Nah, I closed my mailchimp account when I saw the low number of people willing to actually do something. Back then the biggest objection people gave was to who would we give the money to. Now that we could focus exclusively on Lauster's team, I'm guessing it could play better.
Still, there is but a handful of people here willing to actually contribute. Even the real scientists in this forum with actual degrees would rather spend countless hours disecting rat studies and trying to see if they can find the "missing link". And for what...? What good will come of it having intelligent discussions about DHT, growth factors and water fall effects of the root cause? I'll tell you what, nothing... Its just another way of coping with hair loss, venting. Because they should know that even if they do find some "hidden gem", maybe something the researchers overlooked, it will be for nothing. They're not going to contact Lauster, Cotsaralis, Garza or any of the other hair loss researchers anyways. So the way I see it, they're wasting their time just like everyone else here. Even if they don't care to admit it. Is this not true...? Or do you actually enjoy coming here, correcting the ignorant members who can't seem to understand the scientific process and the actual complexity of working in the field of science?
I have been here long enough to know they are very smart people. Why not lend us a hand writing the content for the website? You know your knowledge would be accurate and should be easier to digest by Lauster's team. I wish I could do it myself, I really do, I would do it today if I could. However, that is not a gift I have. So, Benj and any of the other scientists care to participate in something that can actually make an impact? Or do you want this forum to go back to the old days? The good old days where a new rat study would point to another piece of the puzzle?
Anyways, that's all I have to say. Maybe this comment will just get overlooked like every of the other ones actually worth while.