Early 30s Bald Guy Still Gets Loads of Women

Nene

Senior Member
Reaction score
12
s.a.f said:
New theory : Maybe he was a NW1 when he started blackmailing women into sex but all that ejaculating (increased DHT) turned him bald! :woot:

Hahahahahaha! SAF you got it! That upped his testosterone and made him go bald! :agree:
 

Boondock

Senior Member
Reaction score
13
s.a.f said:
New theory : Maybe he was a NW1 when he started blackmailing women into sex but all that ejaculating (increased DHT) turned him bald! :woot:

:bravo:
 

FSHGLD

Established Member
Reaction score
2
I agree that he'd look better with a rug but he'd still be bottom 20%, so what'd be the point? He'd still be aiming for bottom 20% women with a mug like that, who in the UK, are pretty f-ing mingin...He'd still have to deal with the stigma of wearing a rug, which is far greater than being bald.
 

Nene

Senior Member
Reaction score
12
I think the hair loss is really hurting him, dude is Norwood 8 in his early 30s.
 

Boondock

Senior Member
Reaction score
13
Nene said:
I think the hair loss is really hurting him, dude is Norwood 8 in his early 30s.

He was probably one of the mid-20s guys posting here in 2003 saying "no problem bro, HM will be out by 2006, then I'll still have time to get in the chicks before I'm 30."
 

qball01

Established Member
Reaction score
1
cuebald said:
I'd definitely say he's at least a 3 or a 4. The point being if he had a NW1 I bet a lot less women would be calling him a "creep" (losing some facial chub and the stereotypical "rapists smirk" would help too).


Did you read the article dudemon? the point was he didn't get a lot of women - even when abusing his powers and using blackmail he failed with 60% of his targets.

Hmmmmm...just a thought, but maybe a lot less women would call him a creep....IF HE HADN'T BLACKMAILED INNOCENT FEMALES INTO SLEEPING WITH HIM!!! That is why he is a creep!

"'She felt like she was being stalked - he would pull up outside her work and stay there in a patrol car for 20 minutes.'

She did not see him again but received unwanted text messages saying: "Will you have sex with me?"

LMAO at you thinking the fact he failed with 60 percent of his targets had to do with the fact he was bald....it had to do with the fact that he was a giant creep who was desperate enough to attempt to blackmail women into sleeping with him for committing MINOR traffic offenses. I think that most women would rather pay minor fines than sleep with a stranger who tries to bribe them into sex. The fact that even some women actually agreed to sleep with him is a joke to me. What he did was basically a step below rape...and women don't exactly find men who give off a "rape vibe" to be particularly attractive regardless of what they look like!

And yeah....unfortunately, the guy is not very attractive. You know how they say the keys to pulling off bald are...decent head shape, being in shape, having an already somewhat handsome face, a bit of a tan, and some facial hair?....Unfortunately, he has none of those things going for him! Of course he doesn't look good...its not like he would make women swoon if he had a thick, lustrous Norwood 1 either!

Sometimes you people astound me...him being bald is like the least important part of this story! And he was married with children so its not like he didn't have anybody. He was clearly just a deeply psychologically disturbed man with severe self esteem issues.
 

Boondock

Senior Member
Reaction score
13
Here is a picture of the offender as a NW1:

child-exam-2_slide_show.jpg


How many women was he asaulting then? ZERO

And now the offender as a NW7:

article-1286803-0A0C1E36000005DC-738_233x541.jpg


How many women was he raping now? A lot

COINCIDENCE???
 

qball01

Established Member
Reaction score
1
Boondock said:
Here is a picture of the offender as a NW1:

child-exam-2_slide_show.jpg


How many women was he asaulting then? ZERO

And now the offender as a NW7:

article-1286803-0A0C1E36000005DC-738_233x541.jpg


How many women was he raping now? A lot

COINCIDENCE???

upon further review...you're correct. Obviously he was getting all the chicks as an 11 year old Norwood 1...but once he lost the crucial frame to his face, the only way women would sleep with him is if he forced them to. Such a shame really because he was quite a looker with his hair. Dare I say he looked like Marlon Brando and James Franco fused into one awesome man.
 

Smooth

Experienced Member
Reaction score
2
Boondock said:
Here is a picture of the offender as a NW1:

child-exam-2_slide_show.jpg


How many women was he asaulting then? ZERO

And now the offender as a NW7:

article-1286803-0A0C1E36000005DC-738_233x541.jpg


How many women was he raping now? A lot

COINCIDENCE???

Elementary, my dear Watson... elementary... :geek:
 

DoctorHouse

Senior Member
Reaction score
5,725
Well thanks to this forum this guy is now becoming a bald celebrity. That is definitely going to help him get loads of women if he gets out of jail in a few years............................................... :whistle:
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
Boondock said:
Here is a picture of the offender as a NW1:

child-exam-2_slide_show.jpg

Even then he does'nt have a straight across looking hairline. I can tell just by looking at that forehead that he's going to go bald early.
 

Boondock

Senior Member
Reaction score
13
New quotes from the article reveal the bald truth of what people think of this guy:

Yuk !! they must have been over the limit as well to agree to that !

I'd rather have had a ticket/fine/ etc than sleep with that. Some women really have no standards. Was cheating on their husbands really worth it. I suspect not. Not to mention he is not at all good looking, in the slightest.

I wouldn't mind but he is no bed rocker is he. I'd rrather pay the fine. If he is 33 im playing up front for england on Friday night in my bra LOL!!!!!!

Well Im not surprised have you seen the state of him its the
only way he'd get some

What a revolting little creep! Having said why on earth did the two women agree to have sex with this man? Do they not have any self respect? Even if I was skint I would rather go without food for a few days to pay the fine then touch that guy with a bargepole!

Beauty is in the eye of the heholder, were these woman blind as well as stupid?

Surely the ugliest PC on the force?

I'd rather have had my car impounded!

Ewwww, I would have to have a death sentence hanging over me to sleep with this ugly creep and then I'd probably opt for the noose...

To be fair, looking at him, it's the only way he was gonna get any!

Would have rather faced the consequences than gone anywhere near him

33 ? Shome mishtake, shurely?

Looking how ugly he is, I guess that's the only way he was going to steal some sex.

Having seen him I would prefer to pay the fine.

How disgusting is he? And looking at him I think I would have paid my fine and paid him too just to disappear. Creep.

Creep exactly..even looks creepy..did they put a bag over his head during the romp ??

Good God I can hardly believe any of those women agreed to go within 50 foot of him, he is most unattractive.

What on earth did they see in him?

The women must have been desperate to agree to have sex with HIM !

33 he looks older than that, I think if I had been one of his victims I would have willing paid TREBLE the fine, what a creep !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Er yuk! What a little cretin! I wouldnt fancy him baked!

He looks much older thank his 33 years.
 

Nashville Hairline

Experienced Member
Reaction score
9
I'd guess most of the women responding to that article are no oil paintings themselves, all things considered.

Weird that the victims woud have sex with him rather than pay the fine..its only about £80 or something isn't it? It doesn't add up. Perhaps the illicit sex in motorway laybys with a bald, chinny policeman really did turn these women on? :dunno:
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
Nashville Hairline said:
Weird that the victims woud have sex with him rather than pay the fine..its only about £80 or something isn't it? It doesn't add up. Perhaps the illicit sex in motorway laybys with a bald, chinny policeman really did turn these women on? :dunno:

Some of the women would have lost their licences for offences like drink driving ect. Maybe it was the uniform thing that they liked though. :whistle:
 

qball01

Established Member
Reaction score
1
you guys can't be serious once again....Boondock, those comments are pretty damn mean I agree...but lets think about how people (especially women) operate based on emotions and associations. They have just finished reading an article about how he has committed vile, disgusting sexual offenses....OBVIOUSLY they're going to write horrible things about him and some will use his physical appearance as a scapegoat. But what if the article had been "Brave Police Officer Rescues Boy From Burning Building." ? I bet you'd see a lot of comments like "oh, hes so sweet" "such a nice smile" "What a great guy!" etc. I'm not saying they would be posting things like "OMG HES SOOO HOT!" but there definitely wouldn't be a bunch of derogatory comments.

And once again...stop making this about his damn lack of hair! There are a multitude of other physical reasons as to why he is not attractive. The example I think of is Wayne Rooney...sure, you hear a lot of comments along the lines of him being a "bald git" and poking fun at his hair...but the man was nicknamed Shrek long before any hairloss! So the hairloss just adds to the unnatractiveness, but it doesn't create it. By that token, you don't exactly hear a lot of comments directed to Freddie Ljunberg along the lines of "omg hes balding badly! Sooo ugly!"

Bottom line is...looks matter, yes. But hair (or lack of) itself does not amount to how you look. The guy from this story is just not an attractive man, plain and simple. Yeah he looks worse than he would with no hair and has a huge head that doesn't help matters...but ultimately its still a fraction of what makes him unattractive.
 

Nene

Senior Member
Reaction score
12
s.a.f said:
Boondock said:
Here is a picture of the offender as a NW1:

child-exam-2_slide_show.jpg

Even then he does'nt have a straight across looking hairline. I can tell just by looking at that forehead that he's going to go bald early.

Are you "taking the piss?"
 

Boondock

Senior Member
Reaction score
13
qball01 said:
you guys can't be serious once again....Boondock, those comments are pretty damn mean I agree...but lets think about how people (especially women) operate based on emotions and associations. They have just finished reading an article about how he has committed vile, disgusting sexual offenses....OBVIOUSLY they're going to write horrible things about him and some will use his physical appearance as a scapegoat. But what if the article had been "Brave Police Officer Rescues Boy From Burning Building." ? I bet you'd see a lot of comments like "oh, hes so sweet" "such a nice smile" "What a great guy!" etc. I'm not saying they would be posting things like "OMG HES SOOO HOT!" but there definitely wouldn't be a bunch of derogatory comments.

And once again...stop making this about his damn lack of hair! There are a multitude of other physical reasons as to why he is not attractive. The example I think of is Wayne Rooney...sure, you hear a lot of comments along the lines of him being a "bald git" and poking fun at his hair...but the man was nicknamed Shrek long before any hairloss! So the hairloss just adds to the unnatractiveness, but it doesn't create it. By that token, you don't exactly hear a lot of comments directed to Freddie Ljunberg along the lines of "omg hes balding badly! Sooo ugly!"

Bottom line is...looks matter, yes. But hair (or lack of) itself does not amount to how you look. The guy from this story is just not an attractive man, plain and simple. Yeah he looks worse than he would with no hair and has a huge head that doesn't help matters...but ultimately its still a fraction of what makes him unattractive.

It varies. In this guy's case, with a full head of hair he'd be 'average-looking'. With a bald pate he's a 'creep'.

Of course there are the 5% of guys like ljunberg who aren't affected by it at all. They 'suit' the bald look. This guy doesn't.
 

qball01

Established Member
Reaction score
1
Boondock said:
qball01 said:
you guys can't be serious once again....Boondock, those comments are pretty damn mean I agree...but lets think about how people (especially women) operate based on emotions and associations. They have just finished reading an article about how he has committed vile, disgusting sexual offenses....OBVIOUSLY they're going to write horrible things about him and some will use his physical appearance as a scapegoat. But what if the article had been "Brave Police Officer Rescues Boy From Burning Building." ? I bet you'd see a lot of comments like "oh, hes so sweet" "such a nice smile" "What a great guy!" etc. I'm not saying they would be posting things like "OMG HES SOOO HOT!" but there definitely wouldn't be a bunch of derogatory comments.

And once again...stop making this about his damn lack of hair! There are a multitude of other physical reasons as to why he is not attractive. The example I think of is Wayne Rooney...sure, you hear a lot of comments along the lines of him being a "bald git" and poking fun at his hair...but the man was nicknamed Shrek long before any hairloss! So the hairloss just adds to the unnatractiveness, but it doesn't create it. By that token, you don't exactly hear a lot of comments directed to Freddie Ljunberg along the lines of "omg hes balding badly! Sooo ugly!"

Bottom line is...looks matter, yes. But hair (or lack of) itself does not amount to how you look. The guy from this story is just not an attractive man, plain and simple. Yeah he looks worse than he would with no hair and has a huge head that doesn't help matters...but ultimately its still a fraction of what makes him unattractive.

It varies. In this guy's case, with a full head of hair he'd be 'average-looking'. With a bald pate he's a 'creep'.

Of course there are the 5% of guys like ljunberg who aren't affected by it at all. They 'suit' the bald look. This guy doesn't.

Lol, somebody photoshop this guy with hair...I wanna see what he would look like...

and all I'm saying is that people are missing the point as to why hes a "creep." Yeah, the bald head doesn't help matters but the fact he did what he did is why hes a creep. He would still get negative comments in that article even if he had hair simply because what he did is associated very strongly with "creepiness." The girls who made those comments would have labeled him a "creep" regardless...seeing the picture only reinforced that label. But ultimately, since this is a hairloss site, people are giving the bald factor much more merit than it deserves...its the whole package IMO that contributes...his boyish face, the glasses, the sheepish smile, THE FACT HE FORCED WOMEN TO SLEEP WITH HIM, etc. Those all play a larger role than him being bald.
 
Top