(...) it's also interesting how most treatments are expected to yield about 10-15% regrowth.
Isn't it possible that percantage simply represents the extent of reversible damage? Even estrogen, which seems to give excellent regrowth, can't regrow temples entirely in higher Norwoods.
Maybe treatments cap off at that point not because they're not strong enough but because that's all they've still got to work with. If that's true, cumulative results would be out of the picture. No matter what you throw at it, the treatments would all be affecting the same 15% and everything else is just dead and wasted.
With the upcoming treatments it's always tempting to just assume they'll be compoudable but:
Admittedly, Follica is aiming for neogenesis so it could a different case - in theory.
But Cotsarelis himself seems to still be balding so there's that.
I love this answerHundreds of professional athletes are balding, or bald... should we assume they don't have the money to get a transplant?
Hundreds of professional athletes are balding, or bald... should we assume they don't have the money to get a transplant?
A lot of people are oblivious to their appearance and hair loss but it's far less likely to be the case with someone actually dealing with it as part of their profession.
Not to mention he would have easy access; wouldn't you expect him to do it out of sheer curiosity if nothing else? I mean, cost, stigma and convenience taken out of the equation, who'd ever really go "Nah, I'd rather be bald"?
Of course his bald patch is no basis for conclusions but it does make you think.