- Reaction score
- 126
Then how do you explain slick bald men who went on trans regimen and got a full head of hair? This flies in the face of your theory. There are a lot of unknowns about hair loss and if I were you, I would refrain from making absolute and unsubstantiated claims.
I'm quoting claims. No one trully knows what exactly is the essence of hairloss but one thing is for sure, it's not just one variable. "then how you explain blablabla" is just as plausable for me to say how do you explain in your trans case, that it's not 100% effective (ie, you have bald trans men). So it didnt fly in "in the face of my theory", such theory isnt even mine, but the concepts are sound EVEN if you and your liking comment palls dont understand a thing of what is said on those articles. (not people's fault really)
In other words, you said this: "I didnt understand the theory + trans people get hair (not all of them) = your claims are unsubstantiated"
I guess you didnt read the whole articles. Those articles explain why slick bald people on anti androgenetic regiments don't get regrowth. Important point to give out is that, just like DHT levels and sensitivity depend on the individual, so does Fibrosis and scalp calcification.
In the end, we already know that androgens play the bigger part on hairloss but what Fibrosis and scalp calcification do is to make it permanent and that's what Trans people can get rid off with estrogen, making incredible recoveries. This is why the old saying about hairloss being easier to maintain hair than to regrow is because it's easier to prevent scalp fibrosis and calcification than to reverse it
You guys should read it before criticising like "i'm a know all"
https://perfecthairhealth.com/trans-hormone-replacement-therapy-hair-regrowth/
Last edited: