First off, I disagree with the part about Spencer Kobren. I do believe him to be a good and sincere person who does a lot to bring to light the plight of hair loss sufferers and trying to get the media to see hair loss as a devastating condition rather than comedic fodder.
But I've always thought that a lot of the hair transplant surgeons tried to do their best to lambast the field of hair multiplication. When asked about the prospect of HM, they almost always give ridiculously long timelines of when it be available to the public and are always quick to point out the hurdles and drawbacks associated with HM. And despite the fact that hair transplantation is really only a very niche market (only a small scintilla of hair loss sufferers even get hair transplants), these hair transplant surgeons never seem to make any effort towards innovation at all (unless it is another form of a hair transplant). IMO, they do this because hair transplantation generates massive amounts of money for them and HM would make their cash cow procedures obsolete. Nobody wants to lose money, especially the very large amounts that they are making. If a real form of HM became available, or even a superior treatment to the inferior options that we have today, it would put a massive dent in their profit margins.
Don't be so naive. He has a forum where he removes people who make threads about crowd funding. So any thread that actually has a chance to make a real difference, he removes.
He has so much fame in the hair loss industry. He is ideal for a crowdfunding project. But of course, that would be bad for business in the long run.