- Reaction score
- 4,891
I guess when you get kids you have other priorities beyond hair.Wonder why
I guess when you get kids you have other priorities beyond hair.Wonder why
I think the difference is that men make fun of their friends in their face for laughs. The mocking girls do behind their backs isn't for laughs, it's not even intended to be funny. Their only intention is to make themself feel superior.Except when mocking mates, lads tend to have almost no limits when making fun of their mates to their face. I've always felt I preferred it to the behind-the-back sh*t girls do.
First you have to find someone willing to reproduce with you in the first place.I guess when you get kids you have other priorities beyond hair.
Oh I see plenty of ugly fuckers with kids.First you have to find someone willing to reproduce with you in the first place.
Oh I see plenty of ugly fuckers with kids.
Getting someone pregnant is a piece of piss.
Finding someone who would make a good parent is obviously a lot harder.
We never denied that. They're running beta provider gametrue more ugly people than attractive people having kids, so they are having sex.
I keep having intrusive thoughts of the fact that people see me as low status. I think with aesthetics like mine you need another positive trait in at least the top 5% for people to even begin to respect you. Like your average nerdy stereotypical bald IT guy who is top 10% intelligence. Society still looks down on him.
And you have to be at least top 1% for people to see you as cool or impressive or someone worthy of admiration. Examples include Jason Statham and other super hot bald guys. They have extremely good looking faces and bodies to make up for being bald.
However, even then you will still have an obvious major disadvantage for people to look down on you with. A good example is the golfer Jordan Spieth that a thread was made about it before https://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/threads/hair-loss-jordan-spieth.91688/.
I'm struggling so much thinking about if looks really do determine your worth. Not only that but I feel guilty about thinking such a thing in the first place. I can't even get turned on seeing hot girls without a little bit of guilt nowadays x.x. Also obsessing over whether I have enough compensating traits to make up for being bald, short, and skinny. I'm constantly thinking about if i'm good enough and who is better than who because of this f*****g sh*t and it's driving me a bit crazy to be honest.
Deep down I feel worth is largely defined by your looks but I'm just too scared to admit it. Probably nearly everyone is like this as well.
My ego is ridiculously fragile nowadays. But the f*****g problem is IT'S FOR A GOOD f*****g REASON UNLIKE THESE f*****g FAKE DEPRESSED WHITE GIRLS RUNNING AROUND NOWADAYS. the whole depression chic thing is so f*****g annoying when you have a valid reason to be depressed
Nobody cares about normie faggots. Let the normies rot in their dumb culture. They will be destroyed by their own passions.Recently I've been thinking about the weights of looks and inner worth (soft skills, intelligence, confidence, ambition, humor, curiosity, manners, etc.) in the 'total value' of a human being, which can be inferred by their social status, income, fame. Both concur in defining an individual, but what's their weight?
An average or ugly looking man HAS to have exceptional inner worth to 'stand out' and gain social status among peers and women.
This means that your average looking guy will inevitably fall in the 'boring Joe' category unless something inside him, an inner worthy thing, makes him stand out greatly.
The most common thing that makes an otherwise boring Joe stand out and gain status is a practical talent. Talent in his job, academics, you name it, but true talent that makes him one of the best in his field. That way your average boring Joe is no more a boring Joe, but 'Joe the x' where x describes his talent.
Other inner 'stand out' things are exceptional soft skills, like negotiating skills, debating skills, speech skills, which cannot be taught so they make Joe unique. Many times we witness average, ugly and talentless Joes who, like magnets, bring attention on them and move minds with their words. An example is high ranking politicians, CEOs, military generals, but even comedians fall in this category.
In other words, a plain looking or ugly looking man has to be exceptional in something else to stand out. Exceptional is a very strong word. It's very difficult to be exceptional in anything.
Good looking men (i.e. 8/9 and above) are seemingly liked by default because of their looks. This means their simple appearance is already enough to stand out among peers; look at actors, models, pop culture celebrities, internet celebrities (forget about being instagram famous without good looks). Generally they bear no exceptional talent, nor skill, nor anything else; they may be somehow talented and passionate about something, but from their looks stems their status, their income and their fame. I witnessed with my own eyes balding, ugly-plain looking actors acting way better than their Hollywood counterparts. But they don't have looks nor exceptional talents, so they will never stand out and escape the 'boring joe' category which stops them like a glass ceiling.
My question is how much do looks actually concur in defining the value of a man? Sometimes they look like they are everything, sometimes they matter less. I just don't know but I will probably ponder forever about this.
We never denied that. They're running beta provider game
Modern women give nothing back except misery to men. I have never once met in real life a woman whom I consider to be kind except that girl who I asked out and she rejected me several months backYou mean the natural order of things in order for man to keep procreating since beginning of time?
yes beta provider game.
Recently I've been thinking about the weights of looks and inner worth (soft skills, intelligence, confidence, ambition, humor, curiosity, manners, etc.) in the 'total value' of a human being, which can be inferred by their social status, income, fame. Both concur in defining an individual, but what's their weight?
An average or ugly looking man HAS to have exceptional inner worth to 'stand out' and gain social status among peers and women.
This means that your average looking guy will inevitably fall in the 'boring Joe' category unless something inside him, an inner worthy thing, makes him stand out greatly.
The most common thing that makes an otherwise boring Joe stand out and gain status is a practical talent. Talent in his job, academics, you name it, but true talent that makes him one of the best in his field. That way your average boring Joe is no more a boring Joe, but 'Joe the x' where x describes his talent.
Other inner 'stand out' things are exceptional soft skills, like negotiating skills, debating skills, speech skills, which cannot be taught so they make Joe unique. Many times we witness average, ugly and talentless Joes who, like magnets, bring attention on them and move minds with their words. An example is high ranking politicians, CEOs, military generals, but even comedians fall in this category.
In other words, a plain looking or ugly looking man has to be exceptional in something else to stand out. Exceptional is a very strong word. It's very difficult to be exceptional in anything.
Good looking men (i.e. 8/9 and above) are seemingly liked by default because of their looks. This means their simple appearance is already enough to stand out among peers; look at actors, models, pop culture celebrities, internet celebrities (forget about being instagram famous without good looks). Generally they bear no exceptional talent, nor skill, nor anything else; they may be somehow talented and passionate about something, but from their looks stems their status, their income and their fame. I witnessed with my own eyes balding, ugly-plain looking actors acting way better than their Hollywood counterparts. But they don't have looks nor exceptional talents, so they will never stand out and escape the 'boring joe' category which stops them like a glass ceiling.
My question is how much do looks actually concur in defining the value of a man? Sometimes they look like they are everything, sometimes they matter less. I just don't know but I will probably ponder forever about this.
Modern women give nothing back except misery to men. I have never once met in real life a woman whom I consider to be kind except that girl who I asked out and she rejected me several months back
Does Fred have ginger pubes?This rule goes completely out of the window if we are drunk: if we are drunk we can be brutal. I once heard a group of men singing a song to a ginger man about having ginger pubes for 2 minutes straight.
I find mainstream culture mostly uninspiring. Apart from football.Nobody cares about normie faggots. Let the normies rot in their dumb culture. They will be destroyed by their own passions.
Enough with the bullshit.
I don't give two shits if you're good looking. I don't give two shits how much money you make. I don't give two shits how many likes you have on social media.
But the f*****g problem is IT'S FOR A GOOD f*****g REASON UNLIKE THESE f*****g FAKE DEPRESSED WHITE GIRLS RUNNING AROUND NOWADAYS. the whole depression chic thing is so f*****g annoying when you have a valid reason to be depressed
Speaking of oxymorons..."Depressed" girl is oxymoron
A bit off topic but: what do you make of the English summer?Depressed= no decent guy to f***, so let's be the center of attention with some ambiguous facebook post so I forget this need for a while.
A bit off topic but: what do you make of the English summer?
Do you find the grey sky's and lack of warmth depressing?
I lived there most of my life and I cant stand the grey sky's every f*****g day
Try Australia."Grey sky and lack of warmth"???? That's what you call 25 degrees and sunny days?
There's been gray days and rainy days, and luckily there will be many others. I came here to escape Italy's torrid weather and high humidity (35-37 degrees )