The Real Reason That Women Freeze Their Eggs

[CaptainForehead]

lol dexter's wife was supercute
View attachment 58380

but very annoying with that NT stuff from her mouth

I liked her. Never found her annoying.

 

[CaptainForehead]

Exactly that. Skyler on the other hand... I just wanted to punch her in the face
View attachment 58382

I don't get the hate against Skyler. I really don't.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

I don't get the hate against Skyler. I really don't.

That woman was actually hot when she was young. Look up the same actress in Deadwood she looked great.

Within Breaking Bad I didn't hate her, but I think people saw her as nagging Walter and thus disrupting the power fantasy. The power fantasy was an aspect of that show.

Honestly, I liked all the characters on that show, they all worked.

 

[samantha3333]

the only reasons I would have children are 1. wanting a family with the love of my life 2. wanting to nurture someone who looks just like me. Seeing 1 is unlikely, I guess as long as I get over my ego, adoption seems a better idea.

So many threads about the opposite sex here but I just want to feel happy by myself. Even that Seems unlikely I don't even care if I'll get a bf anymore.

 

[blackg]

Only fired? They'd probably get sued and end up in a shitstorm as well.

Or promoted.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Or promoted.

Was this in the mining industry?

 

[blackg]

View attachment 58376

Cope for life worthy.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

No... she was not hot IMO. Absolutely zero charm.
She is just annoying, passive agressive and then she cheats on Walter with that insurance guy, yuck. But mostly it's about her face, you see her face, you want to punch her.

I don't relate I don't feel that aggression at all.

I thought she was great in Deadwood.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

What's this bias about mining industry!!!

It's super macho. I did a year of mining engineering. Plus Australia would make it even more macho.

 

[blackg]

Was this in the mining industry?

Finance.

 

[Exodus2011]

It's not sexism, it's curiosity. Women do the same thing.

i know. just loooool

"IMO even benevolent curiosity of scientific idols' life is weird and intrusive. Why does it matter so much if your idol is married?"

kids thats what i call:
H A V I N G
I T
F U C K I N G
E A S Y

also lol is this a sluthater?

 

[Roberto_72]

saw Guardian....surprised it wasn't written by Jessica Valenti, who seems like the most self absorbed person on the planet


View attachment 58348

lol

Lol. What sane woman doesn't like like whistles and stares? I know I appreciate them, yes, even if they come from 55yr old men. If they grope you against your will it's a different story, but positive validation for your appearance is always nice whether it be a hot 20yr old hunk or a middle aged beta.

I will be honest and I will say what I think about this topic at the risk of sounding chauvinistic.

The author of the article writes that "our culture" makes her regret the times when she was cat-called. I do not think our culture has anything to do with it. As EvilLocks cleverly reminds, it is mostly about personal gratification. For both men and women.

Women buy nice dresses and designer shoes because they like it and they want to look good in front of men, as do men in front of women.

Everyone has always liked to be liked. What "our culture" has got to do with it is beyond my grasp.

 

[Exodus2011]

Validation from cute compatible girls = the purpose of life

 

[blackg]

I will be honest and I will say what I think about this topic at the risk of sounding chauvinistic.

The author of the article writes that "our culture" makes her regret the times when she was cat-called. I do not think our culture has anything to do with it. As EvilLocks cleverly reminds, it is mostly about personal gratification. For both men and women.

Women buy nice dresses and designer shoes because they like it and they want to look good in front of men, as do men in front of women.

Everyone has always liked to be liked. What "our culture" has got to do with it is beyond my grasp.

I think she means that these validation incidents you mentioned are not so much innate.. but more cultural.
Our looks observed culture definitely amplifies these things.

 

[That Guy]

I will be honest and I will say what I think about this topic at the risk of sounding chauvinistic.

The author of the article writes that "our culture" makes her regret the times when she was cat-called. I do not think our culture has anything to do with it. As EvilLocks cleverly reminds, it is mostly about personal gratification. For both men and women.

Women buy nice dresses and designer shoes because they like it and they want to look good in front of men, as do men in front of women.

Everyone has always liked to be liked. What "our culture" has got to do with it is beyond my grasp.

Your posts about feminism in this thread have inspired me

Brace yourselves for a vaguely-relevant rant:

I think the modern SJW feminism like what plagues YouTube now is starting to fall.

Laci Green recently did a bit of a 180 and talked about taking "the red pill" and she lost support because of her willingness to debate with anti-feminist YouTubers now.

All of the neckbeard conservatives on YouTube are jerking each other off about how they've "won" and made a YouTube feminazi general "wake up", but I have a different theory.

Many of these Tumblr/YouTube feminist chicks are nearing 30 years old and that clock is starting to tick. It doesn't matter how much these girls rant about men and male privilege, make no mistake, they crave the dick ("I miss being cat called") just as much as any other straight woman. Sane men their age are not going to want to date a hardcore feminist and more young men than ever are becoming aware of how nuts and controlling these women are. Men in their 30s or older would also likely be either hitched by now or dating younger women.

So I think that for Laci Green and others like her, their obsessive political opinions and reputation is probably hurting their sex lives and that's the reason they are shifting gears — it's dawning on them that the sands of time for finding a man, starting a family and settling down are starting to run out.

Otherwise, it will just be them and their cats forever.

 

[davesmith420]

I had a oneitis for the longest time; the girl had a 6 face at best and was chubby (according to a few posters here I'm a 7 so I was shooting perfectly in my league). Her and I were in this weird FWB relationship, a few times we talked about being in a relationship but she would always call it off. I eventually had to cut off all contact with her because hanging out with her always made me feel like sh*t. I sometimes check her social media accounts for kicks and all I see are posts by her bitching about being single. Makes me want to cut my dick off.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

While it might hold some truth for certain writers/participants, I think this is a largely spurious assertion and derived from a charicature of these writers. The broader picture is that aggressive identity politics seem to be fading in importance since Trump's election. In my opinion there is a consensus forming among left-wing writers that this was misguided path for the left and largely a hindrance to gaining power due to the shrillness and tone-deaf nature of its arguments. In-fighting over petty stuff like cultural appropriation took precedence over tackling generational battles like climate change.

Interestingly, you now have the rise of the "dirtbag left", basically politically incorrect socialists. They are an alternative to the alt-right, and give voice to what are in my opinion the important issues the left champions. More importantly, they do so while steering clear of the stupid micro-battles that were so prevalent during the Obama years. Hopefully they'll continue gaining a following so we don't have to hear endless rants about SJWs anymore.

I think that your prognosis is optimistic and I don't share it.

There's a genuine, meaningful purpose to wedge issues like transgender bathrooms or partial birth abortions -- they help to divide people and get them to the polling booth. Hence the term "wedge issues" which is perfectly labelled. There's some (evil) cleverness in coming up with these, they help maintain the political status quo. There's an incentive to campaign on wedge issues. They're effective in nominally legitimizing the political process.

If you pick the right wedge issue, you can win. Karl Rove brilliantly encouraged gay marriage votes in a lot of states in 2004. It got social conservatives to show up at the polls, and Bush crushed Kerry.

The other factor is that they don't really matter. Unlike global warming, foreign policy, regulation of derivatives, etc. there are not trillions of dollars moving around on transgender bathrooms. For the Democratic party to actually campaign on global warming it would need to offer very substantive reforms that are not necessarily supported by lobbyists, donors, and the permanent bureaucracy.

I don't perceive much change thus far, nor do I expect much change moving forward. The policies will be very similar, though we might not get as nauseating a campaign slogan as "I'm with her."

 

[CaptainForehead]

saw Guardian....surprised it wasn't written by Jessica Valenti, who seems like the most self absorbed person on the planet


View attachment 58348

lol

The wording is important here. It wasn't "our culture places a high value on the looks of women" or something similar, it is "our culture makes me ..."

If anything bad happens to women, it is always entirely under the control of others, and women can never influence the outcome. Always.
However, women can still be president of the US. And be commander in chief of the most powerful army in the world.

 

[hanginginthewire]

Here's a good review of "Sex Object" - the terrible Jessica Valenti book. Its long but I recommend it.


https://medium.com/the-patriarch-tree/lessons-of-a-sex-object-4b57f666dec5

Valenti reminds me of that guy - his name escapes me - he's like a frat douche ....its like Tyler Durden or something, but its obviously not that..he writes in crass terms about his hookups ....they made a movie I think? I would google it but I don't know what to search for. Anyway, that's how Valenti's book reads - only she puts this pathetic veneer of "feminism" over everything. Oh wait...Tucker Max?? I think that's it. Anyway, so many of these "feminist" writers are taken seriously as "activists" instead of craven, self-aggrandizing douchebags, which is what they really are.

Zircon's post was excellent. The hypocrisy of the left at this time (and the last several years) is staggering and shocking. I'm always amazed when I see lefties mocking Trump's appearance for instance. Meanwhile a remark about Carly Fiorina's face is a national outrage. Trump Derangement Syndrome was a funny joke at first but it turned out to be true! And I certainly did not and would not vote for Trump. Anyone can see (except the brain dead establishment left) that about 75% of Trump's antics are a smokescreen for corporatism to hide behind. I say 75% because Trump is speaking out against the problem of illegal immigration, which is a blow against the globalists and the corporatists. Jesse Jackson and Caesar Chavez used to stand at the border and condemn illegal immigration, but the economic left has been destroyed by the identitarians. But yeah, since the left offers absolutely nothing to flyover country working class Americans, the voters decided to vote to 1) try to stem the disatorous tide of illegal immigration and 2) for the lulz. I feel like the left and right have switched in some capacities. Where once you laughed at a**h** clowns like Glenn Beck and the tea party, now you see dumbass Rachel Maddow and "the Resistance" and just shake your head in disgust. Anyway, I could go on and on. Sorry for the spelling errors and rambling. I could articulate it better but I can see most of you see it and communicate it even better.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Here's a good review of "Sex Object" - the terrible Jessica Valenti book. Its long but I recommend it.


https://medium.com/the-patriarch-tree/lessons-of-a-sex-object-4b57f666dec5

Valenti reminds me of that guy - his name escapes me - he's like a frat douche ....its like Tyler Durden or something, but its obviously not that..he writes in crass terms about his hookups ....they made a movie I think? I would google it but I don't know what to search for. Anyway, that's how Valenti's book reads - only she puts this pathetic veneer of "feminism" over everything. Oh wait...Tucker Max?? I think that's it. Anyway, so many of these "feminist" writers are taken seriously as "activists" instead of craven, self-aggrandizing douchebags, which is what they really are.

Zircon's post was excellent. The hypocrisy of the left at this time (and the last several years) is staggering and shocking. I'm always amazed when I see lefties mocking Trump's appearance for instance. Meanwhile a remark about Carly Fiorina's face is a national outrage. Trump Derangement Syndrome was a funny joke at first but it turned out to be true! And I certainly did not and would not vote for Trump. Anyone can see (except the brain dead establishment left) that about 75% of Trump's antics are a smokescreen for corporatism to hide behind. I say 75% because Trump is speaking out against the problem of illegal immigration, which is a blow against the globalists and the corporatists. Jesse Jackson and Caesar Chavez used to stand at the border and condemn illegal immigration, but the economic left has been destroyed by the identitarians. But yeah, since the left offers absolutely nothing to flyover country working class Americans, the voters decided to vote to 1) try to stem the disatorous tide of illegal immigration and 2) for the lulz. I feel like the left and right have switched in some capacities. Where once you laughed at a**h** clowns like Glenn Beck and the tea party, now you see dumbass Rachel Maddow and "the Resistance" and just shake your head in disgust. Anyway, I could go on and on. Sorry for the spelling errors and rambling. I could articulate it better but I can see most of you see it and communicate it even better.

That review is very long and honestly it was painful to read for me. Not just painful due to cringe but painful as a reminder of what I was missing.

Valenti seems to have lived a life of non stop parties, cocaine, f*****g, et cetera. She dropped out of college and had to transfer to a weak university. She would wake up at 400pm in the afternoon, and then watch movies and order pizza to get over her hangovers while in early career stage. I know where I'd be if I had tried to behave that way, maybe in jail, or dead, or working a low status job like filling shopping bags at the checkout of Safeway. In part, I've worked hard in my life because I understood that I had no choice.

That's not what's happened to her -- she's failed upwards. She had (has?) a works famous blog and us writing for the Guardian. She has a beta provider boyfriend who is slightly above average and seems to worship her. Her life is for all intents and purposes ... wait for it ... Privileged. Easy.

But that's not how she sees it. She sees herself as a victim, and the world celebrates her tenacity is being a victim who has overcome overwhelming odds. She has perseverence and maybe she's a role model to young girls.

An other aspect that bothered me is that she seems to have gone through life with little self awareness. Perhaps the review is unfair to get, I don't know. But she's critical of men for expecting women to wear makeup and heels while she herself celebrates height, broad shoulders, chiseled frames, big arms, big dicks, popularity, etc. Has nobody told her of the discrepancy? Possibly not. The two are actually not symmetric actually. Makeup and heels are available to nearly all women. Height and popularity are not, and in the case of the latter, it takes work.

Tldr: The top three privileges a person can have:
Health
Beauty
Money

Valenti is treated well because of her looks, and her writing is equivalent to rich people who complain about the servant problem.