- Reaction score
- 2,032
In HRT for feminization and hair loss, do half-lives matter? I have seen no evidence that they do except in the sense of exceeding adult female targets of estrogen continuously for several months.
Treating androgen poisoning is something I will always support. I'm just saying gender dysphoria is not something that is "late onset", so either you have had dysphoria for longer than you realize (but repressed it), or you have something other than typical gender dysphoria. Whatever the reason though, morphological autonomy should be maintained.So my choice to do this is illusory? Maybe if I separate out preference of a partner's gender from that of my gender. I am not attracted to men's faces or the way they look but at least half or more are attracted to men so that to me is sort of a basic divide that makes me feel non-binary and I have no dead name; I use both. I always disliked being male more than I pined for female organs although I would prefer them. I have had a lot of therapy, hundreds of visits and I still haven't figured all of this out. I do like having guys be attracted to me.
I'm very pro gun rights/gun ownership. The fact of the matter though, is that male biology tends to increase violent tendencies, more so than socialization. It is hormonal. Liberals don't like to acknowledge that fact because it goes against their tabula rasa ideology.Part of my ethic is literally not wanting to possess something that can be used as a weapon in assault.
I see, I am Marxist-Leninist, so authoritarian left.I am al left-wing libertarian.
Yeah, trans women have prostate cancer risks way lower than untreated amabs and breast cancer risks somewhat lower than afab women. Overall a net benefit to health in terms of cancer risk I would say.Prostate cancer
Since castration—either surgical or medical—is the primary treatment in prostate cancer, it might be expected that the incidence of prostate cancer is low in transgender women. Indeed, reports of prostate cancer have been limited to a few case reports.82 In a review of more than 1000 transgender women followed up by the Amsterdam clinic, only one case of prostate cancer was discovered.83 On the basis of the low overall prevalence of prostate cancer, these authors suggest screening for prostate cancer only after age 50 years.
I grew up listening to Radio Habana Cuba wearing a beret and "Che" was my nickname after I read "Guerrilla Warfare.".I see, I am Marxist-Leninist, so authoritarian left.
My effects in terms of rejuvenation of everything have been astounding and thrilling. I tout HRT as life-saver and beauty technique not to mention the exquisite.Yeah, trans women have prostate cancer risks way lower than untreated amabs and breast cancer risks somewhat lower than afab women. Overall a net benefit to health in terms of cancer risk I would say.
This is true, however, I will add a caveat that female hormone levels alone is not necessarily enough to regrow temple hair. For that I think sub physiological levels of androgen transcription is needed due to how sensitive that area is to androgens. (You can also see this in the way lots of cis women have receded temples despite having "normal" range testosterone and estradiol levels, simply due to being prone to hair loss and having the receptor sensitivity there.)So yeah, I spend all day reading HRT articles but bang, check this out as to why AA's are often unnecessary and unsafe but again, you guys get freaked out by the letters E-S-T-R-O-G-E-N. None of that for me, gimme Bica, gimme spironolactone, gimme CPA.
The health risks attributed to estradiol doses high enough to suppress androgens have not been found in the parenteral or transdermal application of bioidentical estradiol. Thus it is unclear why those estradiol doses should be kept low in order to make the addition of androgen antagonists like CPA or spironolactone necessary.
Antiandrogens or estradiol treatments or both during hormone replacement therapy in transitioning transgender women
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:The objective of this proposed systematic review and meta‐analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of hormone replacement therapy with antiandrogens or ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I am far north of 400 pg/ml. I love the mind-set.This is true, however, I will add a caveat that female hormone levels alone is not necessarily enough to regrow temple hair. For that I think sub physiological levels of androgen transcription is needed due to how sensitive that area is to androgens. (You can also see this in the way lots of cis women have receded temples despite having "normal" range testosterone and estradiol levels, simply due to being prone to hair loss and having the receptor sensitivity there.)
That is good for reducing LH, so all of your androgens should come from the adrenals at that point. However, with unblocked receptors that is still enough androgens to do harm. The high E2 also helps with that a bit though as it spikes SHBG and binds the free T/DHT. But a receptor antagonist may still be indicated for full results.I am far north of 400 pg/ml. I love the mind-set.
With all due respect, Bica is not a guarantee to regrow hair, not even Estrogen is a guarantee, nothing is a guarantee.– I am aggressively balding and really want my hair
– Take Bicalutamide
– Will my libido decrease?
– Dude you said you want your hair
– Only "male" procedures!
I will never understand these people. The Russian balding community consists entirely of such people, on this forum the situation is better
First, people whine that they do not want to become bald, and then they scream that they cannot afford a decrease in libido. Cowardly fools will go bald and I don't feel sorry for them
If a person says that he is very worried about baldness, and then whines that he is worried about a decrease in libido or something else, hair loss does not bother him that muchWith all due respect, Bica is not a guarantee to regrow hair, not even Estrogen is a guarantee, nothing is a guarantee.
People need to weight the pros and cons of each treatment, and as for the case of Bica, it is not as much a "libido" issue as it is an 80% chance of gyno. So i can totally understand the "Err" on the Bica option. Messing with Androgen Receptors has always been a fear of mine, since we don't know many things about the matter to begin with..
You need to acknowledge that here we are speaking of prostate cancer drugs with liver failure as a side effect, Estradiol, birth controls, progesterone, medications that can cause brain tumours (a.k.a CPA) ect... it is not a "cowardly" act to have second thoughts.