- Reaction score
- 1,332
@That Guy,
Yes if they overcome these culturing issues I think it's game over for Androgenetic Alopecia.
I can understand the skeptics who say that this is a mouse model, and that a mouse model doesn't translate too humans, but this isn't entirely true in the context of Tsuji et al.
Remember that observations in humans actually tell us that the hair follicle can regenerate. In fact it has been confirmed in some studies that when a hair follicle is split (horizontal cut between DP and bulge) it can regenerate and actually often does regenerate.
Then we also got that Frankenstein experiment of Dr. Jahoda, who took his own hair follicle, took out the dermal sheath, and transplanted it into his wife his forearm.
a–d, Punch biopsies were taken from male scalp skin (a) and the hair-follicle end bulbs amputated (b), everted (c) and the exposed epidermal components scraped away and discarded (d). e, The dermal sheath and dermal papillae were separated, cleaned and pooled separately in culture medium. f, Up to 11 pieces of dermal sheath were combined and implanted into small, shallow wounds on the inner forearm. g, Induced fibres were distinct and often pigmented.
What happened there? Well after these dermal sheath cells were delivered to his wife forearm they induced brand new hair follicles. The funny thing is when they looked at those brand new induced hair follicles and performed DNA analysis they found out that the bottom part was from Jahoda and the upper part from his own wife. Apparently the cells from Jahoda set in a motion of mesenchymal-epithelial interaction which led to brand new hair follicles. The cells of Jahoda and ultimately the brand new induced hair follicles weren't even rejected.
Anyway this does show that the hair follicle is just very flexible as an organ and more importantly several types of (stem)cells in the hair follicle show regenerative potential to induce a brand new hair follicle.
This all leads me to think that this will be the "cure" for almost everyone, based on these simple observations, not in mice, but in actual humans.
Yes if they overcome these culturing issues I think it's game over for Androgenetic Alopecia.
I can understand the skeptics who say that this is a mouse model, and that a mouse model doesn't translate too humans, but this isn't entirely true in the context of Tsuji et al.
Remember that observations in humans actually tell us that the hair follicle can regenerate. In fact it has been confirmed in some studies that when a hair follicle is split (horizontal cut between DP and bulge) it can regenerate and actually often does regenerate.
Then we also got that Frankenstein experiment of Dr. Jahoda, who took his own hair follicle, took out the dermal sheath, and transplanted it into his wife his forearm.
a–d, Punch biopsies were taken from male scalp skin (a) and the hair-follicle end bulbs amputated (b), everted (c) and the exposed epidermal components scraped away and discarded (d). e, The dermal sheath and dermal papillae were separated, cleaned and pooled separately in culture medium. f, Up to 11 pieces of dermal sheath were combined and implanted into small, shallow wounds on the inner forearm. g, Induced fibres were distinct and often pigmented.
What happened there? Well after these dermal sheath cells were delivered to his wife forearm they induced brand new hair follicles. The funny thing is when they looked at those brand new induced hair follicles and performed DNA analysis they found out that the bottom part was from Jahoda and the upper part from his own wife. Apparently the cells from Jahoda set in a motion of mesenchymal-epithelial interaction which led to brand new hair follicles. The cells of Jahoda and ultimately the brand new induced hair follicles weren't even rejected.
Anyway this does show that the hair follicle is just very flexible as an organ and more importantly several types of (stem)cells in the hair follicle show regenerative potential to induce a brand new hair follicle.
This all leads me to think that this will be the "cure" for almost everyone, based on these simple observations, not in mice, but in actual humans.
Last edited: