you guys can't be serious once again....Boondock, those comments are pretty damn mean I agree...but lets think about how people (especially women) operate based on emotions and associations. They have just finished reading an article about how he has committed vile, disgusting sexual offenses....OBVIOUSLY they're going to write horrible things about him and some will use his physical appearance as a scapegoat. But what if the article had been "Brave Police Officer Rescues Boy From Burning Building." ? I bet you'd see a lot of comments like "oh, hes so sweet" "such a nice smile" "What a great guy!" etc. I'm not saying they would be posting things like "OMG HES SOOO HOT!" but there definitely wouldn't be a bunch of derogatory comments.
And once again...stop making this about his damn lack of hair! There are a multitude of other physical reasons as to why he is not attractive. The example I think of is Wayne Rooney...sure, you hear a lot of comments along the lines of him being a "bald git" and poking fun at his hair...but the man was nicknamed Shrek long before any hairloss! So the hairloss just adds to the unnatractiveness, but it doesn't create it. By that token, you don't exactly hear a lot of comments directed to Freddie Ljunberg along the lines of "omg hes balding badly! Sooo ugly!"
Bottom line is...looks matter, yes. But hair (or lack of) itself does not amount to how you look. The guy from this story is just not an attractive man, plain and simple. Yeah he looks worse than he would with no hair and has a huge head that doesn't help matters...but ultimately its still a fraction of what makes him unattractive.