G
Guest
Guest
a permanent increase in what felk? testosterone? im confused are you saying that the tesosterone increase from dutasteride and finasteride is permanent?
Felk said:iamnaked said:The only way I can think of this being the case would be if the extra amount of testosterone maintained in the body from the superior action of the dutasteride started to have a damaging effect on the front hair receptors. This would also mean that front receptors have to be more receptive to testosterone than the back ones.
But I thought the increase in testosterone from using 5 AR blockers was a one-off not a permanent increase... So how could this dwindling level of testosterone outweight the effect of all that nasty DHT being present in the scalp. This turns the science on its head - suggesting that testosterone is actually MORE of an agonist than DHT at the front of the scalp. It doesn't add up.
It's actually a permanent increase, Bryan is always bursting his bubble trying to get everyone to accept this. There is no one of "spike" or anything, it's a "true upregulation" if I remember his last post about it correctly.
Another one who's front has gotten worse on dutasteride!
"i switched abruptly from finasteride to dutasteride. ive been on dutasteride for 5 months now, and front has gotten worse."
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/discussions ... highlight=
iamnaked said:THe Testosterone thing does surprise me slightly however. Perhaps the answer is to start taking some oral flutamide or spironolactone to get testosterone down to baseline levels.
iamnaked said:Felk said:iamnaked said:The only way I can think of this being the case would be if the extra amount of testosterone maintained in the body from the superior action of the dutasteride started to have a damaging effect on the front hair receptors. This would also mean that front receptors have to be more receptive to testosterone than the back ones.
But I thought the increase in testosterone from using 5 AR blockers was a one-off not a permanent increase... So how could this dwindling level of testosterone outweight the effect of all that nasty DHT being present in the scalp. This turns the science on its head - suggesting that testosterone is actually MORE of an agonist than DHT at the front of the scalp. It doesn't add up.
It's actually a permanent increase, Bryan is always bursting his bubble trying to get everyone to accept this. There is no one of "spike" or anything, it's a "true upregulation" if I remember his last post about it correctly.
Another one who's front has gotten worse on dutasteride!
"i switched abruptly from finasteride to dutasteride. ive been on dutasteride for 5 months now, and front has gotten worse."
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/discussions ... highlight=
For every finasteride -> dutasteride horror story I'm sure I've seen many more stories of people gushing with joy having gone the other way, so you'll excuse my suspicion. THe Testosterone thing does surprise me slightly however. Perhaps the answer is to start taking some oral flutamide or spironolactone to get testosterone down to baseline levels.
Well, spironolactone has at least two distinct actions, one of which tends to RAISE testosterone, while another tends to LOWER it. Which effect wins out over the other when you take spironolactone orally is difficult to say, and may depend to some extent on the dose. Maybe it's pretty much a push, since that study on oral spironolactone and hairloss that I posted recently claimed not to find any significant alteration of hormone levels.
Bryan
powersam said:spironolactone can raise testosterone? thats no good at all. could you explain that a little more?
powersam said:in reference to topical spironolactone?
powersam said:it says on the side of dr lees spironolactone 5% that it converts testosterone to oestrogen, is that crap?
powersam said:what should one use if they were afraid of elevated test levels in the scalp due to finasteride or dutasteride?
Bryan said:Well, spironolactone has at least two distinct actions, one of which tends to RAISE testosterone, while another tends to LOWER it. Which effect wins out over the other when you take spironolactone orally is difficult to say, and may depend to some extent on the dose. Maybe it's pretty much a push, since that study on oral spironolactone and hairloss that I posted recently claimed not to find any significant alteration of hormone levels.
Bryan
JayMan said:If it's a push then how is spironolactone beneficial if its main claim to fame is converting test to estrogen?
JayMan said:i assume you are referring to oral spironolactone that does this and not topical applied locally?