That's my tidbit to throw in about Mormonism. I have thoroughly de-constructed Mormonism. It's just stupid more than anything else but I have thought of polygamy as a solution at times.You've always been a paragon of modesty.
That's my tidbit to throw in about Mormonism. I have thoroughly de-constructed Mormonism. It's just stupid more than anything else but I have thought of polygamy as a solution at times.You've always been a paragon of modesty.
Purrs either way but Lilllith and Ashterof were always far more interesting than the hackney Yahweh always with the lightning bolts and the white beard....Or the new Lilith?
Where there's a Will, there's NOT a Yahweh.Purrs either way but Lilllith and Ashterof were always far more interesting than the hackney Yahweh always with the lightning bolts and the white beard....
I agree that's a definition of objective, though it's also commonly used to construe a means of attempted impartiality instead of personal bias. But regardless my point was more consistent with your definition anyway in that it doesn't matter ones "subjective" view on something like murder because if they carry out that view in a society that has laws against it (i.e. it's an objective fact that murder is codified as a crime) they can't plead that it's a matter of "subjective taste"That's not somewhat objective that's 2 people coming to same subjective conclusion. Objectivity literally means it's a true or false, cut and dry measurable concept. Something can't be partially objective. There can be things that involve objective things and subjective things like medicine but the things in it that are objective are wholly so. Like whether someone's blood sugar passes a certain threshy
We have an extrordinary limited imagination for these things, by design. It's just not something the human brain evolved to conceptualize. Our version of intelligently organizing matter wouldn't exist. I wouldn't insist with any certainty, that other complex systems, we can't comprehend wouldn't be able to evolve, if some parameters were different. That's really impossible to predict for humans imo.I think the fine turning argument would say that if you kept the physical laws, and very slightly changed a few parameters, you wouldn't get anything orderly at all, let alone matter or life, and so forth. In order to even get species that claw their way through a mountain of sh*t to survive, you first need matter and complex structures and so on.
As far as I know that's the only other definition for it besides another word for goal. And if people misuse the term and try to pass themselves off as objective when they're not that doesn't change the words definition itselfI agree that's a definition of objective, though it's also commonly used to construe a means of attempted impartiality instead of personal bias. But regardless my point was more consistent with your definition anyway in that it doesn't matter ones "subjective" view on something like murder because if they carry out that view in a society that has laws against it (i.e. it's an objective fact that murder is codified as a crime) they can't plead that it's a matter of "subjective taste"
Good points but the fact that it still happened in the first place is amazing and is still an example of ridiculous exponential fine tuning. And you didn't address why humans are so special.View attachment 173733
Here's your 'perfectly fine-tuned' universe, bro. It's almost as if we had evolved through billions of years to survive in this environment. And not long ago, with the exact same biology we barely got by. Humans faced a genetic bottle neck several times, meaning we almost went extinct and survived via incest. A volcano on your ancestral island wiped out most of humanity not too long ago for example.
Btw most of the planet is also inhabitable and even mildly to medium toxic to us, because it's salt water, we get skin cancer from the sun, our own immune system often attacks and kills us for no f*****g reason and we have a sh*t ton of other genetic mutations, that end up in i.e. pic related. It's also not that unlikely, that we will destroy ourselves during the next 500 years.
Nothing here was fine tuned for us. Like any other successful species, we clawed our way through a sh*t ton of strive and misery, adapted and prevailed. For now.
If there is a creator, it's not a designer at all. He created the natural laws of the universe, fucked off and let it all play out, without interfering in the evolution of the human species at all. That's what the American founding fathers believed.
Mormons = literal white baby boomFairly sure that you've basically summarized old-school Mormonism.
I'm not sure they are as special as people think they are. Many animals rival our intelligence, not quite there but close. And we are just the only surviving species of a long line of intelligent hominids. Many directly or indirectly thriven to extiction by us. Biologically/behaviourally we do not really display anything, that's not present in other mammals, albeit sometimes less advanced. I.e. Crows have a mathematical ability, elephants mourn their dead, ants have agriculture and animal husbandry and chimps display forms of culture, depending on your definition.Good points but the fact that it still happened in the first place is amazing and is still an example of ridiculous exponential fine tuning. And you didn't address why humans are so special.
Strange. You're redpilled, it's usually SJWs who have that mindsetI'm not sure they are as special as people think they are. Many animals rival our intelligence, not quite there but close. And we are just the only surviving species of a long line of intelligent hominids. Many directly or indirectly thriven to extiction by us. Biologically/behaviourally we do not really display anything, that's not present in other mammals, albeit sometimes less advanced. I.e. Crows have a mathematical ability, elephants mourn their dead, ants have agriculture and animal husbandry and chimps display forms of culture, depending on your definition.
Civilizations are probably extremely rare to evolve, but I'd be surprised if we were the only one in the whole universe. And after all, special does not mean meaningful. Many animals have traits, that set them apart from most other liveforms. Our feats are very impressive to us, but if we Nagasaki our species in a few hundred years, this would all in all have been just a very short-lived and not all that successful evolutionary experiment.
I think what I want.Strange. You're redpilled, it's usually SJWs who have that mindset
There's arguments for both sides but I don't see how you can dismiss science, art, self awareness, etc. I'll reply more later
I was thinking of the redpillers that are wholesome and Christian like fredthebelgian or mainstream conservatives. Altho tbf some mainstream conservatives can be kinda bluepilled. Especially with race they tend to be those "Idc if you're purple" type anti racist boomersI think what I want.
But you are actually very wrong with that assessment, because you are too hung up in the most recent discourse:
Naturalism is redpilled and Humanism is for whine sipping upper class bluepillers, who think they are above it all if they read Goethe and listen to Bach and pay horrendous prices for the newest progressive theater play.
Yes, but gym, weed and dota make me forget about why I hate my life.anyone else done with life?
im trying to be stoic but f*** existence is poitnless f***.
So tell us what was the key to improve your dating life after all those years?
Christianity is an internationalist religion. Always was. And there's an awfully high percentage of incredibly pozzed Christians nowadays. The Pope said 'The Arab invasion of Europe is a good thing'. Last time I went to church, the priest sperged out about 'Drumpf' and sh*t.I was thinking of the redpillers that are wholesome and Christian like fredthebelgian or mainstream conservatives. Altho tbf some mainstream conservatives can be kinda bluepilled. Especially with race they tend to be those "Idc if you're purple" type anti racist boomers