Don't worry, it's not.which is stupid. what if it is the cure? i for one would drain half of my blood for a NW1
Don't worry, it's not.which is stupid. what if it is the cure? i for one would drain half of my blood for a NW1
I've read these studies before and I understand what is trying to be done here. The problem is that there is no evidence that what we are seeing is neogenesis and it is more likely to be existing miniaturized hair that is growing back due to growth factors from dermarolling causing DP cell proliferation.
Choose your God.
http://www.hairestorationetwork.com/eve/image.php?u=182998&dateline=1363475737
![]()
Swiss temples in 2016 = COPE
No, Cotsarelis confirmed this is new hair. This is a mouse study, I'll give you that, but he cites dermatologists that documented the phenomenon in other animals and humans. So there IS evidence (and pretty strong), which is why Follica is under clinical trials right now. Maybe what you're really looking for is proof that this can be replicated in the human scalp. There is no proof yet (unless you count internet anecdotes); if you want proof you'll have to wait for Follica phase 3 trial results to be public.
Follica is n't derma rolling, they're dermabrasing 2mm of skin off. We also don't know the compound they are using, but we do know they mention minoxidil in the patents. This dermarolling/Seti/PGE2 has nothing to do with them and is a hyposethsis based on studies, you can't say Follica will be proof this works, they're two different things.
The results shown don't look like neogenesis at all, what it looks like is thickened miniturised hair you'd get with a growth stimulator like minoxidil and it's very unlikely that you will get much further than this, in fact looks like how far ST got before he stopped updating.
Choose your God.
http://www.hairestorationetwork.com/eve/image.php?u=182998&dateline=1363475737
![]()
Swiss temples in 2016 = COPE
am I blind?? I see absolutely NO results. at all. ???
there is no scars from such small wounds lolIf hair has more difficulty growing through scar tissue, then wounding might not be a viable long term solution. I commend the OP for taking the time to show such consistent reports though. I don't see results either, however there could be an element contributing to pilosebacious integrity which just doesn't manifest as hair growth, and I can't just write it off as totally ineffective.
I see what appears to be a change in skin color. Even a tiny wound of a great enough depth can cause scar tissue.
It's not as simple as "small wounds." Factors include the depth and area of the wound. Here's a study showing that there is a threshold depth at which dermal scarring occurs.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17440346/
I've read these studies before and I understand what is trying to be done here. The problem is that there is no evidence that what we are seeing is neogenesis and it is more likely to be existing miniaturized hair that is growing back due to growth factors from dermarolling causing DP cell proliferation.