- Reaction score
- 315
because ive seen people here with really big galeas, and they deny it and say that it only loks big because their hairline is receding and they'd rather blame their hairloss on inheriting a 'sensitivity to dht gene' from their estranged uncle
I think the theory can be better explained as the splanchno to neuro ratio which I addressed in the other thread. It is face to brain ratio basically. Its not that the galea is big in absolute terms, rather its big compared to the face. Those men which have "small" galeas might sometimes have bigger galeas then men who have "big" gales when it is actually their face which is small.
Inheritance of baldness is not understood. Also your theory needs predictive power, if a person inherits the bad face to brain ratio from a parent then they should have a significant statistically high chance of inheriting it.
Also those people have a large chance of keeping their hair if they take finasteride, so what gives?