Would You Rather Win $100m On The Lottery Or All Your Hair To Grow Back?
- Thread starter Calum
- Start date
Lol you believe in fairy tails love stories ? Nop not all women interested in financial security are hookers, you're not paying your wife/girlfriend to have sexe with you. the "looks above money" is just a scam invented by broke ugly fucks who can't attract women cause they have neither of them.
I say good luck to any man providing for his women and keeping her by selling wigs made from his nw0 hairline. Cause that's basically what you're saying. why have a private jet when you can simply fly eco and be happy with your hair lol ?
Last edited:
So when you goin' full MGTOW?
No, I believe that love between people grows over time and it starts from mutual sexual attraction. You know, like real human relationships.
We're not talking about "financial security". We're talking about having shitloads of money to literally buy women's "affections"
No, you have that incorrect.
The money above looks is just a scam invented by broke ugly fucks who can't attract women because they have neither money nor looks. OR, they have money and have deluded themselves into thinking that their "trophy wife" way outta their league actually has any honest feelings for them.
What I'm saying, is that when and if you ever grow up, you will realize that — and I know this is terrifying to you...women have their own sexual desires. Scarier still, is that the underpinnings for these desires are no different than yours, they just have the sexes swapped.
and scariest of all, that means that you cannot control her sexual desires or lack thereof towards you.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 850
HAir. I would rather be poor and have the ABILITY TO ENJOY LIFE than be rich and WHOLLY INCAPABLE OF EXPERIENCING HAPPINESS.
And you think hair can prevent that from happening ?
What you need tu understand is when you’re looking fir just playing arround and sleep with good looking women money is more than enough for that. If you’re looking for a serious relationship with above average women (which by the way makes you lile every other shallow person on this earth) then the ability to provide for her an above average life is what’s going to make you keep her. There is no f*****g love it just dies with time no matter how good looking you are.
There is only proof of love, and that is money and the person who you are for your s.o.
Many men cheat on their attractive wifes but at the end of the day they don’t want to lose her so they come back. Same goes for cheating wifes they cheat with good looking fuckboyz and they come back to their husbands. Ask yourself why ? This is real life not a movie turning down 100mil for having hair lol how delusional you must be to say so. We wouldn’t have any bald rich men if hair was that important as they all can afford a personnal hairdresser to put on a new wig for every single f*****g day without bothering. I get your point hair is important but not that important. Holly sh*t i’m draging myself to a sh*t toxic forum Need to gtfo right now
- Reaction score
- 15
43 here. I'm not as bothered by my hair loss as I used to be. I don't like it but it's manageable. With that kind of money you could do whatever you want, every day for the rest of your life. I'd take the money in a heart beat.
- Reaction score
- 11,939
I appreciate the fact that you're speaking truth, and that you're reminding people that women are human beings just like men. Among good company, that wouldn't need to be stated, but it's necessary here.
That said, the example of this thread is so absurd (100 million?) that I think that most would do better with the money than with hair. It's not the money itself that would be attractive to good women, but the opportunity that it buys. Looks maxing would be utterly trivial and easy with that kind of money, for most of us. Life stress would be reduced, you'd be able to make more interesting decisions.
You can also plan brilliant first dates. A lot of women don't give me or you or whoever the time of day because they have fifty options. If you can offer a brilliant date, they might. Hairblues had once given the example of one of her friends who went out with a guy that she wasn't interested in. If the guy had been a bloke it would have gone nowhere. The guy offered to take her to Paris (I think that it was Paris) for the weekend, they went, and are together fifteen years later.
It's also the case that lack of money can kill relationships long-term. It's not just that it helps to be to travel together, it's also that bills become a pain in the *** once children are on the scene. Day care, babysitting, child health care, schooling, etc, are all ridiculously expensive. Further, our generation will likely need to save ~$250,000+/child to send them to university, as older generations have drained the country's wealth. If your child isn't being adequately cared for, it's likely to break your relationship. Further, housing prices go up by ~10% every year due to myriad government interventions, which means that it's harder for us to buy into the middle class.
- Reaction score
- 11,939
With the 100 million dollars, I'd definitely get a hair transplant, a nose job, laser eye surgery. I would check into a water-only fasting clinic for 2 to 3 weeks like the True North Medical centre for help with motivation, and then hire the best personal trainers and eat better food. I'd get the hearing aid that my social skills would benefit from. I'd also not announce my money to anybody, in order to steer clear of opportunists and parasites. Only one or two lawyers would find out how much money I have, hopefully nobody else.
However, if I was offered something more meaningful than a full head of hair, which I think people here overrate, such as 9+/10 total appearance, say being an analogue to Chris Pine (who has a NW2), I'd take that over 100 million.
However, if I was offered something more meaningful than a full head of hair, which I think people here overrate, such as 9+/10 total appearance, say being an analogue to Chris Pine (who has a NW2), I'd take that over 100 million.
DoctorHouse
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,725
I seriously would help some of you guys out on here if I won a hundred million. Since you are one of my favorite posters on here @Afro_Vacancy, you would be one of my top priorities. I think its so weird still today that I actually at one time knew currently one of the richest men in the world and how differently my life would have been if I would have maintained a great friendship with him.
I don't doubt you'd help out some of your friends on H.L.T., DH. Your altruism is conveyed in many of your posts. Afro is one of my favorites here too and a true friend. Did the rich guy become wealthy before or after you lost contact?
- Reaction score
- 2
Didn't specifically say that in the title as I thought it was just implied. Common sense really. It was only 1 or 2 out of about 30 that got the wrong end of the stick anyway so my question seems fine x
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 497
not everyone has a good donor area ...
and you know this because you have a lot of money and flaunt it, and so you get with hot women on the reg, right? If so, enjoy your vacuous "relationship". So again, tell me why zuckerberg isn't married to a bombshell? Why has Trump been divorced so many times? How many sideboys do you think Melania has?
It's like buying KISS brand air guitar strings. Yeah, the packaging might look cool and your friends will find it amusing, but there's nothing inside for you.
You keep speaking as if I ever said that financial stability isn't important maintaining a relationship.
My entire point here is that rich men who have "trophy wives", women who are with them purely because of money, are men who are voluntarily participants in a parasitic, vacuous relationship. You might be okay with being an abused beta male just because it means you get to show off what Fred (I think) calls a "Facebook official" relationship. Most of us normal people aren't so foolish.
This type of MGTOW rhetoric is spouted by one kind of person and your belief in it tells anyone all we need to know.
The reason you believe this, is because IRL you are too much of a bitter, materialistic a**h** to have ever experienced it or you got burned by some girl years ago and can't move on. You view women as nothing more than c*** sockets, an achievement, and bragging rights and one that can be purchased at that. This is just painfully obvious reading your posts.
One's place in the "sexual market place" is determined by sexual characteristics. It sucks, but you'll just have to deal with it.
No, I'm vain — not a greedy f***.
You don't get my point.
- Reaction score
- 1,052
well this has always been a false idea. ALL people with typical norwood patterns have 4500/5000 donor area at worst(norwood 7) =arround 5cm wide donor area= norwood 7 zone. why people have more or less? that's because people have different hair caracteristics: thinner hairs for exemples. but the thing to keep in mind is that you will always need a certain percentage of the initial density to have coverage: SO people with higher density in donor area(better donor area) will need higher density to be transplanted. You see what I mean? there are no winners.
if you say not everyone is good candidate I would agree but it all depends on expectations...the most important thing is to choose the best surgeons who know the job and who can refuse people. then you have people with dupa, retrograde alopecia or thinning in donor area, they are complicated cases unfortunately but they are a lower pourcentage of cases
Uhum Why attractive couples don't stay together and do the same then? Angelina jolie, Jennifer aniston, brad pitt, Johny depp etc... ?
You think that mark zuckerberg or bill gates have failed by not marrying attractive women ? please socialise more or get a gratfying job twhere you actually get to meet different people, life is not hollywood, doesn't work like you say. Have you ever had some attractive female friends or guys in general ?? why do you put looks in such a high esteem ?
- Reaction score
- 11,939
I think that was the one who brought up the term "facebook official" to describe such relationships, perhaps we both did it independently.
Here's giga-chad Steven Mnuchin posing with his wife, Louise Linton, who loves him because of his raw masculine power:
This is them getting off an airplane:
Steven Mnuchin is the secretary of the US treasury under President Trump. Prior to that he held a variety of jobs, for example he was an executive producer to Suicide Squad, a cultural milestone for our civilization.
- Reaction score
- 11,939
There are most definitely winners and losers in the hair transplant game.
The talk about density is mostly defeatist loser talk, people looking for excuses. Though density matters, it is much, *much* less important than coverage. People who have a great donor area need never worry about coverage which is the first variable. Having a hairline drop to NW2 or better means that nobody will think of you as bald, and you can look like you have pristine hair in either photographs or by growing longer hair.
Meanwhile, the additional factors are money, native hair, and treatments. The more money you have, and the more your native hair is responsive to treatments in a manner which is relatively free of side effects, the better off you'll be.