If you do not believe that confidence, wit and a personality are attractive features then you are the grandest fool of all.
If you do not believe that confidence, wit and a personality are attractive features then you are the grandest fool of all.
Who here has had success on tinder and pof?
I think you may be in denial at your lack of wit and online game.
I think you may be in denial to the importance of your good looks. I'm glad you mentioned Tinder as I'm a bit of an old hat on the app and can counter your nonsense with real authority. I have had a number of profiles over the last year or so, some using older photos of myself pre-NW6, others with my hairline as it is now, some with pictures of male models, some with female models and swiped pics of attractive girls and boys that I knew in real life. I wanted to see for myself the impact that looks had in online dating compared to personality, whether 'online game' has any impact or whether its all just predetermined from the photos. You want to know what I concluded? Its the f*****g photos man! The results were something like follows: NW2/3 me (flattering photos), roughly 15-20 matches in a couple of days, a match rate of something around 15%. NW6 me got 2, both landwhales, and I actually swiped slightly more girls right on the NW6 account than I did on the NW2.5. The models, as you can imagine, cleaned up. It was actually quite depressing. The dude was pushing 100 matches, the match rate was easily 80%+, while the model girl was even more succesful, I don't think even a single guy I swiped right rejected her. Most depressing though were the results of the real-life attractive acquaintances. Whilst nowhere near on the model level, the attractive guy secured an easy 50-60 matches (he was probably around an 8 in terms of rating). The attractive everyday girl (who is actually also a model so potentially unrepresentative) secured around 100, many of them highly attractive suitors in their own right.
These stats are crushing, but they're far from the most discouraging thing I witnessed in these experiments. That came when I begun to arrange fake dates. The "game" aspect, as you would call it. I deliberately modulated my "game" significantly between matches. For some, I would genuinely go out of my way to try and screw things up, pretending to be socially awkward, a virgin, thick as a plank of wood. Whilst I would be lying if I said that my severe lack of game made no difference, it was incredibly difficult to mess things up with the attractive profiles. The model girl, in particular, could do no f*****g wrong. Several times I outrighted insulted a number of matches, to which they would only grovel and lust after her all the more. With the exception of outright rejecting them, I could say anything and still get in their pants. With NW2/3 me though, it was a different story, poor game was crucified by and large, but interestingly, 'good game' didn't actually do a whole lot for me either. A lot of girls were still on the fence, no matter how slick my conversation. The experience with the attractive acquaintances was, as you'd expect, half way between the models' and mine. Bad game could certainly still blow things, but in terms of securing a date, it was much more a matter of not doing anything drastically wrong than actively doing things right.
Possibly the most damning bit of evidence from this whole thing though came when the NW2/3 me matched with the same girl as the male model profile. She was a 5/6 out of 10, nothing amazing, but cute nonetheless. I used almost the exact same chat up line to open the conversation with each profile, a variant of "I bet I can make you c*m with my hands tied behind my back". The NW2.5 was unmatched within seconds, the male model got "go onnnn ".
I imagine you're going to pour scorn on this, accuse me of BS or something similar. I understand your skepticism. I saw a similar experiement to mine on a bodybuilding website and I reacted exactly the same. So I tested it out for myself and lo and behold, they were right. I'd encourage you and others to do the same. Create a few fake profiles yourself and prepare to be red-pilled to the eyeballs.
Lol solid reality check.
I can also the Confirm the whole women's inhibitions and what you say going out the door once she wants your dick in her slit. When a girl thought of me as as attractive and nothing special it was a lot of exchange of messages but wasn't for sure closure on actually meeting up for a date, despite having her number.
When they were heavily attracted, it was an over night difference in excitment and making time for you. A lot of the time it would involve same day meet ups with great texting, and replies. No one word yawning answers, and if I didn't reply back they would follow up. 'Babyy!?'
Lol just lol at game mattering.
I have said it hundreds of times. How receptive a women is to you is determined by your tier of aesthetics.
Good field report
Bouquet of flowers on the first won't work?
once she wants your dick in her slit
That's how you win women in general.
beautiful, quite Shakespearean
that's how you win life*
Problem with these apps is male models are not realistic examples. Handsome men are very rare, and not good examples of what men can expect.
I seriously am starting to think that that male offspring is severely complex for producing a attractive male. Most women I see on the daily I would have sex with and a lot are pretry. I am pretty good at judging a man's aesthetics and I rarely see in a pool of 100 a few -10 that stand out. Perhaps it's my tesosterone that makes me a bull for spreading his seed in all women, but women are far different on selection within the online scene. Thy ate bombarded with average Joe's messaging them to hang out. Why would they meet up, when eventually a handsome man will swipe for them?
It's much easier to find a pretty chick in the street willing to give you a chance as a.mediocre man.
I read some studies awhile back showing how out of pools of women men picked yes for 78% but women on other hand said yes to I believe somewhere between 25-32%
With this profile picture, FredTheBelgian looks like such a cuddly vulnerable person, a gentle giant. Yet he attracts a lot of this
http://data.boomerang.nl/t/toettoet/image/im-gonna-get-medieval-on-your-***/s600/im-gonna-get-medieval-on-your-***.png
Shookwun, on who wants to date average chicks....
I do. Well, that's not entirely true. I'd love to date wealthy 10s. But then again, maybe I wouldn't. Maybe they would make me feel insecure.
I've dated many women who are average in the looks department but they were so fun to be around.
I met an amazing American teacher in Croatia years ago. She wasn't stunning, just okay looking, but as we spent the day together we were getting along so well, talking about music, history, books, and just having fun. As the day passed we became drunk, ate food, and later slept together in a quiet little hotel. Afterwards we ran out in the night and went skinny dipping in a lake. After that we spent three days together making out and having fun.
What was my memories of being with this average looking woman? Well, they were some of my finest memories. Those days with the American girl were some of the greatest days of my life (thus far).
And that, my friend, is my defence of average looking women.
No way, it's totally his "confidence" and awesome personality that just exudes from his very picture!
Matches dont mean anything.I actually get a decent number of matches on Tinder , about 1 a day, many quite attractive, but I almost never message them. If they message me then I'll always message back but usually if I message them first it's a chore, like getting blood from a stone trying to chat. POF was awful though, I think women only use it to massage their egos.