The reactions(from anonymous internet users) to people who get hair transplants

[Saurabhaj]

Many guys who are balding knows about tofacitinib.

Yesterday.. I read one about one chemical compound which is not properly documented on web.

I read this in My medical Book.

One drug called " Eflornithine"..
Very famous and essential drug in who list..
Is used to treat Hirsutism in females.
It blocks Putrescine.. A chemical compound that promotes hair follicle growth.


By the way..
Introducing a drug is no joke..

 

[Swoop]

on the after results video the hair line clearly looks fake. it doesn't look natural.

Nah, I disagree. Almost nobody would notice that that is a hair transplant. It's a pretty nice soft result. In fact I know this almost for certain based on my interactions with people from 5-6 months in when my hair transplant wasn't even fully matured. I thought people would notice, but literally nobody peaked above with their eyes to have a look at my hairline. This was a whole different fashion when I had my baldite NW3 temples and had a swooping hairstyle to the side to cover my temples. Sometimes I would interact with people and they would look at my baldite temples, especially when I had thin weak brittle hair. You know they would shift from eye contact to have a peak at my hairline.

Now I don't have it at all when interacting. This means that it flows naturally and there isn't something "off" for people to notice. Meanwhile aesthetics are enhanced by framing my face. I'm fairly sure the same would apply to the guy in the movie.

And remember he was totally bald in the frontal area. No native hair or frontal forelock to back his hair transplant up aside from some sh*t hair from a botched hair transplant.

 

[jd_uk]

Jup, transplanting only chest hair to a baldite head is indeed ridiculous. Won't look good, period.




Some go to cheap doctors and come out with a killer result. Was just watching this one, literally life changing...

Before;

[video=youtube;HU1q6-zbZwg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HU1q6-zbZwg[/video]



Check after result;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGBtUcmN-R4

I actually think that guy looks better before. He suits a shaved head/bald look and the transplant is ever going to give him a thinning hair look.

 

[jd_uk]

Some hair is always better than no hair.

Not in his case in my opinion. I think he looks more masculine and just better in the outdoor photos where he looks most bald.

 

[FWIW]

I actually think that guy looks better before. He suits a shaved head/bald look and the transplant is ever going to give him a thinning hair look.

You really are in denial arent you. Yeah, that looks totaly thinnig weak *** dolly plugs:


:stfu:

 

[Rudiger]

He doesn't look the worst bald but he's still definitely not in that rare 10% (or way less) that actually looks better. OK he looks better bald than diffuse hair with length, at that stage either buzz it short, bic it completely, or start treatment.

As much as I believe jd_uk can have his personal opinion up to a point, he should acknowledge he's on a completely, completely different wavelength than the rest of this forum (and most of society) if he thinks that his hair post-transplant looks worse than being bald. Fine if it's of your opinion he looks alright bald, as I say he somewhat gets away with it as much as most, but casually implying that the transplant has to look bad, when it clearly doesn't, is just reaching a step too far.

 

[Saurabhaj]

No single/unmarried guy look better bald.
But once he gets married and have family..
Like when he is in 30 plus..
He may look better.

 

[Rudiger]

Nobody looks BETTER bald: you may look good, decent, okay, but not better. Nobody looks better without hair.

In the past I've said the same thing, that you can only possibly look AS GOOD bald as you do with hair, but never better. But there's been a few exceptions (as there always is, there's never such a thing as "nobody") when guys have **** mousey wirey hair, and a receding hair line actually ended up doing them a favour.

Of course you can always argue a buzzed dark stubble is an option for any guy with hair, which technically isn't "bald" as we know it on this forum and looks better than shiny, but a lot of guys wouldn't ever consider it if they always have a strong hair line and no diffusing, and go on living with their crappy hair, never knowing that they'd look way less laughable if they buzzed it short.

There was a guy on this forum that was a perfect example (if anyone else can remember/find the topic), and wasn't even like 8/10 or anything but with a large enough prominent jaw and stubble, decent head shape, he was an actual improvement on his crappy hair he had before buzzing.

He never would have known without receding.

 

[Dante92]

In the past I've said the same thing, that you can only possibly look AS GOOD bald as you do with hair, but never better. But there's been a few exceptions (as there always is, there's never such a thing as "nobody") when guys have **** mousey wirey hair, and a receding hair line actually ended up doing them a favour.

Of course you can always argue a buzzed dark stubble is an option for any guy with hair, which technically isn't "bald" as we know it on this forum and looks better than shiny, but a lot of guys wouldn't ever consider it if they always have a strong hair line and no diffusing, and go on living with their crappy hair, never knowing that they'd look way less laughable if they buzzed it short.

There was a guy on this forum that was a perfect example (if anyone else can remember/find the topic), and wasn't even like 8/10 or anything but with a large enough prominent jaw and stubble, decent head shape, he was an actual improvement on his crappy hair he had before buzzing.

He never would have known without receding.

It would be interesting to know how he's faring now, and his experiences, before saying that he looks better bald.

 

[Rudiger]

HE didn't say it, everyone else did. For one thread only this place became like SlyBaldGuys, and I think I was one of the few who realised how odd that was. Even hellouser openly admitted it. The poster himself was as depressed as any bald guy and just asking opinions originally, and only with people's positive reactions did he start to think it might be fine.

Now I don't know for sure everyone saying it looked good meant it looked "better" but in my opinion, slick shaved vs wooly mediocrity there was pretty much no competition, he looked quite a lot better.

And I didn't even realise it at first (me as the apparently "deluded positive" type on here), I probably just glanced and thought "bald" like how everyone does but I wasn't paying attention, when other people pointed out it looked fine I then saw what they mean.

It would be interesting to know how he's faring now, and his experiences, before saying that he looks better bald.

This is totally implying he MUST have gone through some harrowing tales and now is in the depths of depression, because that's the experience of you and people you find are like minded.

But again, there's no such thing as "nobody", and once you stop attaching yourself to extremist binary thoughts about everything related to attractiveness and who knows what else, and the experience of you and anyone you want to know applying to everybody, maybe you can understand what actual realism, variances, and balance, is.

 

[Roberto_72]

Not in his case in my opinion. I think he looks more masculine and just better in the outdoor photos where he looks most bald.

JD have you seen what AMAZING transplant this guy has had? Have you seen the density AT CROWN? it is a miracle hair transplant, he looks 10 years younger. I even doubt it is for real because... How can he have so long hair only seven months after the transplant? When did hair shock-fell and regrew?
and you say he looked better bald.

 

[jd_uk]

JD have you seen what AMAZING transplant this guy has had? Have you seen the density AT CROWN? it is a miracle hair transplant, he looks 10 years younger. I even doubt it is for real because... How can he have so long hair only seven months after the transplant? When did hair shock-fell and regrew?
and you say he looked better bald.

Are we even talking about the same guy? The one i saw had a frontal scalp hair transplant and i genuinely think he doesn't look bad bald and better than the thin look the hair transplant gives.

This is where even members of this forum aren't on a par with most of society...a lot of people think bald is better than obviously thinning hair.

Maybe there are follow ups that i havent seen.

 

[Swoop]

Are we even talking about the same guy? The one i saw had a frontal scalp hair transplant and i genuinely think he doesn't look bad bald and better than the thin look the hair transplant gives.

This is where even members of this forum aren't on a par with most of society...a lot of people think bald is better than obviously thinning hair.

Maybe there are follow ups that i havent seen.

You saw this one? It's 7 months out, his hair probably even matured a bit after that.

How can you say this is a thin look?

[video=youtube;ZGBtUcmN-R4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGBtUcmN-R4[/video]

 

[marco75]

Nobody looks BETTER bald: you may look good, decent, okay, but not better. Nobody looks better without hair.

True Dante, hair is always better no doubt, but once your passed NW2-3 it better to buzz it. Also having some shade/stubble on top is better than slick even when buzzed short. Some guys take only a minor hit or almost neutral if they had crappy hair before or are a bit older, but this depends on the degree of balding a slick scalp usually is difficult to carry off.

 

[jd_uk]

You saw this one? It's 7 months out, his hair probably even matured a bit after that.

How can you say this is a thin look?

[video=youtube;ZGBtUcmN-R4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGBtUcmN-R4[/video]

I didn't see this one...that is a good hair transplant...but i'm kinda sceptical too because hair grows by around 1cm per month and it typically sheds after a transplant. So i don't see how it can be that long at 7 months. Also did he have a crown transplant too because thats not was is drawn on in that first video...?

It looks good but i still maintain that he doesn't look bad bald.

 

[Rudiger]

I don't know how exactly you can be sceptical, that's definitely the man's hair. And hair grows 2 or 3 times faster than a centimetre a month (at least 1/2 an inch every 4 weeks).

 

[jd_uk]

I don't know how exactly you can be sceptical, that's definitely the man's hair. And hair grows 2 or 3 times faster than a centimetre a month (at least 1/2 an inch every 4 weeks).

1/2 an inch per month is about right and that isn't 2 to 3 times more. Did he have extra crown work which isn't shown?

 

[Dench57]

It's an improvement and the thickness is impressive but what's with the hairline? Is it still pinkish at 7 months?

 

[FWIW]

Lol look at his videos,one of the best results I have seen.Make THAT density on slick head?This is not common at all.This is result from other universe. Somr people here are really clueless.

 

[infinitepain]

People find disgusting that you modify your body to improve. They are mad at it.
It's all about improving, and faking that you are genetically superior. So if you get a hair transplant, nobody can know. You need to disappear before you are too bald to be known as bald, and appear again with hair as if nothing happened. Of course unless you are one of the rare cases where you are on finasteride and you have no sides and the hairloss stopped, you are fucked since a hair transplant will not save the rest of your hair and the transplanted hair will fall again in 10 years unless you are on finasteride.