Tinder The Really Hard Truth About Girls

[nameless]

CNN and BBC are just trafficking in anti-Russoan propaganda and are not credible sources on Ukraine.

You've got the right-wing Conspiracy-theory thing going on I see.

 

[nameless]

I agree with this...

I think he failed in some areas but i think he excelled in others.

I think he is one of the best Presidents..I mean in my life its Ford, Carter, Regan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama....

I liked Clinton and Obama--but i can find great fault with both.

I find much, much more fault with all the others.

( I dont think David is a conservative-even if he were who cares?)

I'll explain why it matters later. I have some things to do right now.

 

[hairblues]

And of course you're right. They've both done some good stuff and they've both made some mistakes.

But David hates on literally EVERYTHING they did. He says Obama is one of the worse presidents ever and everything Obama did was a failure. He blames Obama for a bad economy even though the economy isn't really bad right now and Obama who fixed the economy after Dave's conservative darlings wrecked the economy.

The only way David could hate literally EVERYTHING that Clinton and Obama have done is if David's a rabid conservative.

He is definitely NOT a leftie. I think he pretends to be a leftie because he thinks that will make him more acceptable to you women here.

David even blames Mexico's problems on Obama. WTF is with that?

thats not necessarily true because i have friends on the left who were STRONG opponents to Obama and HRC...they wanted Bernie Sanders (as did I) and when he was not an option they turned to Jill Stein--whih to me was a waste of a vote 1. I am not very impressed with her 2. she did not stand a chance. Only thing i liked about her was her idea about student loan debts...

 

[nameless]

You're an Obamabot.

Obama is a complete, colossal failure as president. No positive legacy. Economy ruined. Middle East ruined. Libya destroyed. Mexico destroyed. Russia on the rise.

Awful president.

Maybe not as bad as Clinton would have been.

Here is David expressing that Obama is a COMPLETE failure and says Clinton would have been even worse. Since David says Obama is a complete failure and Clinton could have been a worse failure than even Obama this means that David believes that Clinton would have been an even bigger failure than a complete failure.

 

[hairblues]

@nameless Your idea that David is pretending to be left to have the women here like him really does not make sense..I am pretty sure i am only woman on here who leans left...And even if they did i dont think he is someone who puts on any pretense...He pretty much seems like a straight shooter.

 

[hairblues]

Here is David expressing that Obama is a COMPLETE failure and says Clinton would have been even worse. Since David says Obama is a complete failure and Clinton could have been a worse failure than even Obama this means that David believes that David believes that Clinton would have been an even bigger failure than a complete failure.

He didn't say it but it looks pretty obvious to me that David is pleased that Trump won the election.

Does not mean that.

Some people saw Trump and HRC equally bad options--Persoanlly i dont agree wit that at all--but i had many friends on left who felt that way. And most of them voted Stein.

 

[nameless]

thats not necessarily true because i have friends on the left who were STRONG opponents to Obama and HRC...they wanted Bernie Sanders (as did I) and when he was not an option they turned to Jill Stein--whih to me was a waste of a vote 1. I am not very impressed with her 2. she did not stand a chance. Only thing i liked about her was her idea about student loan debts...

Good points but I may get back to you on this later.

Or maybe not. Things have strayed too far into politics so I'm ready to move on if you are

But I'm pretty sure that David's a very active conservative. He says he's worked on campaigns so he's way more active in politics than I am.

 

[hairblues]

Good points but I will get back to you on this later.

Or maybe not. We've probably strayed too far into politics so I'm ready to move on.

I'm pretty sure that David supports Trump and I'm pretty sure David's an extreme conservative. He says he's worked on campaigns so he's way more active in politics than I am.

He is not from America..so its different in different countries.

 

[nameless]

@nameless Your idea that David is pretending to be left to have the women here like him really does not make sense..I am pretty sure i am only woman on here who leans left...And even if they did i dont think he is someone who puts on any pretense...He pretty much seems like a straight shooter.

I'm satisfied that David is an extremist right-winger and David is pretending he's a left-winger for some reason. Am I 100% sure that he's trying to trick the women here so they will be more accepting of him? No. But that's what I think his reason is.

I don't think you're the only woman here who leans left. Psa and EL are both European. Even most right-wingers in Europe would be considered left-wingers in America. For example, David Cameron was the last conservative PM of UK and here in America he would be a democrat. I think EL would be center-left in America and I think Psa would be solid left in America. Neither of them come across as right-wing by American standards of right-wing. Although a lot of European left-wingers have recently moved to the right because left-wing leaders have screwed up the immigration issue big time so they might both be moving rightward because of the immigration fiasco in their countries.

Anyway, other than the European immigration fiasco I think that EL would be center-left and Psa would be left in America.

And if he is right-wing, and trying to conceal that fact, then he does put on pretenses and he's not a straight-shooter.

 

[nameless]

He is not from America..so its different in different countries.

But David still made it clear that he's very active in politics back home, wherever back home is for him. He's more involved in his party's agenda than I am in my party's agenda, that's for sure. Whichever agenda he supports, he supports that agenda a lot, and he REALLY, REALLY, REALLY wants the other side to lose.


Even the left-wingers who thinks Obama leaves a lot to be desired do not think Obama is a "complete" failure. That's extremist right-winger talk.

Here again, is a post by David:

"You're an Obamabot.

Obama is a complete, colossal failure as president. No positive legacy. Economy ruined. Middle East ruined. Libya destroyed. Mexico destroyed. Russia on the rise.

Awful president.

Maybe not as bad as Clinton would have been."

David's complaints about Obama (in the above post) have some merit but a lot of it is right-ring crap.

David even complains about the economy when any reasonable fair-minded person can see that the economy is doing OK, especially by comparison to the economy that Obama inherited. But David calls the economy (and I'm quoting here) "ruined". What a joke! The economy is not ruined. David's obviously talking extremist right-wing crap against President Obama.

And for David to blame Obama for Mexico's problems (whatever Mexico's problems are) is extreme right-wing, hate-on Obama crap. It exposes David's fanaticism in his hatred of the left because it's ridiculously unfair to blame Obama for Mexico's problems, whatever they are. Even the other extreme conservative I was arguing with - CopeForLife - can't figure out why David's ragging on Obama about Mexico.

And so what if Libya is a mess? Libya was also a mess before it became a mess. Does David remember dangerous whack-job Khaddaffi? Did David like the Khaddaffi regime better?

By calling Obama a "complete" failure David is saying that Obama has not done one good thing.

And notice how the only other politician David ragged on is Clinton - another left-wing politician.

And in his post above, David complains about Russia being on the rise (and yes David blames Obama for that like he blames Obama for everything) but the Jill Stein left-wingers think Russia isn't so bad so David isn't talking the Jill Stein leftie line.

 

[nameless]

lol at this rage and butthurt

There is no rage and butthurt coming from me CopeForLife.

I'm just matter-of-factly stating what I'm thinking.

You conservatives don't cause me butthurt and rage because I'm not the kind of person you extremists want to keep down and exclude. I'm a pretty white guy (when I have my hair) and when I'm missing hair I keep to myself (except for a few friends) so you extremist right-wingers only come across me when I have my hair. And in those instances it's at parties or wherever and you guys think I'm pretty cool because I cruise around in fancy sports cars with a different woman for each day of the week. In other words, I look the part of the ultimate winner and right-wingers love a winner.

So I have no personal butthurt or rage with you right-wingers. I just don't approve of you guys keeping women down and excluding minorities. I think it's morally inappropriate and I think this world has enough bounty for us all to share.

When I have my hair you right-wing extremists invite me to every party you guys have because you like the way I look. You guys love me but I dislike you guys. It's kind of like how Chris Christie loves Bruce Springsteen but Bruce Springsteen doesn't want anything to do with Chris Christie. And in case you don't know it, in this analogy I'm Bruce Springsteen and you're Chris Christie.

No Butthurt and rage here dude; I just look down on you and dislike you is all.

And like I said, the people who deny acceptance to others don't deserve acceptance for themselves. Hence. you deserve to be bald because baldness makes you unaccepted. You deserve to be bald so you got what you deserve.

Even though baldness has struck me I'm still happy that baldness exists because it struck you too. It's worth it to me to have to deal with this as long as it nails you to the wall too. And if Pilofocus achieves quality donor regeneration then it will be easy for me to get to it because the Doctor's in America and so am I. If the donor regeneration works I hope it costs too much for you to come to America to get it.

 

[nameless]

He is not from America..so its different in different countries.

Also, look at the below quote by David. This is not a left wing thing to say because he's badmouthing the mainstream media organizations which is something the conservative extremists do. Sarah Palin for example, calls the mainstream media the "Lame Stream Media".

"CNN and BBC are just trafficking in anti-Russoan propaganda and are not credible sources on Ukraine."

This statement above by David really comes off as typical extremist right-winger conspiracy theory crap. And in the above statement he's giving support to Russia, which is in line with Trump's sh!t. So Davis is carrying water for both Putin and Trump in his above post.

David is defending Russia's theft of Crimea, Russia's theft of Eastern Ukraine, Russia's destruction of Ukraine territory, and Russia's efforts to subjugate (enslave) all of the Ukraine people. Defending this behavior by Russia is what Donald Trump is doing.

David could be a Donald Trump conservative.

 

[nameless]

Ummm, hang on... So David's now a conservative?
I thought he was another "blame the third world's problems, entirely, on the West" acolyte.

I'm 99% sure of it.

And not just a conservative, but an EXTREME TRUMP-CONSERVATIVE.

 

[Guzam]

There is no rage and butthurt coming from me CopeForLife.

I'm just matter-of-factly stating how I feel.

You conservatives don't cause me butthurt and rage because I'm not the kind of person you extremists want to keep down and exclude. I'm a pretty white guy (when I have my hair) and when I'm missing hair I keep to myself (except for a few friends) so you extremist right-wingers only come across me when I have my hair. And in those instances it's at parties or wherever and you guys think I'm pretty cool because I cruise around in fancy sports cars with a different woman for each day of the week. In other words, I look the part of the ultimate winner and right-wingers love a winner.

So I have no personal butthurt or rage with you right-wingers. I just don't approve of you guys keeping women down and excluding minorities. I think it's morally inappropriate and I think this world has enough bounty for us all to share.

When I have my hair you right-wing extremists invite me to every party you guys have because you like the way I look. You guys love me but I dislike you guys. It's kind of like how Chris Christie loves Bruce Springsteen but Bruce Springsteen doesn't want anything to do with Chris Christie. And in case you don't know it, in this analogy I'm Bruce Springsteen and you're Chris Christie.

No Butthurt and rage here dude; I just look down on you and dislike you is all.

And like I said, the people who deny acceptance to others don't deserve acceptance for themselves. Hence. you deserve to be bald because baldness makes you unaccepted. You deserve to be bald so you got what you deserve.

Even though baldness has struck me I'm still happy that baldness exists because it struck you too. It's worth it to me to have to deal with this as long as it nails you to the wall too. And if Pilofocus achieves quality donor regeneration then it will be easy for me to get to it because the Doctor's in America and so am I. If the donor regeneration works I hope it costs too much for you to come to America to get it.

As always, the most vitriolic hate comes from left wing people. Sad!

 

[nameless]

As always, the most vitriolic hate comes from left wing people. Sad!

You got it all wrong Guzam, I don't hate him. I just think it's justice for him to lose his hair.

If you want to see the most hate go to a Trump rally. Here, check this out:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/richard-spencer-speech-npi/508379/

I guess that for you nothing says "I love you" like a NAZI salute, right?

 

[Guzam]

If you want to see the most hate go to a Trump rally.

Last I heard they're doing NAZI salutes.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/richard-spencer-speech-npi/508379/

Richard spencer is in no way linked with Trump. Fascists liked Gandhi. I don't think Gandhi liked Fascists.

What I see is YOUR hate, though. Right here, right now, on a hair loss talk forum, wishing baldness to a fellow, grieving and helpless balding man just because he has different ideas. To me this thing it's way worse than a nazi salute. I perfectly tolerate Rick89 and his other accounts even if he hates Jews. Your vitriolic hate makes me real sad. Why are you so damn hateful

 

[Guzam]

I have actually avoided getting serious with one of the women at my gym based on this reason alone. However, i wouldn't mind a slip n slide with her.


She is a 5'0 midget with small bones, and tiny muscles.


I would create push over twinks with her.


I need a thick women to offset my beta genes, preferably with thick hair.

My top marriage priority is a full-head, not manlet father-in-law. Way more important than anything else.

 

[nameless]

Richard spencer is in no way linked with Trump. Fascists liked Gandhi. I don't think Gandhi liked Fascists.

What I see is YOUR hate, though. Right here, right now, on a hair loss talk forum, wishing baldness to a fellow, grieving and helpless balding man just because he has different ideas. To me this thing it's way worse than a nazi salute. I perfectly tolerate Rick89 and his other accounts even if he hates Jews. Your vitriolic hate makes me real sad. Why are you so damn hateful

I don't feel anything for him. You're assuming I have a bunch of negative feelings for/about him but I don't. I don't feel anything for him.

For me it's all intellectual and it's real simple. Stay with me:

1. Hair loss hurts because the victim stops being ACCEPTED by others

2. So the issue in hair loss is ACCEPTANCE.

3. The extremist conservatives want to exclude minorities and keeping women down.

4. In other words, the extremist conservatives want to deny ACCEPTANCE to minorities and women.

5. And in my view, those who would deny acceptance to others deserve it not for themselves.

6. So you see my point is not an emotional/feeling situation at all. It's purely intellectual.

7. And by the way, I got this line of thinking from a moderate conservative republican named Abraham Lincoln.

Mr. Lincoln said, "Those who would deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves".

Whenever I get into a situation where I want to evaluate justice I think back on what Abraham Lincoln said to determine if there is a parallel that can be drawn between the situation I'm examining and Abraham Lincoln's words. I think there is a valid parallel between extremist conservatives denying acceptance to other people a and those same extreme conservatives losing their own acceptance due to their hair loss.

If some guy is out in this world seeking to deny acceptance to others and something happens to him that causes him to lose his own acceptance that is justice.

What is wrong with my point? if my point doesn't work please tell me why. I'm willing to consider the possibility that my point could be wrong but you should come up with something good because I have a very good point.

 

[nameless]

You're right. It's 1:30 in the morning. I'm tired and I'm going to bed. I'll probably regret this sh*t when I wake up tomorrow.

 

[Guzam]

It may sound like hate but I do not hate him. I don't feel anything for him. And I don't hate anybody.

You're imagining/assuming me having a bunch of negative feelings for/about him inside of me. But I don't. I don't feel anything for him at all.

For me it's all intellectual and it's real simple. Stay with me:

1. Hair loss hurts because the victim stops being ACCEPTED by others, especially the opposite sex.

2. In other words, the issue in hair loss is ACCEPTANCE.

3. The extremist conservatives agenda includes excluding minorities and keeping women down.

4. In other words, the extremist conservative agenda is to limit ACCEPTANCE to women and deny ACCEPTANCE to minorities.

5. So you see my point is not an emotional/feeling situation at all. It's purely intellectual.

6. In my view, those who would deny acceptance to others deserve it not for themselves.

7. And by the way, I got this line of thinking from a conservative republican named Abraham Lincoln. He wasn't an extremist though.

Abraham Lincoln said, "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves".

Whenever I get into a situation where I want to evaluate justice I think back on what Abraham Lincoln said to determine if there is a parallel that can be drawn between the situation I'm examining and Abraham Lincoln's words.

I think I have a valid point. Here is my point:

If some guy is out in this world seeking to deny acceptance to others then if something happens to him that causes him to lose acceptance that is justice.

What is wrong with this point of mine? if my point is wrong please tell me why. I'm willing to consider the possibility that my point could be wrong but you better come up with something good because I think I have a very good point.

Your point is valid (valid does not mean right because being right is relative) but it is inhumane and heartless. You put politics above hair loss, which is a life-destroying issue. No one deserves disfigurement, not even the most wicked nazi out there. Wishing death is way more tasteful and honorable.

Appealing to 'justice' is a fallacy because that's not you who decides what justice is. You're not superior nor the carrier of justice, you're just bitter and very very hateful. You try to rationalize your hate with this 'justice' rhetoric but it's easy to see hate flowing through your post. Be honest.