Kevin S. Wilson said:...dumb-***.
Is it alright if we respond to this dumbass?
Kevin S. Wilson said:...dumb-***.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:27:14 GMT, Nathan Lau launate@sbcglobaldot.net> wrote:
Subject: Re: PING: Kevin - OT Spam Judgement
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:27:14 GMT, Nathan Lau launate@sbcglobaldot.net > wrote:
Did you ever get any money outta that spammer? [/i]
"Kevin S. Wilson" <rescyou@spro.net > wrote in message
news:fs74nvs987b2ree6691ofti3remh0jkd7f@4ax.com...
Not yet. They appealed the judgment, but there is no appealing a default judgment in Idaho. (It was a default judgment because they didn't show up in court.) My first polite letter asking them to satisfy the judgment was ignored. Today I sent a second letter, informing them that I would turn the judgment over to a collection agency if it wasn't satisfied in 10 days.
And I just got spammed again today by a company in Oregon. I sent them a link to the USA Today story about my lawsuit and told them, "You're next."
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology