You didn’t take five minutes to show those results, since I was stalking what you’re viewing. You were looking at several, and many of them disproved what you were saying so you tactically picked out those links.
It doesn’t make sense to me because most of those results required minoxidil, and most of them had a significantly better baseline than I do. I am speaking for those who suffer with severe hair loss, similar to mine, at such a young age. Those specific people will not respond to dutasteride. There’s actually a study which shows that finasteride is less effective in younger patients, and that’s one the threads you came across but strategically didn’t mention it. And, you failed to mention this thread which you came across
https://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/threads/zzzzzs-1-year-dutasteride-results.81732/
I said that minoxidil alone is not effective, and I still don’t think it’s effective when I look at the statistics behind it being used alone - and if it can’t be used alone, what’s the point of using it? Other points I mentioned is that it’s costly and a hassle to apply, which still applies. I know that minoxidil works in synergy with an anti-androgen, especially when it’s oral minoxidil. I still do not like topical minoxidil, which is why I don’t care for the ‘proof’ you are providing.
And, those results you shown still prove that dutasteride isn’t great in the long-term. Especially if your baseline is horrible like mine at a young age, whilst being used as a treatment alone. DHT isn’t the only hormone to cause hair loss.
It doesn’t matter if medications are FDA approved to treat hair loss, since this discussion is still based around dutasteride. Unless you haven’t seen the thread title.