What Is The Best Line Ever At Hair Loss Talk?

[cocohot]

Seems like you guys are forgetting that alot of these girls bodies will deteriorate even if she doesn't have kids when she gets older.

Yeah but it can come 15 years early. Science needs to fix this.

 

[hairblues]

Seems like you guys are forgetting that alot of these girls bodies will deteriorate even if she doesn't have kids when she gets older.

can't stop father time.

You can slow it down but you can't stop it.

Good genetics plays a huge role in how well you age or don't age and then lifestyle.

 

[hairblues]

Seems like you guys are forgetting that alot of these girls bodies will deteriorate even if she doesn't have kids when she gets older.

and to be honest?
i don't know everyone age but men as they age at least most men they are not as critical of women as when young. Because they are aging themselves.
Some do want younger and are youth obsessed
this is not actually the norm this is more a fantasy ideal.
Most men as they age are just happy with women they deem attractive and sexy who are light hearted.
HOW sexy etc is not as significant.

 

[cocohot]

What do you mean exactly?

At 25 a typical young woman can walk up to any man and offer to quickly have sex nearby and 99% of the time a single man of any age would say yes.
Some women of that age load up on the morning after pill and have sex with literally hundreds of men.

At 35+ there is a dramatic change and by 45 it's nearly over. It must be disorientating.

 

[hairblues]

At 25 a typical young woman can walk up to any man and offer to quickly have sex nearby and 99% of the time a single man of any age would say yes.
Some women of that age load up on the morning after pill and have sex with literally hundreds of men.

At 35+ there is a dramatic change and by 45 it's nearly over. It must be disorientating.

LOL this was funny.

 

[cocohot]

LOL this was funny.

Can't men be honest about this just as women are honest about height and baldness? It's nature we should be angry at, not each other.

 

[EvilLocks]

Among all the women I had sex with this year, only one admitted that by the age of 25, it was the beginning of the end for women.

She was extremely cynical and genuinely sounded depressed. So I understand the coping.

It's true. I'm one year away from the beginning of the end, better act fast. NOW WHO WANTS TO DATE ME?! I'd marry anyone right now, just say yes please? I promise I will never get fat.

 

[hairblues]

Can't men be honest about this just as women are honest about height and baldness? It's nature we should be angry at, not each other.

Im not angry i just think you are funny.

 

[cocohot]

It depends on what the woman sees in the mirror.

At a point (it can be at 25, 30, 40) there will be too much wrinkles, too much deterioration, and a big drop of the attention they're getting.

At a point they have to face the truth, that's when the panic mode is activated and they ditch all their contraceptive to get knocked up by the first high-status beta they can trap.



Cope.

To be honest, I would do exactly the same thing in their position, wouldn't you?

 

[tellersquill]

@cocohot See? From experience and having had many conversation with women approaching the wall, I can tell you, they're not even aware of it.

The 38 year old woman I was talking to yesterday, she thought that she still had the same chances than 15 years ago.

Women cope hard about hitting the wall, many of them don't want to face the truth.

Among all the women I had sex with this year, only one admitted that by the age of 25, it was the beginning of the end for women.

She was extremely cynical and genuinely sounded depressed. So I understand the coping.

I think this is true.

A lot of women deny that most women are past their best looks wise at 25.

The exception is truly beautiful women - which most women are not.

 

[tellersquill]

It angers me to read some of the bullshit flying around on this thread, especially from @FredTheBelgian , whose arrogance, hypocrisy and short-sightedness is unusually breath-taking today, even for him. Fred, 99 times out of 100 women DO find their bodies irreparably damaged by childbirth, that's a goddam fact. But whatever, the burden of proof's on you my friend so go on, put those A+ googling skills of yours to good work and dig up some solid, concrete evidence that looking worse than you used to post-pregnancy is 100% voluntary. No Daily Mail or Huffington Post articles though - neither of those papers are even remotely reliable sources of information, the Mail in particular is especially dubious. I'd also like to see you justify bringing another kid into a world which has Donald J Trump as it's leader, a world in which terrorist sects run rampant, some staggeringly high proportion of its population is either chronically depressed, languishing in poverty or both, a world in which every baby born (within the next couple of centuries at least) is ultimately fated to grow old, suffer and die. How do you justify the damage your child will do to the environment, the animals they'll (indirectly) butcher, the people they'll hurt? And what about their own suffering? You yourself love to wax lyrical about all your supposed battles with depression, hair loss, neurosis etc. All that sh*t's genetic! A billion and one terrible things could happen to this potential child of yours and you can't protect them against any of them. And anyway, what right do you have to impose life on future person who cannot (and quite probably would not, if possible) consent to it? What you're proposing - pumping out as many babies as your girlfriend's loose pussy can muster - is IMMORAL. I'm happy to provide some more complicated, philosophical arguments in support of my opinion if needed, but for the moment I don't want to risk confusing you, so I've tried to keep things simple. Please answer all of my questions and no 'ad hominem's please. DBW.

Haha I love this. So glad everyone is back to arguing - I hate it when everyone gets along!

 

[IggyPop]

Appart from that, I look pretty young.

Yeah, that´s what most women think

 

[cocohot]

I think this is true.

A lot of women deny that most women are past their best looks wise at 25.

The exception is truly beautiful women - which most women are not.

I would say it varies, more like somewhere between 25 and 35 or even 40, there are some women who make it all the way to 50 but that's very unusual. Lisa Snowden in the UK is in her mid 40's and she looks as good as any 25 year old.

 

[hairblues]

It depends on what the woman sees in the mirror.

At a point (it can be at 25, 30, 40) there will be too much wrinkles, too much deterioration, and a big drop of the attention they're getting.

At a point they have to face the truth, that's when the panic mode is activated and they ditch all their contraceptive to get knocked up by the first high-status beta they can trap.



Cope.

I don't even have wrinkles yet.

Am i as pretty as when i was 25? No of course not

It would only be a cope if i was interested in dating 25- 35 year old

Im not inters test in that age group.

 

[cocohot]

That I don't understand though. Some young girls are really not looking good. Some 40+ are hot. You can't base your desire only on age... But I am no a man, I probably don't fonction like you

I agree, but those are mostly exceptions. I would say that in France where you're from women stay good looking way longer than in the UK because they don't get fat. I've been on holidays there and I would say the average woman is 3/10 more attractive than UK women, and stays good looking about 15 years longer. UK women (and men) are all obese by 35. It's a huge problem.

 

[hairblues]

I'll make what?? I am not talking about marriage. For now, I could have enough men I want. Does'nt mean I am gonna take it for granted and not gonna settle. I am not stupid !

The "ill make it' is based on the theory all women are holding out for a perfect prince charming to give them completeness and a family with a house with a picket fence blah blah blah.

I have said many times if i had wanted those things i would have lived my life very different then how i lived it

i also think they have some misplaced animosity.

Young women who are in prime are rejecting them or have rejected them--so there cope is the idea that women hit a wall by 25-30 and all the rejection is going to leave them alone and living with cats because no man will want them beyond f*****g.

so instead of being bitter towards women in their prime who are the ones actually rejecting them they are bitter towards the older women who they deem as older versions of the younger women rejecting them.

its misplaced bitterness and animosity.

 

[cocohot]

The "ill make it' is based on the theory all women are holding out for a perfect prince charming to give them completeness and a family with a house with a picket fence blah blah blah.

I have said many times if i had wanted those things i would have lived my life very different then how i lived it

i also think they have some misplaced animosity.

Young women who are in prime are rejecting them or have rejected them--so there cope is the idea that women hit a wall by 25-30 and all the rejection is going to leave them alone and living with cats because no man will want them beyond f*****g.

so instead of being bitter towards women in their prime who are the ones actually rejecting them they are bitter towards the older women who they deem as older versions of the younger women rejecting them.

its misplaced bitterness and animosity.

The only thing I'm bitter about is my NW5 head. I asked those questions because I wonder about the answer. It must just be so crazy for women how dramatically their lives keep changing, seeing the changes in their bodies as they have kids, the difference in how they're treated at different ages etc. No wonder women are so crazy.

 

[hairblues]

The only thing I'm bitter about is my NW5 head. I asked those questions because I wonder about the answer. It must just be so crazy for women how dramatically their lives keep changing, seeing the changes in their bodies as they have kids, the difference in how they're treated at different ages etc. No wonder women are so crazy.

I am not treated differently at least not yet.

Only time i was treated differently---and it was mostly by women--was when i was over weight...I was depressed about some losses i suffered and was in a grieving mode so i was not watching what i ate and was not working out i got heavy and when i snapped out of my funk i realized it--and i noticed other women treated me poorly...i still got hit on by men because it was mostly my tits and hips and *** that got big so i was still hourglass but i was so uncomfortable and i shed that weight as fast as i could in a healthy way.

Its only on this forum do i see so much agism--which just may be because you guys are young so over 40 seems old to you because it is old to you...but i am not out trying to f*** 20 and 30 year olds.

But its kind of ridiculous that you are telling Pas who is 28 that shes going to hit a wall..lol i mean what is going to happen? she won't attract younger men? who cares shes already said she likes dating a little older as did Evil.

 

[pjhair]

It angers me to read some of the bullshit flying around on this thread, especially from @FredTheBelgian , whose arrogance, hypocrisy and short-sightedness is unusually breath-taking today, even for him. Fred, 99 times out of 100 women DO find their bodies irreparably damaged by childbirth, that's a goddam fact. But whatever, the burden of proof's on you my friend so go on, put those A+ googling skills of yours to good work and dig up some solid, concrete evidence that looking worse than you used to post-pregnancy is 100% voluntary. No Daily Mail or Huffington Post articles though - neither of those papers are even remotely reliable sources of information, the Mail in particular is especially dubious. I'd also like to see you justify bringing another kid into a world which has Donald J Trump as it's leader, a world in which terrorist sects run rampant, some staggeringly high proportion of its population is either chronically depressed, languishing in poverty or both, a world in which every baby born (within the next couple of centuries at least) is ultimately fated to grow old, suffer and die. How do you justify the damage your child will do to the environment, the animals they'll (indirectly) butcher, the people they'll hurt? And what about their own suffering? You yourself love to wax lyrical about all your supposed battles with depression, hair loss, neurosis etc. All that sh*t's genetic! A billion and one terrible things could happen to this potential child of yours and you can't protect them against any of them. And anyway, what right do you have to impose life on future person who cannot (and quite probably would not, if possible) consent to it? What you're proposing - pumping out as many babies as your girlfriend's loose pussy can handle - is IMMORAL. I'm happy to provide some more complicated, philosophical arguments in support of my opinion if needed, but for the moment I don't want to risk confusing you, so I've tried to keep things simple. Please answer all of my questions and no 'ad hominem's please. DBW.

I currently hold no position on the issue of having kids but are you basically saying that having kids is immoral because:

(a) They will eventually cause damage to the environment and suffering to other animals
(b) Babies can't consent to being born and having a life imposed upon them in this miserable world

Will that be a correct assessment of your argument?

 

[cocohot]

But you are particularly good looking, though, @hairblues. Most women won't be treated the same, and the amount of pressure that is on us, ladies, is "umberable"

This is true and it's also true that the pressure on men is insane too.

Life for everyone on this forum is like playing a videogame on the maximum difficulty mode.