- Reaction score
- 4,891
Agreed, but in defence of my dislikes everyone knows my stance, and I doubt I have to explain my theories again.I accidentally posted that early.
Also I will get one argument out of the way that I know someone will mention, the "looks can screw up attraction" point has been considered redundant by many, and I can see why.
I've seen That Guy, Polar bear, many others write about this- only looks can attract women, but personality can only screw it up, not attract.
Basically the idea being that "game" won't get you anywhere, you can only f*** up what's on a plate.
Ive thought about this a lot and still don't know what to think but that is the argument to refute what hairblues was writing, and someone else I believe.
Also I agree with the sentiment on @JohnsonDDG , Dislikes without explanation has always been a peeve of mine, but in such a hot topic of discussion on here which a lot of guys clearly feel very strongly about, that's downright low. To Dislike something like this you at least have to have the balls to give a petty reply.
I'll admit it, it completely falls in line with the black pill theory and it's an actual study.
My stance: looks matter and are a primary factor in attraction, but social skills and compatibility or also very important.
I also maintain that its better to be a 5 out of 10 looks guy who dresses well, keeps fit, has a career, hobbies, and social skills over an 8 out in 10 looks guy who lives like a loser and he is socially inept.