
 

Sliceofbread

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
133
I am also on finasteride for 18 months so I dont really know which one induced the shed.
But I cant remember to have such a shed before on finasteride only. Just maintenance on finasteride.
Well the shed is worse, I definitely lost ground.
I hope the hair regrows..

Did you mostly shed minituarized hairs while being on Seti?

Did it help with your itching?
 
Top