How can you even dispute that.Strong evidence.
How can you even dispute that.Strong evidence.
No one here owes you information. The irony of someone such as yourself calling people entitled is hilarious.You are not a researcher and you should be less entitled. You are just a keyboard warrior. Nobody in the scientific comunity has a clue about who you are.
You sound like a bitter fool who's spouting nonsense because no one here wants to indulge in your negativity. Congrats for being NW0, now go away.Also macaques... JFL. This drug is at least 10 years away of hitting the market. I ve been in this game for 10+years and I am still nw0. Good luck achieving my results with this meme drug.
Did you know that the retention/concentration of topicals into the hair follicle is under 5%? Of course not, because you legitimately have no idea what you are talking about.You didnt prove anything buddy.
Also if dht is produced in the follicle why oral finas and dutas are so succesful at maintaining hair? Even more, they are more succesful than topical versions... time to use logic buddys..
The chance of you being retarded is statistically significant, that's for sureYou didnt prove anything buddy.
Also if dht is produced in the follicle why oral finas and dutas are so succesful at maintaining hair? Even more, they are more succesful than topical versions... time to use logic buddys..
Then you clearly do not study statistics. Also, please read your reply one more time. The sentence is not correct english.That phrase doesnt have any sense. Low iq detected.
So? It should still work better than oral if follicles produce dht. Clown.
Tbh it wouldn't really matter. No one is going to tackle this angle better or faster than BAY so ultimately wont make a big difference to us.How widely in the hairloss community has news of the BAY prolactin studies traveled? Have the popular Youtubers covered it, your Hairlicioussly, your Hairguard and the like? Are the guys at Tressles aware of it?
I ask, because I think there's a benefit to trumpeting this far and wide, because the pharmaceutical industry should become aware of it ASAP so that they can start searching for ways to exploit this angle, instead of dicking around with the AR.
Hitting FDA approval yes, but it will reach chinese suppliers earlier always happensThen the guy who wrote it was clearly wrong. In science you have to be precise buddy.
Anyway, this is more than 10 years away from hitting the market. Good luck reading this meme "studies".
You are obvious not bald enough or don't care enough about your baldness.JFL at buying this to kane or a wuhan lab.
Why are you on this forum if you are NW0? Would be really cool if you could stop spamming this topic ;-)I am nw0 now, but i had diffuse thinning all over my head. Hair gains+dermapen+iodine+finas microdose solved my problem.
We just need a more potent cb, not this meme drugs.
I tried duta, cb, ru, way more potent sh*t. All didnt work. New angle would be niceI am nw0 now, but i had diffuse thinning all over my head. Hair gains+dermapen+iodine+finas microdose solved my problem.
We just need a more potent cb, not this meme drugs.
It's a little premature to say that before we've seen any human studies.Tbh it wouldn't really matter. No one is going to tackle this angle better or faster than BAY so ultimately wont make a big difference to us.
He's gonna stop when people stop responding to him.Why are you on this forum if you are NW0? Would be really cool if you could stop spamming this topic ;-)
It's not premature to say that because BAY is going to known down 100% of the receptor. If it doesn't work, the PRLR route is dead.It's a little premature to say that before we've seen any human studies.
He's gonna stop when people stop responding to him.