SoThatsLife said:Still no answers goata?
They seem to have a very on/off effectiveness on their email response.
Nope...I've sent the email again.
SoThatsLife said:Still no answers goata?
They seem to have a very on/off effectiveness on their email response.
SoThatsLife said:Androscience ain't exactly know to be the best updater's on their web page, usually a couple times a year. But yes, it seems a little dark now.
SoThatsLife said:I just received an mail from androscience, and they was awaiting updates and hoped that it was coming soon.
I don't really know how these trials works, I thought androscience was doing the trials them self?
el_duterino said:be patient !..they are going to update the info on their homepage in summer of 2008.
don't be too sure about that.CCS said:el_duterino said:be patient !..they are going to update the info on their homepage in summer of 2008.
You poking fun or is that a typo?
I hope I keep my hair long enough for that to come out. Once it is out, then I know I'm safe.
el_duterino said:was anyone able to try Cayman medical powder ? maybe worth a try if we cannot wait for the 3-4 years before the final foam gets approved
el_duterino said:ASC-j9 does inhibit (destroy ?) the AR, but so does BP-766:
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6828458/fulltext.html
this BP-766 is known as Fluridil now. I was wondering what would be the difference between those 2 drugs in the way they work, since they seem to serve the same purpose.
Perhaps this fluridil is even more powerful than ASC-j9.
Any thoughts ?
DavisNY said:anything ever happen with this?