What's funny is that he never said you were a KKK member, now you're putting ad-hominem words about yourself in his mouth
He didn't but other people on here suggested that I must be a skinhead/KKK member.
What's funny is that he never said you were a KKK member, now you're putting ad-hominem words about yourself in his mouth
Oh just because I am explaining my interpretation of your modifier now makes me a liberal. Almost everyone in this thread interpreted your modifier as anti-Semitic. I don't see anyone defending you or your modifier. Anyway, I don't have anything against you even if you can't stand me. I am just giving my interpretation of what I read from the original title. And I was not the first person who pointed it out.You're obviously one of those liberal types that I can't stand so rather than aggravate myself and argue with you, I'll just let you continue to put words in my mouth. It's just funny how if anyone even dares mention the word Jew in today's era of pc ridiculousness in a way that doesn't kiss up to them, they/I must be an anti-Semitic KKK member.
He didn't but other people on here suggested that I must be a skinhead/KKK member.
You explained it even better. Nice job.I haven't read this thread too thoroughly but let me explain the problem here, assuming you genuinely don't understand.
Context is a thing, and certain words used in different context's imply negative stereotypes. By asking a negative question about the organisation of an industry and including the phrase "Jew-run" you imply the renowned anti-semitic connotation that there is some intentional conspiracy from Jews, and if you don't know about this renowned anti-semitic connotation, you've been living under a rock and are simply ignorant, rather than racist.
But it must be one or the other here, either way I don't know how you can be so brazen about it. To me at least, there's nothing wrong with saying "Jews run Hollywood", and if you know the history of why this is, there's perfectly good reasons for it, but by saying "why's (negative implication) happening by Jew run Hollywood?" the context changes completely.
The main thing to remember is, as mentioned before straight away, it was completely un-necessary to mention "Jew run" in the first place, it had no relevance whatsoever, and you can claim innocence at simply saying "I just asked about Hollywood which happens to be Jew run!" but not even someone as equally stupid as yourself would believe that.
Thanks, the start of your explanation was completely the same idea but you went further into how he may be one of these "Jew's run everything" conspiracy nuts, also a road I was tempted to go down.
All I said is that it's mostly Jews who control Hollywood and the media and you guys twist it around as if I'm saying that "Jews run everything" which I'm not. Since I'm part German it's like that automatically makes me innately evil to your kind. Here's are 2 articles that back my point:Thanks, the start of your explanation was completely the same idea but you went further into how he may be one of these "Jew's run everything" conspiracy nuts, also a road I was tempted to go down.
I haven't read this thread too thoroughly but let me explain the problem here, assuming you genuinely don't understand.
Context is a thing, and certain words used in different context's imply negative stereotypes. By asking a negative question about the organisation of an industry and including the phrase "Jew-run" you imply the renowned anti-semitic connotation that there is some intentional conspiracy from Jews, and if you don't know about this renowned anti-semitic connotation, you've been living under a rock and are simply ignorant, rather than racist.
But it must be one or the other here, either way I don't know how you can be so brazen about it. To me at least, there's nothing wrong with saying "Jews run Hollywood", and if you know the history of why this is, there's perfectly good reasons for it, but by saying "why's (negative implication) happening by Jew run Hollywood?" the context changes completely.
The main thing to remember is, as mentioned before straight away, it was completely un-necessary to mention "Jew run" in the first place, it had no relevance whatsoever, and you can claim innocence at simply saying "I just asked about Hollywood which happens to be Jew run!" but not even someone as equally stupid as yourself would believe that.
Why did you just avoid the post that summed everything up perfectly? I even admitted that a lot of Jewish people do run media and Hollywood, and then you think it's necessary to post an article about it? You replied to the post where I said specifically what argument I SHOULDN'T use in this instance, and you replied to that argument, and avoided the other post.
Reply to this:
I thought you would have liked watching 2 rich guys piss LOLOLOL idk.
**** off.
Rock on.
90% of this forum (especially Impact) is all a load of balls about people arguing, why not go over to the other thread where they're talking about whether someone's a psychotic pervert and needs to go to a shrink. I mean if this was the Success Stories or Alternative Treatment forum then fine, but I don't see why you're getting a sandy vagina over this.
Now you've derailed it he can properly ignore my post so thanks for that, now go un-twist your knickers.
That's big of you, no problem.
This place is a cesspool and that's why we love it.
On the contrary, I think Hollywood mostly portrays bald men as badass! There's Vin Diesel, Jason Statham, Saitama. Oh wait...