armandein said:"the hair on the sides of the head are still able to grow because there is plenty of blood supply to this area"
I thonk that hat's theory of hair loss is totally wrong.
Armando
misterE said:I'm not suggesting that hair loss is caused by hats, I'm saying that there is a lot more blood available to the sides of the head compared to the top.
dpdr said:Dr Rassman ( :whistle: ) talking about S.H.B.G
http://www.baldingblog.com/2010/01/18/s ... hair-loss/
misterE said:Anyway I'm gunna answer your question with a question of my own, maybe you can help; doesn't the hair from the transplanted area, when moved to the top, doesn't it thin over time? I've always heard that hair transplants do infact thin out once again as time goes on.
Bryan said:Oh, maybe a little, but over really extended periods of time, like DECADES, not just a year or two. It's probably just a general part of the aging process.
Bryan said:Furthmore, balding hair follicles, when transplanted to non-balding areas of the body, continue their normal pattern of balding, just the same as they did when they were on top of the scalp. How do you explain that?
Gotta defend ol' Rassman here..he's conservative about these things cos he runs a site and could run into legal difficulties telling people to dive into treatments that have no solid proof behind them. Also, he's not idiot enough to fall for "My cousin does x and has a full head of hair therefore x it what we all should be doing" type of typical internet opinion.monty1978 said:I aggree totally. Rassman has a chip in the bigger game, no doubt whatsoever!
monty1978 said:he does indeed come accross as a genuine bloke.
None because Finasteride and minoxidil are the only FDA approved ones. Maybe privately he might recommend stuff but he's responsible enough not to publish it on his site.monty1978 said:Could you let me know of any products he has advocated that aren't propecia or minoxidil please. I would like to be proven wrong he does indeed come accross as a genuine bloke.
misterE said:Bryan said:Furthmore, balding hair follicles, when transplanted to non-balding areas of the body, continue their normal pattern of balding, just the same as they did when they were on top of the scalp. How do you explain that?
Never heard of that.
misterE said:But my guess would be there is high levels of either S.H.B.G. bound estradiol (which acts like D.H.T.) or just S.H.B.G. bound D.H.T. attached to the S.H.B.G. receptor which is destroying that follicle.
misterE said:I could have swore that you posted a study showing that transplanted hair follicles from the head onto the arm didn't thin...I'll try to find that for everyone.
misterE said:I found it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone take a look at this.
http://www.hairlosshelp.com/forums/mess ... &forumid=1
Bryan said:Uhhh....that has to do with transplanting human hair follicles onto IMMUNE-DEFICIENT MICE, dumbbell.
Bryan said:Explain THAT with your "SHBG" silliness, Sherlock.